Mizzy
-
Posts
1747 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
14
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Mizzy
-
And what are Razbam's intentions?
-
Ahh didn't know that, I have been accused of being untouchable, surely I had to prove I wasn't !
-
"Sorry, I had to remove that post by Viper, at some point, I have to draw the line at completely outlandish theories. People come here for official news, some things just skew the truth much MUCH too hard. Please save the wild theories no matter what side you feel you are on." There, is that elaborate enough for you.
-
no I'm not
-
Actually 20% is the usual for commission, or it was the last time I checked.
-
Indeed, it is obvious who needs a "chill pill" Mizzy
-
Please if you don't mind, it has been moderated my involvement in DCS, so please leave that subject alone now. I will reverse your statement, You obviously aren't capable of having a civil discussion with people that have opposing views from you ! Do you understand no matter who tells you anything opposing your mindset, the chances of you listening to those opposing opinions is zero. Your ego is crazy. Mizzy
-
Come on, you must have known I am going to respond to this. I admit nothing, in fact I would be a brilliant moderator telling some people where to stick their heads when they are talking out of their.. Well, maybe it's not a good idea for me being a moderator, I will leave it at that. Greetings Mizzy
-
Enjoy your evening or afternoon.
-
Brilliant, I wish I had your logic skills, Greetings Mizzy I don't contribute to ED other than in the same way as you do. I'm sorry what is your point, I don't mean to be rude.
-
I have been in legal wranglings several times in my life and all were long drawn out affairs which I don't ever want repeating. Good post that was. Mizzy
-
Oh dear, another conspirator from the year 2023, I wonder who this one is from Discord/Reddit
-
Hi Citizen, firstly I am not an influencer here in DCS, I don't use DCS to do any fighting so much of the threads on this forum are topics discussing things I have no idea about. If ED had 1.4 million reasons to make up a story about IP disputes, then I would say they had far too much time on their hands doing so "a platform to sensemake, speculate and spin while denying the same to folks that don't buy the company line." You have just answered your query, some of us don't buy the Company line of Razbam because Zambrfano's 'spin' does not make any sense and therefore it is without context of what the real dispute is actually all about. Ip infringement sounds far more logical that non payment issues causing all this mess. Indeed, I honesty believe there is zero chance of this being equitable simply because zambrano has dragged a confidential and private matter into the public domain with the result of his developers (no one knows what zambrano actually did) running amuck poisoning DCS over one issue and that's the one zambrano wants to push the narrative of non payment. For me, the quicker ED gets the nod from their lawyers that they can drop zambrano (and his band of two merry men), the better. Anyway, enjoy DCS, it's really good. Mizzy
-
Yes, something does not add up does it! Mizzy
-
Can't you see why we sussed you out as a Razboy straight away. You all use the 'non payment' tag when the dispute is clearly about something else that happened, and nobody knows what it was, other than IP infringement and led to Razbam not getting paid, the latter is not in dispute. Nobody here disputes Razbam not being paid and people clearly saw this well before you did it seems, so what is your real agenda being here because it's not about Razbam being paid or not! Really !! And that says it all about you being here, nobody knows who is at fault so where have you got your clarity from to make such a judgement? You forgot who made all this dispute public when these disputes are highly confidential, or should be. Who is 'leaking' uncorroborated evidence and using their Discord/Reddit to poison the other side? Yes you know who. You saw a statement from Razbam stating they haven't been paid and they have no idea why, come on, lapped it up hook line and sinker and swallowed it, pull the other one ! Is it really plausible a 3rd Party developer in DCS is not getting paid for no reason on their own Discord and then spread this sh%t to Reddit. Not only does it not make sense, we have one of the two stooges trying to claim ED has run out of money and that's the hinted reason for Razbam not getting paid. Zambrano, Smiley and Mishy2mashy obviously have something to be accountable for by the way they are acting and using fools to smear the other side. Try to think rationally, why was Razbam not paid, but please don't use the old sausage about HB, other 3rd Party business is highly confidential and another reason to hold Zambrano to account trying to bring in other developers into the dispute and further poison ED to save what may be just a failing business and his own reputation. Mizzy
-
Joined in June and made two posts on the same thread, what do you fear? Mizzy
-
Indeed I am from GB and an old one, hence the old saying. Yes, I didn't really phrase that well, what I meant was new to DCS and this forum. Mizzy
-
It's newcomers (or at least to this forum) to DCS that have your opinion. You joined in 2023, I joined in 2005. Your views are based on recent events and not DCS as a whole. DCS has been around for over 20 years and even longer if you look back at the history of the product. Yes, many of us do support the platform and for good reason, it's been developed from a philanthropist origin that no other 'commercial' product is comparable, other than BMS. Please don't exaggerate nonsense, ED are very supportive of everything in DCS so it is not fair to say they don't. You are, of course entitled to you opinion. Mizzy
-
Unfortunately yes, agreed. time for my bobos.
