Jump to content

Beagle One

Members
  • Posts

    260
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Beagle One

  1. Im really beginning to wonder how ED and 3rd partie are assuming to make any profit out of a game that runs worse with every update. I feel really deterred to invest in any more modules as long as my gaming PC bought in 2014 can't even run the one Module I own. I really dont intend to invest 1000€ all 2 years into new hardware just to run a desktop Simulation game
  2. 1.53 runs noticeably worse compared to last 1.2 Most notably is lots of pauses like the lagspikes we were used in MP, only that this happens in SP too now. I could run 1.2 basically maxed out and now cant even get smopth frames in medium setting. usinf flat terrain shadows and no HDR even removing AA and AF does not really help.
  3. Tracers and SETKA mode works even better for me for A2A gunwork.
  4. I recently bought The Witcher III and before, ArmA III in DVD simply because I refuse to download a game taking two days to download at the 150kb/s maximum I get. Not everyone lives in a city nd even in so calles 1st world contries fast internet is either not available or simply too expensive. I let go of a lot of games I was first interessted in because I could not get them on DVD. I generally don't like the idea of pay to play games by download only. I have made some bad expereinces about that with Iron Front 1944. The publisher is gone and the Install does not work anymore since you cant register the game because ther eis no server to respond. Basically I would have to buy the whole game and addon bundle again on steam by now. I have no problems with free to play games as a downlad only though.
  5. The compass will also show wrong if you pull too much violent manouvers. Its a feature not a bug. The longer you give it time to alling on the ground the better it will work afterwards.
  6. This combined with a programmable keyboard and the quirks of EDs missile logic have made player to exploit the weaknesses of DCS rather than employing so called real world tactics. Air combat is broken for quite a while and I still stick to the su-25a meanwhile doing the dirty basics basically WW2 style because that's at least currently what works somehow (except cluster bombs, still) until the shortcomings in BVR,ECM and missile behaviour are fixed I see no need for new airplanes in my hangar. For just admiring scenery I already have a plethora of addons for FSX.
  7. Rubberbanding is a problem in a lot of games like classical tactical shooters. Often a logic is used to minimize the rubberbanding by softening movement lines by momentum when due to ping a change in movement is not transmitted. But I'ver never seen such extreme effects like in DCS where non moving objects are affected too.
  8. Oben links steht RTL also ist das ganze von vornherein nicht seriös selbst wenn die es Nachrichten nennen.
  9. These mentioned are the Navigation modes, not the radar modes
  10. Mir sind und waren "Clickpits" immer zu fummelig, speziell da ich die virtuelle Kopfbewegung mag. beim KA-50 habe ich ALLE Funktionen außer Beleuchtung und ABRIS auf HOTAS und Panele gelegt. Es gibt für mich keinen vernünftigen Grund die Hand vom HOTAS zu nehmen und mit der Maus einen beglichen Punkt auf dem Schirm zu suchen.
  11. Im really beginning to miss DVD boxes of games. A 8GB downlod is too much even in the 1st world when the girlfriend is running the smart TV and Amazone prime at the same time. Big files need a physical storage. For that reason I just bought a DVD box of Witcher III without hesitation.
  12. It should be also considered that it is always safer to send more planes with less weapons into a mission especially with SARH missiles. I guess that not an appealing idea for online multiplayer games where a lot of people just want to play an ARH bomber. Nothing has changed, 2 Su-27S still beat lonely F-15 quite safely, the same should be good for the Mirage vs. SU-27
  13. The Mirage 2000C shows up as a Su-27 runnign on one engine with assimetric load of french missiles under the wings if you don't own the module. This should not happen in a stable release aimed for introducing the Mirage.
