Jump to content

Avimimus

Members
  • Posts

    1455
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Avimimus

  1. But... the teaser... is still just the teaser? We are going to have to wait months aren't we? To find out if a Su-17/22 is planned?
  2. With the hints coming out - I'd change my answer to the Su-17 and the IA-58... aircraft I'm actually excited for. *edit* The IA-58 is probably from the free mod? Does the Razbam version even have a cockpit under development yet?
  3. Well, so long as you aren't operating a weapon or heavy weapons right? No harm no foul?
  4. Voice tone doesn't come across in text.... so people can't tell what is or isn't a joke. Also, since you raised young people trying to be non-offesnive, what happened to 'young people don't have any manners?' or is it only people in their nineties who still value politeness and respect? Young people can't win.
  5. To be fair - I spent a lot of time triple checking... I didn't want to risk being disappointed. There are a lot of differences though - starting with, well, everything (for the most part). I could see that. I think the Su-17/22 has about 75% of the payload, and an ability to make multiple passes on a target. It also might have a similar or greater variety of guided weapons (depending on the variant we get). So, it is a better fit than the Mig-27... even if it is more of a supersonic flash past kind of design that has some elements which are similar to the Mig-27. It'd definitely be nice to have all three someday
  6. The Jaguar kind-of always reminded me of the Panavia Tornado... if it got confused and thought it was a trainer. For some reason I've always loved it a bit.
  7. It'd be nice to see them team up. I'll take any Su-17/Su-22 I can get though!
  8. Hoping that the infrared system for ground units will also involve upgrades to seeker modelling... hoping for improved rocket fragmentation modelling for us helicopter types.
  9. Fascinating!
  10. I just want to see an official A-4 and F-100 and F-104 and F-105 get announced because... along with the A-6, A-7, F-4, F-8, in development and the other already released planes it'll mean that they'll start running out of American aircraft and have to give us a Mig-27 or Su-17 by 2030.
  11. I'd love a Mig-27. or better yet, a Su-17... old enough we might get them. But there was no Soviet/Russian aircraft in the trailer other than the updated 3d model for the Kamov and some shots of the Mi-24P.
  12. Just so you know - it is a Lancaster X - so a bit different: https://ingeniumcanada.org/aviation/artifact/avro-683-lancaster-x If there is a specific part of the landing-gear or bomb bay I might be able to get access to do a walk-around if I phone ahead.
  13. If you need reference photos from Ottawa (and environs) - let me know.
  14. Does the plan to remove the hardpoints mean we'll be able to civilianise the Gazelle? The version with the best forward view (and no anti-tank avionics) is the one with the minigun - so if we can remove the minigun it'll create an excellent multi-purpose helicopter.
  15. Yeah, it pioneered the twin-roof turbine layout of the Mi-8 and Mi-24... and was also used for a lot of weapon fits over the years.. and is ubiquitous as a transport and utility helicopter with almost 5,500 built! Plus the anti-tank missiles are more primitive so it gives a bit of that Mi-24D experience (MCLOS)... while also having a 23mm cannon, rockets, and Iglas...
  16. Yes, I gather that - rockets receive velocity from the launch aircraft (so they spin up faster) and they also aren't flying through rotor wash. I remember reading somewhere that the same rocket fired from a helicopter can have something like three times the dispersion it would have if fired from a jet. That said, the S-24 has an advantage in that its high mass would make it less effected by rotor wash, and its angled rocket engines would help it spin up a bit faster... so the effect should be less - but it should still be there.
  17. Clouds do move in their internal test version. *edit* I didn't realise this post was so old.
  18. You are missing the next most produced Soviet Helicopter - Mil Mi-2! Like an Mi-8 and a Gazelle or OH-58 had a baby... cannon, machine guns, rockets, anti-tank missiles, anti-aircraft missiles - quite a variety in the Polish URP version...
  19. I suspect the acquisition to release path for the Igla will be faster - and it also won't set off the laser warning receivers on the target - so there is probably still an advantage in a close fight with an Apache (which could easily happen in complex terrain).
  20. You'll have no sympathy once you realise how much of a range advantage the AGM114 has on the Igla!
  21. The overall upgrade to modern standards is necessary (e.g. Shkval fixes). The MWS will be quite useful. The Igla will be fun (and was offered as an export option). I'm hoping there will be options to carry less Vikhr per hardpoint... which appears to be a realistic option for range/performance when one only needs to take out a few targets.
  22. Also Mirage 50 I think in the last image? Note also that some effects in Glowing Amraam videos may be added in post (check disclaimer at beginning or end).
  23. I made a mod to fire them from the Mi-8 - and I got pretty good at it - practice helps... firing rockets from helicopters though ...is complex.
  24. So it might be possible on the Mi-28 with 9M120M variants? Interesting. As for the Vikhr - I believe that is just firing two missiles at the same target (both laser-beam riding) in order to increase the PK (probability of kill).... one benefit of having simple missiles that are much cheaper than the AGM114/Brimstone family!
  25. I hope the work on the Apache will benefit other modules (Ka-50, Mi-8/Mi-24, Su-25). It'd also be great to have the CRV-7 added for Canadian CF-18s (with their small number of unusually high energy AP flechettes)!
×
×
  • Create New...