Jump to content

59th_LeFty

Members
  • Posts

    460
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by 59th_LeFty

  1. IRL you have an other indicator for it - the swicth position that slews it :) For the HUD repeater, 9.12 version clearly has only that function. My question is, that which was the first version, that had the difference from that? 9.13 is the biggest concern in regard of DCS. Stripped from its MFD capability, many would think twice to prefer the Flanker or active missiless in servers :)
  2. It should be the work of the ACS to prevent you from such thing, however I havent flown a Flanker yet to know how it works IRL. Could happen, but I would be surprised. Dont consider these aircrafts as F35 where you are literally unable to do dumb things, and fall down the sky as a result.
  3. Love this thread. :D This thread in short: New guys, just simply beleive the veteran guys, because they have seen enough to say what they say, and have their reasons. DCS in its current form is far more in BVR than we could have ever hoped for, the only true missing thing is datalink for F-15 to make it a 90's fight. Please god never go beyond 2000s where this simulation gets like "EASY MODE ON". An AESA for instance does pretty much that. As Blaze said, even the datalink for Eagle may shift balances too much. On ECM: consider lagging an effective way of it ^^ It's pretty much the same result Besides, arguing on whats when entered service is pointless. This sim could have never happened in real life. Just a few notes, why: - F-15C with APG-63 baseline ended in '86. And we are having that. - Still, we are having 120C, which is 1996 stuff. - R-27ER/ET is faaaar within 90's stuff, Flankers could not fight with them for a decade, while Eagles would spam 7Ms since 82. (LOL, Flankers were not even service that time) - don't even mention new modules like Ka-50 and A-10C (2005), thats LOL to argue about them why within one sim. Enjoy them and prey that this not changing. (God, just once, I'd like to see a single F-22 in the 104th . . . cheaters)
  4. Sometimes we sim pilots got confused of what is a bug and what is a feature, don't blame yourselfs guys :D Looking forward to 6DOF Fulcrum too... Until that, play with the Flanker, its great!
  5. One more goes to beczl!
  6. I've made my training video for lanindg already https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1LZbgvs-1H8&feature=youtu.be How NOT to do it.
  7. http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?p=2053590#post2053590 BTW - what does that mean Predaor radar was removed? It won't detect units in ffog of war? Or there was RWR signal from it?
  8. Hello guys! I have a bit similar problem, I hope you can help. I have changed from saitek rudder to CH, and vice versa in an other PC. None of them seems to apply the rudder. CH is not even detected in DCS. The Saitek is detected, but has axis JOY_X, JOY_Y, JOY_RZ, and RZ assigned to Rudder causes error. If the axis leaves the deadzone a little bit, it steers the rudder axis instantly to maximum value. There is no real axis, its like a button. Hardware calibration looks good.Anyone has an idea? Thank you! ... deleted saved games inuput and DCS/Cofig/Input folders entirely, repaired DCS, still don't work. Configuration still OK. No Idea.
  9. This new HUD is really too late for an April 1st joke... ED, please... After 10 years I expected more...
  10. Hello guys! Good to see that such knowledge is in one place! I am troubling with a 3 monitor setup here, in a 3*1920*1080 configuration (5760*1080). No lua hacking, only switched to "3 Screens" setting in the options menu. The only problem is that in any graphics setting, I get some shuttering in the motions. If I switch back to "1 Screen", all the 3 monitors are working and the shuttering goes - but of course the aspect and zoom limits are too bad for the 3 monitors. Any guesses?
  11. I may find this interesting. I already operate a full motion car sim. Can I ask for your location please? Some pics would be nice, yes :)
  12. Everyone is getting it with 50kbps (est time 10hrs) or is it just me?
  13. A good landing it is :) The perfet one is when the aircraft is still flyable afterwards. Thanks fo the Vid! Anyone tried multiplaeyer stability?
  14. Can we get his thing work on openbeta non-steam release? The only problem i found is that it installs the TacviewExportDCS.lua file at c:\Users\myuser\Saved Games\DCS\Scripts\ folder instead of \DCS.openbeta\Scripts\
  15. An experience we waited for a looong time! Thank you guys on behalf of 59th Virutal Air Base, see you next time!
  16. Thank you Sir for the reserves! As I understand there will not be Teamspeak server available for this scenario? If there won't, then where and when we can expect details on roster and server access? Thank you!
  17. 3-4 A10C pilts from 59th are also expected, do we have room for them? So full would be 2-3 fighters (MiG-29 preferred, but russian strict) + 2xSu-25A/T + 3-4A-10C
  18. 59th is in with 2-3 MiG-29A/S if possible, and 1-2 Su-25A/T, sorry for being late :) And as I see, RED side it is. Thank your for the host, looking forward to it!
  19. Looks interesting! 59th will surely reserve some seats! Can we know what is the player limit? Or it is yet to come? Cheers!
  20. R73 does just fine, as I've seen, tested against a parallell flying target 45°offset, missile hit just fine.
  21. Same questions here, please Ragnarok :)
  22. I can not tell you for russian MiG-29s, but basic export versions does not tell you target speed and alt information, regardless of mode. Not even in "BVR".
  23. Occured to me as well, this is pre-update1 1.2.7. No info if he was going burner, but cpeed was not changing after so I guess not. Also, one more thing for the EOS, it has laser for target distance measurement. But from pilots stories it is not useful over 10-12km. No idea about how the range mechanics working, I will ask.....
  24. Thank you! Cool&quiet solved it. But come on, really this is the only way? DCS sux...
×
×
  • Create New...