JB3DG

Hi guys Whenever i switch to one of the AI aircraft in a mission in FC3, I can no longer turn on that unit's radar which makes most of my weapons useless. Any ideas?

Ah ok my apologies. Still a major change from what he used to be though :D

Mower helping a noob get set up on FSX....what a paradigm shift!

Speaking of spiders....

Its the FSL bus that will not disappoint...judging from the feature list they may just outdo PMDG and all the rest.

I believe it requires a special connection between it and the aircraft in order to transfer the target position before release. No wireless here...

Crap damn...for real? Although i would hate to see the price of restoration...

Lol you would be suprised how often the top proffessional programmers make typos...

How about fixing the glass one as well?

The TGP must be the SPI though (TMS forward long).

What will you charge to make a F-15E stick and throttle grips? I might be able to do the electronics myself (not rely on thrustmaster).

The AGM-84E is not rocket powered. Its a small jet. And no afterburner.

Sending ya PM so we dont derail this thread any further :) .

I fly both (hell i even develop for one) and i see equal potential and capabilities for both sides. Do I still not know what I am talking about ;) ?

I normally take out my development frustrations on tanks and SAMs in DCS A-10 and Su-25T, Migs in FC3, or a session in the good ole Worms 3D. Command & Conquer 3 Tiberium Wars is another option (only on really bad days)...I usually totally wipe the floor with Scrin and Nod forces (Love doing so with the GDI Mammoth).....

Some of them may have hung by their necks but I know NONE of them hung by their tails!(what tails?) :lol:

Dont you mean an Extra 300 :lol:

No he isnt confused. He is like Vader. He has come back from the dark side :P

If he changed underpants like his sims then they would have fallen off long ago as they would be rags.

There is a GBU-24 variant (not in DCS) that does use the Mk-84 though if i recall correctly.

I am up with CA, FC3, and A-10. UTC+2 so i can easily fit in. Been really eager to get some good CA missions and MP work

Another version: "hawg 1-1, what's your currant tasking?" "a s***ty one"

Try using a VPN like Wippien. I have a 384Kb/sec cellphone (I am in South Africa) connection and it is lagless with TACPAC over Wippien. :D

Diss? I said FEW. Take note. FEW. Out of all the FSX devs out there, is 3 or 4 a lot? I also said "until recently"....which means more devs are starting to think outside of the box. Please do not misquote me like that. Besides the point was not how lacking in skill some devs are, the point was that a lot of these "limitations" and "difficulties" are actually misconceptions.

I meant the FSX SDK combined with the TACPAC SDK. SimConnect would deal with the AI triggers and such. Bottom line of any AI system is to control the direction of flight which means that the actual AI logic would have to be written from scratch. TACPAC SDK would just be the means the arm them. As a full time developer, I can assure you it is possible. @aaron It would be no different than when you have your AI traffic sliders around 20-30%. Good frames are still possible. Bottom line: The only limits are skill and imagination. Which until recently very few FSX devs have had. Thats why these misconceptions about FSX limitations exist.