Gierasimov

There are great skins for IRIAF, SyAAF, YARAF, IrAF in user files, having said that I also feel the same way At the minimum I hope the 3D model gets final geometry by the EA realese and we will get the template.

Fortunately we can have any country with any livery, but yeah it would be a nice to have to be able to select at least all VVS ones as well as all -A users (Warsaw Pact): Bulgaria, Chechoslovakia, East Germany, Hungary, Poland, Romania - accurate to the time period but also a modern ones from the day one. As for the other operators, let's say 9.12B (export version outside of Warsaw Pact) sure, but for other variants like 9.13 etc users I believe ED would not invest their resources.

Though I keep my Hind and Blackshark in it's original language I don't mind EN labels at all, especially since I intend to mainly fly for Poles.

@BIGNEWY I hope / wish if* you decide to make an official wallpaper in the likes of Hornet, AH-64D, you will consider dark mode users as well please. *more preferably WHEN you decide

Up to the mission maker to decide what weapons are available. Even for MP crowd it's going to be nice. Completely agree with CrazyGMan.

I might want to learn actually!

9.12A never had it, and ED already presented the 3D model of the module itself in the 2024 & beyond video. It's not simply 3D object that needs to be added, remember that one of the systems simulated is the fuel system. As much as I would love to have it as I enjoy AAR it is not going to happen.

I am sure ED will strive to deliver the best Fulcrum - A simulation available to commercial market. The announcement of features to be implemented will be as exciting as the reveal itself

ED store, and probably STEAM at some point, right? Fully public is also the manual for the G version, and quick glimpse at the 3D model ED has provided is us not enough to conclude. Is it 9.12, 9.12A ... We will learn soon enough. Also, what do you call 9.12A with HARM these days? Fulcrum - A.Magnum ?

Considering the first comments around 3 years ago, it must have been, just like with any other module before it's formally announced. As for the radar, look at the @F-2 post in the wish list:

ED said few times that they prefer the community to take care of additional skins due to the cost. If the skin one created is suitable for the module at a quality required, one can approach ED and donate their work and it will be included in the module or asset (AI). It happened in the past on multiple occasions. There is also very strong user files section on the main website.

For sure ED will limit the livery to the operator they are going to simulate and will relay on community to create additional ones. For sure there will be a livery contest and winning ones will be included in the product. Just need that livery template to be released and Fulcrum will get them all in no time!

There is a lot that is not up to the current DCS standards with FC3 MiG-29 and I think (I HOPE) it will be completely NEW 3D geometry / textures / effects.

We don't know but from the 2024 & beyond people could have gotten impression that it will be THIS year, but it won't I think. The development will certainly start this year, or maybe it has already started. Well, EA in December maybe? ED knows Video says in sequence: COMING TO DCS IN 2024 IRAQ AND JOINING REDFOR IN FULL FIDELITY FULCRUM-A The way that this above message is formed shows that Iraq is planned to come this year whereas Fulcrum is planned to join redfor

Probably so, however, we know very much already that even though things might be not in operational use or searchable on the net, it does not make them legally usable for DCS coding. On the other hand it might me a simple case of sales figures versus resources and effort and we might get to see GCI as "post early access feature" Again, what would it change in terms of the gameplay for the simulation - taking into consideration how stuff works in DCS now.

Thanks @CrazyGman, now I know better why the fuss. I could imagine it's close to impossible to find public documents that would allow coding it in DCS. I also don't really see a use case for it in DCS Fulcrum, or maybe for said multiplayer. it would suffice to refresh ATC / EWR / AWACS in DCS. It's currently possible to navigate to your target, work out the intercept yourself and surprise attack with IR without radar and it is much more fun to do so as well. Gen 3 dogfights are fun!

Hi I flew on on my old missions that goes back to June 2022 and was always working fine. However I tried today, as always sending my wingman to execute mission and rejoin. All good, only that after I received "Running in" I heard "Guns Guns Guns" radio call, so checking on my wingy and sure enough he is charging Tor with his 20mm. Why? I checked and my mission is as it was since I created it. Bombing - Decoys - All. I suspected a bug and fortunately I was able to reproduce - track attached. TALD gone wrong.trk

For sure places of cultural or religious significance will not be destroyable as this is the policy for all maps.

@Furiz Happy New Year! The year of Fulcrum!

Razbam hinted their MiG-23 might have the GCI Maybe it will just remain to be simple radio calls we have now - AWACS / EWR.