Jump to content

smnwrx

Members
  • Posts

    356
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by smnwrx

  1. Pretty
  2. I'd fly with you, unfortunately I'm in the pacific time zone and our evenings wouldn't really line up.
  3. Good stuff. Lots of good hiQual movies coming out lately.
  4. Just happend to me on the open conflict server for the first time on 1.5.4, thought I goofed the startup somewhere. Sorry no other useful info other then I guess it can happen in either version
  5. Better then most. Great cinematography!
  6. smnwrx

    GPS UNIT

    I was just pondering this subject while walking the dog today. Haven't seen any news on this since it was revealed it was coming. My guess is it's just one of those things that will show up in one of the updates without much fan fare. Just hope it wasn't/ won't get scrapped. I know I'd put it to use for sure.
  7. For the warthog I set axis to linear then set a deadzone of 13, that way it stays consistent, just a lot more sensitive between the detents.
  8. I don't know much more then the next guy but from what I gather from the recent streams, ED is working on getting old map ready for 2.5. After that, then they're going to go back and finish up Nevada along with the added features. When will that be? Your guess is as good as mine. I doubt they are quite ready to give out ETAs just yet
  9. smnwrx

    No in the F5E

    Sure, may be a lot of frustration if you try to go toe to toe with the FC3 guys, but think of the satisfaction you will get when you get that kill without those gizmos.
  10. To Avoid fighter contact and pass on the info to the CAP. If I'm flying the tiger in a modern arena it will be as a ground pounder with some bite.
  11. Nice job. I usually have Silversun Pickups on in the background while I'm free flying so this is right up my alley. :thumbup:
  12. Haha the call sign and voice actor accent are a bit silly. I like it! Great flying BTW
  13. No worries here brotha. Still can't believe how awesome the mig is. No doubt the future hold even better from LN
  14. That sig tho, works perfectly...or does it?
  15. Here ya go. http://www.belsimtek.com/news/1558/
  16. Understood, I was just pointing out that even though we havnt seen any pics or have much info doesn't mean we aren't close. I'm just as anxious as anyone.
  17. Q: have you ever done an Alantic crossing in the Hog; was it as bad as it seems like it would be?
  18. Yes I know this info is also a year + old but in this Froogle VLOG video Wags talks a bit about developing the ground mapping radar and laying the ground work for future 3rd party developments. Figured it was still relevant for this thread http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=137815 Not going to speculate on why there is so little info since. Leatherneck has an aircraft right around the corner that has a ground radar and we havnt even seen one picture of that. I'm personally taking the fact that ED feels confident enough to give a tentative timeframe as good sign they have made headway in this department.
  19. The more I think about it the less I think it will be the WAAS version of the 430. To me that's ok because I think that would be beyond the scope of what the 430 is being implemented to do, whitch I believe is to help some of the Russian and older aircraft navigate using Gps if they wish to do so. Since as of now DCS is missing many smaller airports and a few navaids I wouldn't expect a full jepp database either. ED can basically just add all the GPS fix points (just imaginary points in space), the nearest airport function, DIRECT function, TERRAIN function. The ability to manually add gps fixes and coordinates and Maybe even the flight plan and OBS functions and that would be sufficient for a combat flight sim IMHO. I don't think it has a reason to be FSx payware quality.
  20. Been awhile since I used one so thanks for the clarification. WAAS is awesome. Like a ILS for small airports. Not many of those on the NTTR map however
  21. Hmm didn't know that. I'm pretty sure those pictures are of terrain, not weather.
  22. Don't think it has the capability
  23. Never seen one in person, let alone flew in one but that cirrus jet is looking nice.
  24. This is how I understood it also
×
×
  • Create New...