VR Flight Guy in PJ Pants

Let me start with 1. Ministry of Interior 2. Shaikh Zayed Hospital

Yeah i have been off-topic too hard.

I would like to add MB-339A might be another exception. Yes, not much incentive to put out a plane very few heard about it. But Jaguar, dang it!

Shame but understandable. I don't like ASW either but somehow, the DLSS 4 gives me so of the same vib, but way, way, better off. Thank you for starting this this discussion.

Without quoting Thanos, I think since: 1. There is still no FFB sub-forum for each base out there, especially this very base; and 2. Worse, people, possibly with agenda, populate openly or secretly in other discussions. So this is a thread is for everyone who is curious or want to reflect on the nice and not-so-nice things (you may be amazed by what happened to me and what is happening over its Support Discord). This is just an epilogue, not the first post. Please feel free and help yourself.

I am told that some features on JA-37 are still being set as classified so HB refuses to make it, or may be it is not that popular as other bigger, more famous aircraft. One of the many threads around:

May I suggest ditching Oculus Link and use VD instead? And I am kinda "famous" that OTT refuses to work with me on 2 separate computers, so I do not use it at all.

I agree mostly why it should stay free. Well, unless it is like the exception case of A-4C-E, we will never get a true radio.

Well, since the AB9 is now a MFSSB base, once I have loaded the Viper preset, it stays and I am happy. I don't have to use the Moza software until I want to. Is the Rhino base software better? In some way, yes, but it still has bugs, even in calibration. It is understandable it is still in beta. Link, please?

Your list is amazing, but I would like to bring your attention to this one -- Make OH-6A Official! aka MOO!

Some of us have asked for this gem for -- I have lost count.

Was it for JA-37 or AJS-37? Educated guess would be the former which some of us crave for.

Some jets has no raindrop on canopy implemented yet, one example is F-4E. I think most helicopters do, I am not sure about CH-47 cause I don't have it, but now Ka-50III does show raindrops.

If you fly a lot of aircraft which as the stick on the right, which also employ some sort of MFSSB, then the default Rhino profile needs some work to have it work like but the AB9 profile more or less work fine in such use. I am not try to compare the two cause I have both and I love them both. The only downside of the MFSSB mode, it is not the overheating, it is hurting my wrist and my shoulder after prolong flight, which is a normal mission time. FFB may not be the base if you fly a lot of FBW planes, except the above. Older planes like F-14 and propellers will benefit most in terms of immersion. Also, many including myself, would swear by a FFB base, either one works great.

F-117A...

Nope. the preset in the latest version is here:

I used the UH-1H

Still no reaction from the moderation...

Change the topic title to reflect up-to-date discussions

Some how, I think I have lost eye tracking. I tried recal, but it always says the result is not satisfactory.

Nothing. Make sure just install the drivers and leave the NVIDIA app alone.

As long as they can have the weapons firing, I am fine…

Old vid:

I tried the suggestion in the recent couple of pages, it works. 1. Get the latest NVIDIA gaming driver, it is also recommended for VD users; 2. Get the NVPI (I think I get the developer right): https://github.com/Orbmu2k/nvidiaProfileInspector 3. Start the NVPI and perform the settings as seen in this post BTW, you may wish to also make changes to the ultra low latency and power management settings en route. 4. Of course, don't forget to select DLSS in the upscaling in DCS. That's, yes, that's. I don't have to make a video about it.

Great thanks! Update: it works wonder, so far no crashes, with QVFR, very little smearing and ghosting. Confirmed I am running the latest with Preset K on now.