MasterZelgadis

Ab-so-****ing-lutely :) Also AWACY, Tanker or Electronic Warfare

Just two words on comparing it to images or videos. White balance. Don't trust color in Images or videos.

Moin. Ich nutze ganz gern google maps für Karten und bearbeite die dann in Photoshop ein bisschen, dass sie wie Satellitenfotos aussehen (wenn man genau drüber nachdenkt sind es ja welche..)

Sometimes I do that, too. But even without that EXP mode, you have a little triangle on the circle showing to north.

But it should work with 98 AGL. Never had issues with that.

Also bitte, das hatten glaube ich alle als so selbstverständlich vorausgesetzt, dass man es nicht extra erwähnen muss.. :D

Set it on 0 ft AGL

Maybe you have to wait for the target to be acquired? The small counter bottom left corner. He fires always before the target was acquired

Let me check your forum statistics to see all the bug reports you made. Hmm.. No, except from participating in a controls shitstorm someone else started, I didn't find any. Did you sign a contract? An NDA? Something like that? That's what normally happens, when you are beta testing. You may do a lot of things, but ED's job certainly not. And again. it was YOUR CHOICE to "do their job", that moment you said "Early Access? Hm, I will pay that $80". I stay with it. No right to complain.

Aber das Risiko, dass er dann irgendwo hin-snapped, wo der IFFCC dann doch eine Lösung berechnen kann...

Why do you think you pay the $80 to get it before release? You pay the $80 for the module. Period. ED is kind enough to let you play the current development build because you paid these $80 before release. Let's say you would have to pay only $40, because only half the features are there. Do you want to pay the rest of the money at release? And if you don't you get a nice "you have to buy this feature" warning, when you try to fire a missile? I respect your opinion, but you know that it is feature incomplete (because it is labelled "early access".. which is absolutely no indicator for a state the software is in, by the way), and you, you alone can decide whether you want to pay the $80 for the current state or wait and pay the $80 when the software is "complete" (or rather on release, software is never complete). And anyone, who willingly has decided to pay these $80 for an incomplete software in development, has in my opinion absolutely not the right to complain about bugs or missing features in that piece of software.

Ich so gut wie nie. Wenn doch, reicht die Stick-Achse. Im Flug brauche ich sie dann sogut wie gar nicht mehr

Well, it says "Early Access", so if the price was $8, $80 or $800, you knew it was early access. Why should $80 not be an early access price? You will get the full module without paying anything extra. You just get the chance to try it out before release.

Wenn man Pedale hat..

Experience told, that such things are necessary ;)

Just let them fly over the target, and when they reach the target zone, set off some explosions via trigger. much more reliable than an ai attacking something (and much harder for ED to f**ck up with an update)..

Und nen Aileron trim :D

Zahlendreher ist sicher nicht unmöglich, aber dafür gibt es einen Readback und die Beschreibung des Ziels, ob du wirklich das gleiche (selbe!!) siehst wie der JTAC. Jetzt stell dir vor du speicherst die Position, willst aber auch zwecks SA wissen, wo die befreundeten Einheiten sind, machst dir noch einen Markpoint. So, jetzt ne JDAM runter, Markpoint hast ja gesetzt, im HUD ist auch ein Markpoint ausgewählt.. Markpoint C, müsste der richtige gewesen sein, Bombe raus, JTAC antwortet nicht mehr. Ups.. Klar, sollte auch bei Markpoints nicht passieren, das Risiko ist aber größer. Zumal JDAMs, da nur für unbewegliche Ziele geeignet, am besten sowieso auf vorher gebriefte Waypoints abgeworfen werden

I don't think they would have a better performance, if all the models are in a group rather than single ones. Especially with static objects, you can just click on them, press ctrl-c, click somewhere else, press ctrl-v. No need to group them.

Ich denke, dass eine Position niemals eine Angabe relativ zu einem WP in einem Flugplan angegeben wird. Der JTAC kennt den Flugplan nicht, und genau für solche Angaben sind IPs, ein Point Echo oder im schlimmsten Fall das Bullseye da. Allein schon, wenn man als JTAC mehrere Flights koordiniert, kennen die untereinander nicht die Flugpläne des anderen Flugs. Oder bei einem ungeplanten CAS, da hat man vermutlich nichtmal einen WP im Gebiet. Eine JDAM würde ich zum Beispiel niemals auf etwas anderes als auf einen Waypoint werfen. Das Risiko ist viel zu groß, dass ich mit dem TGP mal kurz die Position der befreundeten EInheiten aufgeklärt habe, und der SPI mitgewandert ist, oder ich mir diese Position markiert habe, dann aber vergessen habe zu wechseln. Ein Waypoint mit der Bezeichnung "TGT" ist da schon deutlich risikoärmer.

Happens to me all the time. When I think I see the button I want to press, I press the one below. Mostly this is correct then

I already identified a problem I have to deal with, it's when the helicopter gets too badly damaged when on the ground, but not killed. Had one situation yesterday where the pilots were dead, but the unit not destroyed. Enemies however stopped firing at him, so the mission was failed, but the "mission failed" trigger did not run. While I think about that problem, consider the mission failed, if at any time while the heli is on the ground and its rotor stops spinning.

I thought briefing would clear that up. Your task is to clear the compound of any threats to an incoming helicopter. Helicopter needs one hour from mission start. It will land, insert a DEVGRU team, which has a 15 minute long mission. In that time you are to provide cover for them. I will implement some radio options where you can recall your current mission objective.

Don't know whether the Infantry has radio and Laser, the HMMMV definitely has.

Doesn't help. Maybe you are pressing the wrong OSB..