lefuneste01

As I fear, the Quad View is creating issue...I need to dig but it may be tricky to handle it...

Yes this is a reshade addon. I did not notice the blur issue on HUD, it may be tricky to handle as Hud is drawn with alot of shader calls and is not in stencil...

The way to copy the mask from one shader to another is working ! I need now to find a way to handle quad view, check performance, improve the way to manage settings and then re-produce the needed features from 3Dmigoto mod. What are the most important features for you ?

One quick update: the first version of the "reshade DCS VR Enhancer Mod" (VREM) is alive and allowing me to disable the AH64 rotor epileptic flashing, as the TADS view in IHADSS. Of course in OpenXR VR of the MT. I'm working now on the way to get a mask to setup label filtering and some other features. There is still a lot of work before a release.

Do you have OpenXRToolkit installed in addition of VarjoFoveat ? See 2.9.6 quad views foveated Varjo Aero issue under 90fps - Page 6 - VR Bugs - ED Forums (dcs.world) To summarize what I understood: this version put the mess on quad view. It seems Aero users are lucky because they are not as blocked as Quest or Pimax users. But as soon as you have OpenXRToolkit installed, you need to add the new names for DCS in exception list for OpenXRToolkit, otherwise it triggers itself for the "new" DCS and, as it is not compliant with VarjoFoveat makes the game crashing...It worked for me. I know VR is a niche, and eye tracked VR is a niche in the niche, but it should be good to have some feedback from 'officials' on the thread above. Mbucchia did so much to make QuadView working, this is making DCS so great in VR now (well before the last release). But Mbucchia will not anymore do things for us...We can not blame, he did it for free... As far as quad view is off fps are halfed. This is creating some frustration if you do not have an Aero.

FYI I found an issue with the A10CII and the "Optimized Core", light on wingtips were corrupted.. I had to redo the CoreMods\aircraft\A-10\Textures\A10C.zip by using the new one and overwrite the roughmet files by the ones of the library. I hope there will not be other planes impacted...

+1

I did not test and as usually, there are new problems with new versions. So it is likelly mot of the features will be broken. I'm sorry but I'll not spend time on the mod on ST, as this is not the future...

Hello. Unfortunatelly, there is nothing I can do, as the 3dmigoto library itself is no more working with DCS MT...I reported the problem to the developper, he acknologed it, but no news.. I started to look at reshade. I think it will be possible to do things, but reshade is far more complex to use than 3dmigoto, so this is slow... I just did a feature to remove the AH64 flashing "epileptic-friendly" rotor when in cockpit with its shader replacement addon.

I fly both. In the past I left the Apache because of her tendancy to get suddenly mad and bank to the left or right without any good reason. But I restarted to fly her in the last weeks and find her know quite easier to fly than the Hind. I just need to work a bit the force trim to change my heading during hover without wobbling. I have a Rhino DIY FFB joystick with an extension, it may help, but same for the Hind.

Thanks !

I tried to do it using Autohotkey but it is working strangely. The cursor is put at the middle of the screen but go back to the original position as soon as I move my head...As if DCS was not willing to take into account the new position ! Can you share your JoyToKey script ?

Hello, I did multiple tentative but never managed to destroy the 1st target of mission 10 with one bomb. I think I'm targeting the good site, but whatever I hit the big building, the small building or the crates in the courtyard, I need to do a second run. This makes me consuming too much fuel, at the end of the mission, due to the events (I will not spoil), I ran out of fuel and was not able to land on the FARP !

Looks like the same issue than for 3Dmigoto...

This is an issue with foveat : The mask is applied on the viewport linked to eye rendering and not on the viewport linked to global rendering, That's why the mask follow eye tracking and we have a global "NVG" FoV, without capacity to look under NVG, because mask is on wrong viewport. I'll try to provide a screenshot from Varjo tool. But you can not reproduce if you don't have foveat...

Hello, I have varjo foveated installed, and I am able to use DCS with it (as shown by the infamous NVG bug that come back with the last beta), but can also use il2 and MSFS with openXR Toolkit as it is...(I disabled DCS in OpenXR toolkit). I see how you can toggle the OpenXR-InstanceExtensionsWrapper with JSGME, but how do you disable Varjo Foceat ? And, as it is working, without beeing disabled, does it mean you have better performance ?

Hello, big thanks for this campaign. You did it well ! Very immersive, nice usage of radio and dialogues. All missions seems so well made, you are in a war and so you can not do what you want. So you need to contact the good frequencies to be allowed to do what you have to do. But you put the help when needed, so you always know what to do. Plus the great briefings and kneepads...and of course the unexpected events ! One of the best campaign I bought. I'm on mission 5 now. I nearly never finished one mission at the first time, they may be quite long, but as replays are working well now that's not an issue. You make me learn the AV8B more and more with every mission. Only two points: It's a bit frustrating to not takeof with yout wingman iand have to rejoin him/her, but I imagine it is linked to your choice of using only part of the airbase ? I understood your choice for JTAC, but it's too bad there is no feature to allow you to send us target by DL...Not that I do not like create waypoints, but it should have been also a feature to practice.

I did not test but it should be the same than other NVG mod...as written here https://forum.dcs.world/topic/127345-taccas-nvg-mod-for-25/?do=findComment&comment=5325417 it should break the IC...Unfortunatelly my 3Dmigoto mod is no more working for the last 2 OB, otherwise I would have done have something compliant...

Hello, I did a quick workaround available here :

Here is a workaround which will remove the "floating mask" and the blur...Install it using OvGME or unzip it, then copy the content of the "Varjo_NVG_workaround" into the DCS install folder. Varjo_NVG_workaround.zip

+1

Sorry, but I'm not able to reproduce, see the picture below...(The pink rotor is a test I'm doing to disable them by using DCS shader modification..)

It depend of what you are playing, but there are some campaign needed a lot of CPU, so I have a lot of cases where I'm not able to maintain 90 fps with my Reverb. I even meet situation where fps went below 30 fps... And I do not want to lower distance view, landscape detail or other option having CPU impact. Some modules are also fps eater... I did not have the time to fly a lot wiht the Varjo for the moment, but as the reproj is so good I wonder if finally it should be better to lock fps at 45 in order to avoid the small stutter you have when reprojection start or stop (as advised by others Varjo DCS player)...

Hello, I got mine yesterday, installed it and did some quick testings. Same reports as the other, but I didn't understood how the reprojection is good, compared to the one of the Reverb...I'm really in love with it, even if I did only very quick flights. I still need to re activate VRneckSafer and OpenKneeboard to be at my target configuration.

Hello, I'm really happy with my DIY version of Rhino. It works well in DCS, IL2 and MSF2020 (even if I did not try it yet), using the "telemFFB" tool provided for free. This tool provide some addtitional fancy effects in DCS (eg : vibration when firing...). Especially with Helicopter for the force trim, this is a must have. But I understood the delay to get a Rhino "on the shelves" are very very very long. The only negative feedback I read was a guy who wanted more force than the current version. It's possible with the DIY kit, but motor will be quite huge and personaly I do not feel the need.