Kuky

Bucky, check your PM

Ah sorry about me mentioning the Bonus, my bad... Bonus doesn't apply for KS pre-order but only for modules purchased in ED online shop... sorry again for confusion

But hey, ED also give the bonus for your purchases, so if you spend $100 on modules you get some bonus also, you can use that to get another module at bit cheaper price, I know its not much but its something at least, so you do get little more out then what you pay. EDIT: please disregard this comment, I completely forgot bonus system only applies for modules purchased though ED online shop

yes, people loose perspective because if you think about it, each plane will have great 3D model, cockpit, 6DoF, PFM and ASM, it's the best you could hope for for a flight sim of that high fidelity, and to make those aircraft is pretty hard and long work, so really $20 per plane is not much at all... well I guess it is for people that don't have much money, but if you look at how much general games cost (I think play station games are $80-90 each and their fidelity is not nothing compared to DCS PFM/ASM modules) $20 is not much... I think

I was referring to this post, Sabre is what 1.2.9 is for mostly (1.2.9 = 1.2.8 + Sabre)

No, it won't be.

I think he meant junkies :)

3Sqn RAAF Hornets pKNjiu4j9TM

and when it does it'll come like a thunder :joystick:

Good point... I can add that it applies to ED learning the ropes of modeling/coding and getting info on more modern stuff also, which is harder to come by then prop aircraft :)

nice :D I take 3rd option... MiG-21 I must have, MiG-23 I must have, MiG-27 I must have, F-5 I must have.... the list goes on... and all of them are old airframes

I would like to ask (you don't have to answer, just think about it a little) anyone that asks why is ED releasing WWII planes, choppers etc. If you were a developer like ED, and you were already working on modern aircraft like F/A-18, but were unable to complete such module for few years to come, but you have already cracked the ways to create PFM and ASM for simpler (avionics/weapons wise) aircraft that are also much easier to get right info for, would you: a) continue to work on that modern aircraft only which would mean no income generated for a long time or b) let 3rd part modules (and ED can help also with man-power they have free not working on/parts of the modern aircraft) create the aircraft they have info for, and are able to produce high fidelity modules in fairly short time... and actually generate income while in process of developing the so-wanted modern fighter? yes... now after you thought about, I am pretty sure you said to yourself... I'd pick b) thank you very much ;)

Thank you for the update... any module that is well done (PFM+ASM) deserves to be purchased :)

HAHAHA! Classic!

Well the video wasn't really funny.... not for me anyway.... well, maybe the funny bit was how the rich dude was told off and then wanted to take his pen :D Yup, that was funny! :)

In most countries it's the billionaires that run the show and influence the politicians. I like Putin.

yeah, the $516 is what's on ED website history list, and without indiegogo and kickstarted fundraiser, so real amount I've spent on modules for DCS is over $700 (but as fundraser don't go to ED can't count them) :)

Damn You! Your comment made me laugh like crazy.... and I am at work right now :megalol: Aaaaaaaaaaaaa.... "Kebabistan" :thumbup:

Yes, ED does listen, good on them for making this adjustment :)

Real life (from video's I've seen from Russian pilot that flies on airshows) the Su-27 has some 2sec advantage in turning a full circle compared to the F-15. In game it is also the best fighter for slow turning fights close to the deck. The MiG-29 I am sure is much better in real life than what we have in game (I hope when it gets PFM it will show this) but if you really want to learn how each flies (or just want to be good in one) just fly it... with time you should get the feel for what it can do, and use it where it's good to your advantage.

I have so far spent $516.22 on ED products :D So hey, don't feel too bad about this, its not like something was stolen from you, right? Its just that the way it was setup is not useful for people that already own every module... that's all.

that sums it up nicely... I'm moving on now :pilotfly:

Azref, I pledged $100, but that doesn't change anything. Its still not right to change your part of the deal but not allow me to then also change my part of the deal... its a matter of principle, that's all there is to it. PS: I feel the same upupandaway

So, you see a pattern here? DCS MiG-21Bis fundraiser and now DCS WWII fundraiser... both promised a lot, and both initiators gave up and just went away... not cool... and both times someone else had to step in and rescue the project. PS: 3 posts in this thread from me... I better stop :D

Let me try to answer that for you: - People are asked to pay money for a product and they are promised something, depending how much you want to pay, this is almost like a contract, so both sides need to follow it. The user/buyer however pays the money upfront... and now has to wait... in mean time things change and the other side wants to change their part of the deal. Now where would we be if this becomes a common thing? Why is it alright for one side to not deliver on their promise? the user cannot back up from their payment now can they? So why should the seller be able to change their part of the deal? All I'm saying is, if you promise something, you really should keep your word, if not the TRUST from people will be gone, and that is not a good thing... it is very hard to earn someone's trust again once its lost. And your last quote... that we are crazy to believe ED can deliver... geee.... what a way to put it... so we are to blame for believing? And the person that's in this business and makes such promises (that should know what they are promising is not viable) is not crazy?