dedlike.

im abit confused as to how a waypoint wouldnt be enought aswell considering the missile uses LOAL in some cases anyways wich means the TADS (in theory) shouldnt realy be able to tell "what" to look for, only where, i would get it if the agm114l ONLY worked in LOBL with the tads.. but that doesnt seem to be the case

can you also use that to turn on IAT on for george?

my guess is that they stoped working on smal fixes and are probly gonna redo the whole FM / SCAS logic and we wont see a fix on it till that one comes out

if you are playing VR, especaly high res VR headsets like G2, i doubt you would have been CPU limited in the first place, the only thing to help you out here would be a stronger GPU, DLSS is going to be realy interresting for those high resolution vr headsets

isnt nahen the same guy who was arguing that the F15 is far better than the Eurofighter in BVR in the other forumpost? edit: ye found it looks like he just loves to argue

i did hear the same thing about the LJDAM, GBU54, but i didnt see them write about how we shouldnt expect the normal gbu31 and 38s, out of interrest, you think you can find where they wrote that?, kinda dissapointed if true, while i can live without the agm130 gbu15 and such, not having basic jdams is kinda dissapointing

the wait for the IAT was already painfully long, and tbh, im underwhelmed aswell, i was realy hoping that george would finnaly be able to use some from os stabilisation.. well.. sadly not. i do have to agree that things are going extreamly slow , its been realy close to a year now and while it has gotten better, i would say the greatest thing that has been added so far was the IFF for George and Petrovic haha, dont get me wrong, those are great updates its just.. slow i mean about that.. "Added TADS IAT MP sync." i was extreamly suprised that this had to be a seperate patch in the first place out of that huge list.. only few like these are things that we actualy realy get to feel (or atleast i ) Added Multi-Target Tracker ( so far without synchronization for multi-crew W.I.P ). Added Performance Page (W.I.P). and maybe Added main gears collapse into the fuselage after hard landing. however i have to admit that the FCR is a huge undertaking and tbh most likely will make up for the other deficencys that come with the apache in its current state, be it lack of datalink or george not beeing able to use any form of stabilisation

from 8000m all the way down to 3000, while initialy i wasnt sure if the hellfire just doesnt have enough room to turn at 3000m, sometimes it hit just perfect, and it wouldnt explain the other shoots from further away friend and me thought that initialy aswell, and we did try out some different codes without any luck (and making sure it acutally is looking for the right code and not going for secondary etc) one thing to note, it realy seems to be mostly happening on servers with bad ping ( rotorhead in our case ~200ms ) tho im not sure if that should make a difference

Hello! Lately I have been noticing in MP that my friend and me would miss for no good reason, after observing hellfires a bit more today, after they come off the rails, it apears to be that the missile wants to turn into a random direction for a split second before it goes back to tracking the laser, sometimes it doing that will make it miss the target by quite a large distance, the track i got is quite long but half of our missiles would just miss even tho the target is bearly moving, or in some cases not moving at all. we did try a few different laser codes but that didnt help since the track was too large for the forum servers i uploaded it to google drive https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TufMJTgjm_65DEpgVTIamg6w6yEVvx7W/view?usp=sharing

its the image auto track, we got it with the latest update, basicly a point track for the TADS, makes shooting other helis or moving ground targets far easier and reliable however george cant use it atm sadly...

Hello! Just as the title says, i hope one of the devs can coment on this. i was wondering if we could get IAT to work from the Pilot seat esencialy if we had the keybind for it, there used to be a way to add keybinds to a module relatively easy so i was wondering if this idea would work out or if that would make george compleatly freak out since i guess he wouldnt expect it i would test it myself if i still knew how to add keybinds, if anyone knows please tell !

we already have confirmation by the devs that the current FM is wrong and that there should be no roll, so im confident it will get adressed, the question is when

whatever seems like you wont accept anything else than your view anyways

WELL normaly i doupt that you will be cruising around at mach 2.3, simply put, you would only turn on the afterbruner once you get a contact on your RWR or on your own radar, even from 70nm away you wont have time to now accelerate to mach 2.3 untill he already gets to fire at you .. thats why acceleration is inportant... to well... get to your top speeds before getting within missile ranges

im mostly looking forward to it to simply spot things far easyer, shooting behind cover somewhat overrated anyways, since there will be far less opertunities to do so than one might think but even if you attack from behind cover, still doesnt change the fact that you will expose yourself for FAR less time if you already have the TADS slaved to the target ans simply bob up for 3 sec to confirm it, bearly even giving them time to react at all untill you are behind cover again ps: you wouldnt fire at a pure radar contact anyways (especaly if its a wheeled vehicle) since civilians play much more of a role IRL

as far as im aware you can simply slave the TADS to the radar lock, just like slaving it to Targetpoints or other things, so you can lock the target with your FCR and have a look at it in the TADS at the same time

huh, didnt think it was possible to get so much more range out of it compared to the C variants with just beter computers basicly good to know!

i agree when it comes to speed, i dont think the F15 is gona vastly outspeed the eurofighter, and (what matters most in dcs i find) out accelerate, its great beeing able to go mach2.5, not so great if you spend 10min getting there i would rather take mach 2 and get to it in less than 5 min when it comes to the meteor, isnt the aim120-d a multistage missile ? it got the initial booster and when close to the target ignites another booster getting it up to speed again

as far as i know it will get the JHMCS later on, that is confirmed, but as you sayd it does not have any harms, wich is a big downside for me( still going to get it tho) another thing is that the link 16 and the Radar are not exactly combined like in the Fa18, its more along the lines of how the Jeff does it, where you will se the link 16 targets on the SA page but not on your radar page

i wonder if i can get the dampener seperate somehow and fix it onto my vkb lol, are there any writings on it that would indicate a model NR or something along those lines on the dampner?

siliar thing in the apache where it wont display the sat map

considering that goeorge still doesnt know how to use LMC after all those months, i was wondering if we will atleast get the IAT for george at the release or if thats also going to be one of those features that will get added ... later (atleast i dont think we got a statement about that so far, anyone here feel free to correct me)

no, i literallry just put a tor down in mission editor and droped a bomb on it, 2 times, never did it try to shoot it down so i was udner the asumtion that it didnt see them good chance i did something wrong

^ i can confirm aswell, the vid with the phone camara shows it the best, and it reals is this noticeable, while i do hope for a fix soon, i can undestand if the team simply has other thing on higher priority

yeh, lets say that some of the parts brake, considering it isnt realy beeing made by a brand, who knows if you will still get parts in a few years