  14. Update worked good so far and fragmented the HDD for 11%... but why are almost all 1.52 Multiplayer servers locked? At least in 1.2 soem were public now it is hard to find 5 public servers at a time and all of them are empty.
  15. Both situations are not comparable neither for the background color nor the position of the sun and therefore, shadows.
  16. I guess as a prelude to a release, the first thing that would go is the Pre-Purchase option. Also, I guess we will se 1.5 stable first to replace 1.2 as a standard version. To base a whole game series on alpha and beta versions only does not sound quite sound.
  17. Ja aber da schon so lange das man sich über nichts mehr wundert. 1.2.09 sollte z.B. zu seiner Zeit doe letzte version sein und alle neuen Module (damals die MiG-21) sollten nur mit EDGE laufen. Wenn man das Spiel mit den verschobenen Terminen und geänderten oder gestrichenen Features schon seit Flanker 2.0 mit macht glaubt man nur noch an das was tatsächlich fertig ist. Betas und Alphas existieren für mich nicht mehr. Den Affenzirkus mache ich nicht mehr mit. Solange es keine neue "stable" gibt kaufe ich auch nicht für Alphas und Betas. Ich bin noch jung, ich hab noch Zeit zu warten. Bei einigen älteren Fans ist es aber möglich das sie 2.0 nicht mehr erleben auch wenn sie vorbestellt haben.
  18. That's not an alien spacecraft. Those are UFP Starfleet class II Type IX standard shuttles. The full module will be available in late 2364, The registration 74656 points to the USS Voyager as mother ship.
  19. It's not that most runways are bad, but its that the low pressure tires can handle unprepared runways... and more important... taxiways full of mud and snow. The Su-27S uses a traditional brake lever not brake pedals and no...you can't assign an axis to the brakes in DCS:W f0r the Su-27S. Because of the digital braking you can blow your tires from 40km/h to a full stop with a empty aircraft which seems quite incorrect.
  20. I can remember pretty well that we had early 80's missions back then in FC2 and the generaö gameflow was better. Now that we have a plethora of 50's-70's aircraft that scenario is even better suited now. F-15 would be retricted to AIM-7 and AIM-9 and no R-77 for the MiG and all "balance" problems be gone. And suddently even the old MiG-21 is back into business as an interceptor. Sabres and MiG-15 were oftten still in service as ground attack Planes back in the 70's in some minor air forces.
  21. In the past, mainly on 104th and 51st Server we had great times with early 80's missions with Su-25A. MiG-29A/G ad AIM-9/7 R-27R/E only. DCS is not restricted to the year 1999. Why should someone buy a MiG-15 or Sabre if DCS is only tailored aroudn the F-15. Mission designers can leave the F-birds completely out of the game anytime like Mirage and Luftwaffe MiG-29G and A-10A vs. Su-27S and MiG-29A/S and Su-25A. Pretty much a 1990 setting. The main reason why the MiG-29 got dismissed so much in DCS was simply due to the ugly 2D cockpit. old meodel and Abyssmal FM. The fulcrum had the worst FM of all the FC3 birds. It was simpy not enjoyable to fly it in any way. That will change soon.
  22. I voted no because simply because I had to buy it.
  23. Im not concerned about Sales or %. What keeps me from purchase is that I want to see 1.5 or 2.0 or whatever it wil be called, as a stable and working and MP ready release... see how it works for me and then I will think about any purchases. Since Flanker 2.0 I have bought the basically same content often enough by now.
  24. funny because that was a feature back in Flanker 2.0 already thaat got lost with FC2
  25. Ich kann nicht mehr ruhigen Gewissens zu Saitek raten. Seit der Übernahme durch MadCatz ist die Qualität im Eimer. Saitek ist nur O.K. wenn man kein Problem damit hat sich alle 2 Jahre alles komplett neu zu kaufen weil Achsen und Schalter anfangen zu spinnen. Auch der Zentrierungsmechanismus im Stick ist alles andere als toll was zu unpräzisen Inputs um den Nullpunkt und im der Mittelstellung herum führt wo sich Reibung aufbaut. Ich persönlich bin wieder zurück bei CH Products....einfach weil es solide und extrem langlebige Produkte sind die man praktisch nur einmal kauft. Allerdings sind CH Sticks sehr altbacken und haben sich in 20 Jahren praktisch nicht verändert bis auf den USB Anschluss.
×
×
  • Create New...