Jump to content

Silver_Dragon

Members
  • Posts

    12911
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    111

Everything posted by Silver_Dragon

  1. Claims by Kate on discord, about Mig-23 coming to DCS.... (from russian forum).
  2. I thinking, that will be a new 3rd party.... has some rumors on discord.
  3. Artifitial Inteligence, and the (I), I think, will be a F-14B improved (no a D version).
  4. Zeros (IA), F-100D, F-117(IA), Us Infantry and Insurgence (AI), New Nights effets and Weather?, C-130, F4U, Mig-23?, F-14B(I).
  5. New Infantry, Many tanks.... T-34 IA (Finaly).
  6. Dinamyc Campaign, EFA, Mig-29, Germany map, F-35 (New 3rd party?), F-15E FF, Draken (HB?).
  7. And a German NATO airbase. Enviado desde mi CPH2197 mediante Tapatalk
  8. Remember Tornado IDS has on develop by AviaStorm 3rd party and "Germany" map was show on CH-47F videos.... Enviado desde mi CPH2197 mediante Tapatalk
  9. One day more.... Enviado desde mi CPH2197 mediante Tapatalk
  10. Dont miss the point. Build modules has outside from map and assets with diferent tools and teams. To build a module you require a "module team". assets a "assets teams" using the SDK, build maps require a "map team" usdung the TDK (Terrain develop kit). Diferent tools, resources and personal. The only intent to build a "standalone" product end on disaster on a KS and no 3rd party yet have the resourses to build a "complete packages". Enviado desde mi CPH2197 mediante Tapatalk
  11. As posted previously about "priorities": ED has centred on remade and redone the great quantity of old Lomac/FC assets to reach actual standars, and WW2 assets team has centred on PTO units to the release of F6F module. Map teams and module teams has other projects. 3rd parties has own projects with yours "assets teams" (no Octopus-G). Enviado desde mi CPH2197 mediante Tapatalk
  12. I think 15-16 UTC Enviado desde mi CPH2197 mediante Tapatalk
  13. Seamless transition and map interconections has not plausible with actual map technology, that require ED release the whole earth map technology on progress first. Actualy ED or a 3rd Party has working on a Germany modern map, but no more news has been release them. No plans yet to new WW2 west/east front Maps. Enviado desde mi CPH2197 mediante Tapatalk
  14. What "unmaintained" modules? Enviado desde mi CPH2197 mediante Tapatalk
  15. Wags claim some years ago about M1 tank interiors and data but none was confirmed. The main ploblem Will be the lack of any support to make a FF vehicle on DCS, no tracks, armour, weapons and System implementes on core (thah require a true vehicle team on ED) and Big changes on maps, featured and funtionality on the DCS Core... 3rd parties has none to do here meanwhile ED dont move there. Enviado desde mi CPH2197 mediante Tapatalk
  16. Octopus-G has none confirmed about a "assets team" and/or a "map team" and no talked about more content to the La-7. Other 3rd parties has none confirmed about east front WW2 content and ED has none plans yet, centred on WW2 PTO (Marianas WW2, PTO assets, F6F module) as M3 3rd Party (F4U module and PTO assets). About opponents... La-7 has a Jun 1944 Air craft, a Fw-190A-8/D-9 Will match. Enviado desde mi CPH2197 mediante Tapatalk
  17. The pic coming from a famous "Clickbait/Drama" reddit Page.... None to see here... Moving "Facepalm and Zero cledibility"..... Enviado desde mi CPH2197 mediante Tapatalk
  18. Napalm, incendiary effects has planned by ED, waiting news. Enviado desde mi CPH2197 mediante Tapatalk
  19. Someone remenber a team working on Su-17?
  20. By the CSS Discord FaQ: On fact CSS has no plans yet to a WW2 map
×
×
  • Create New...