-
If you read this thread and the other one, you will get to know what my sources were but I think you have been informed where this information is. I don't want another warning (my last btw) and the moderators do not give a toss if I am male, female, pink or blue, I don't get any concessions like allowed to talk off topic and you are not. that is rubbish. As far as I am "not allowing anything" from Reddit/Discord or whatever, I have no control of what people use as a source when they dispute my opinions and information. However, the reason I don't accept Reddit and Discord sources is simply because they are hostile environments towards DCS and therefore not a good source to use in this thread. I apologise if I am coming over a bit flustered, but you keep jumping on my posts as if I shouldn't be here. Mizzy That is what I meant to say to some1 in his post.
-
I have no idea about the Harrier being improved out of early access, if it was, it isn't now sadly. Mizzy
-
Twofold, firstly, of course feature complete and early access are different things, you are stating the obvious, whether or not you agree a module is taken out of early access is up to you. But as far as the developer is concerned, it's finished and no further feature updates will be forthcoming only fixes, agree with it or not, that's the situation. Secondly, you have miss-interpreted what I said (not your fault) ED supporting fixes for broken modules, ED have stated that if the platform (DCS) by way of updates, breaks a module, they will endeavour to fix it. Nothing to do with source codes needed from the developer, it's fixing the module within the functionality of DCS. If you disagree with a developers feature complete decision, then you need to go to the developer and complain. The F15 is not included in what I said, this module is in dispute as we all know, I hope this helps you to understand the situation with modules in DCS. Mizzy
-
some1, you have been around here as long as I have and seen many changes to DCS, it's not the same game as it was in 2005, it's far more rich. I don't think you would want DCS to stagnate and you can't make scrambled eggs without breaking a few eggs. However, I agree with you that older modules are showing their age, the M2000 is a module I have but I never use it, but I can appreciate certain new features of DCS leave certain modules with problems, if you mainly play that module, then it's a big issue. I am going to suggest to DCS that each module has a disclaimer, like the one for the Hawk, so people know what version of DCS a particular module works as advertised, even though some people may dispute that. As far as the Mig19, Harrier and M2000 are concerned, Razbam considered these modules as feature complete and taken out of early access and therefore were not going to be supported with 'new features' just fixes by ED. No, it doesn't make you a 'hater' IMO because you have clearly enjoyed DCS for a long time, but to give DCS a thumbs down because of certain issues is a bit mean when most of DCS has improved immensely over the years to a point that there is no Flight Sim out there that can touch DCS. Just my thoughts. Mizzy
-
Give this guy a cigar and pin it to the front page, exactly what I have tried to say but not as succinct and all in one post. Only thing I would add is it's plain that RB are using Reddit/Discord to manipulate the narrative because one guy (not Smiley or M2M) goes on and on about why RB hasn't been paid and no matter how many times he's told it's complex and not as simple as that, it just doesn't work. A brick wall and head comes to mind. The other guy comes up with rumour exclusively and tries to pass it on as factual evidence (lol) and his arguments are worth as much as a piece of paper thrown down the toilet. Well done TKhaos, greetings. Mizzy
