Bucic

Yeah, I got it on my today's to-do list.

nVidia user here. I won't be resetting driver settings for that but I did clear out the "metashaders2" and "fxo" folders. I even had a studio driver update in the meantime. The difference is very clear - pre vs post breakage. Yes, there may be some difference between off and MSAA x4 but to a rather little degree. The best indicator is the F-5E under-HUD console. When you're affected and have head bob enabled for the cockpit view you get a constant marching shimmering on that console.

Thanks. What about Intercept? By my notes they ignored the targets in intercept as well.

Is it described in DCS manual? Is it required to tune to local ATC freq for ground communications to work?

This! ED should state that "In case of F-5E we're doing <this><that> and in case of any future module the feature set is at our discretion, to be communicated." And that's it. Don't like it, don't buy it. It's getting tiresome, even having unsubscribed from most of the discussions on this particular subject. On the night cockpit lighting, I will report it soon. Just monitor the 'Bugs and Problems' for the F-5E or follow my profile to get notified.

I find it trully amusing how it doesn't get to some that their wants are subjective. - Swiss didn't have it? Well, Northrop was able to! Wasn't? Erm... If it can be mocked up with cardboard, ED should have the decency and at least program it in! So preoccupied with wants that you haven't even noticed that night ligting... doesn't work for side panels. But yeah, we can't let ED get away with a non-functional piece of dorsal antenna

Instant Action - Cold Start?

@Evg85Try searching for: parking kit service access covers in different categories, using the search function in the control settings.

Or am I just dumb?

What does it show?

Even the basic lighting is broken so...

I tried with fighters and transport aircraft, USA offensive, China defensive. The units ignore each other. Neither F-4 nor the F-5E were engaging. It's the simplest mission possible with no variables. I just wanted to see if only F-5 has ugly tracers. Default coalitions used. Tested with CAS and Intercept role vs Transport. Then tried to switch the Transport An-26 for CAS RED Su-27, same results. Also, when the Blues overtake the Reds, the Reds also ignore them. bug ME fighters BLUE RED ignore each other CAS NTTR.trk

The guy has posted an excerpt from the actual maintenance manual. Also, a swiss documentary titled 'Helvetic Tiger' contains a scene from actual fire tests. At least one. https://forum.dcs.world/topic/153180-reportedgun-dispersion/page/2/#findComment-3171628 About relative differences: Please re-investigate the issue. For anyone wanting to investigate on their own, in accordance with a post by @Aries144 Posted December 23, 2017 New information incoming. I just discovered that it is possible to freeze the aircraft using active pause, decelerate time using alt z, and shoot the cannon in slow motion with no movement of the aircraft. This will make the next videos posted here as accurate as if the aircraft were stationary on the ground! Other references: @GGTharosmentions M39 here, plus other M39 mentions https://forum.dcs.world/topic/168522-bug-report-f-15-gun-accuracy-does-not-match-sources https://forum.dcs.world/topic/155394-f-5-gun-dispersion/ cannon mod https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3151874/ ED @NineLine@BIGNEWY@USSR_Rik@Mr.Pitt@f-18hornet SME @Kev2go @Gianlc@VPS_SPIT@GGTharos U @LazerPotatoe@Ramsay@Sarge55

I have made CapeFrameX captures for DCS 2.9.10.4160 - 11.12.2024 and DCS 2.9.12.5336 - 20.01.2025 for both, the trees issue and the F-5E stutter issue. I know the latter is fixed already but for the trees I'm going to load up a comparison tomorrow. EDIT: Basically, no difference at all. I guess ED is still investigating.

@gulredrelUsing MSAA by any chance?

Geeez...

@HansPeter1981You seem to be splitting hair. For most in this topić the shimmering is massive and is equivalent to MSAA being "almost off". I can even see YouTubers being affected by this bug, despite the videos being decompressed twice.

I went throught the errors one by one. Looking good now! It seems the team did away with overtemp switches. Honestly I see no problem with that

Here's case number 673 of how my convoluted commenting serves no one, sorry I wasn't referring to morality at all. Not to mention law has very little to do with morality. I was merely pointing to the fact that a different look of a certain effect, nor its fluidity, points to use of this or that graphics API. That's all.

Even if they look different... It's not forbidden by law to e.g. increase particle density, size or use an outright mod for explosions and smoke edit: for the purpose of a promotional video.

I was really hoping the F-5E is going to be the first jet to have the landing gear (tire-strut) modeling updated this year as it's got the freshest 3D model so I thought the animation guys prepared the model already.

It's called activities, as in the program inner doings

Is it safe to update now?

Is it safe to update now?

Trees notably absent from the today's update changelog. Could anyone verify by flying up close to trees, pausing and moving the camera?