Jump to content

sorcer3r

Members
  • Posts

    1215
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by sorcer3r

  1. sorcer3r

    1.2.3

    Mit 1.2.3 will ED sich ja auch mit den MP-Problemen auseinandersetzen. Vielleicht schaffen sie es diesmal und alles ist gut. Wenn nicht, muss man halt noch ein bisschen warten. Auf die paar Monate kommt es dann auch nicht mehr an. ;)
  2. on my laptop:
  3. more important. Who is making the mi-24? :worthy:
  4. Ise, frag doch ma einen von STP, die wissen das sicher...
  5. +1 With this feature it would be easier for us to live withouth a DC. ;)
  6. @Eagle-Eye, thx for the pn. :) Sorry for the late response... :D Here is an old version. Open the missions with DCS World mission editor and save it. I hope they will work (tanker/awacs can cause problems in 1.2.2?). Some of them require Slmod now. http://www.file-upload.net/download-7027254/redsnake.zip.html I also have modified the marco polo mission for combined arms but this version is not included yet. We tested it with 1.2.0/1 and had a lot of client crashes/disconnects and warping. I will test it again with 1.2.3 and maybe when the Huey is released I will fly dcs again and then I will see how we can use that chopper in these missions. ;)
  7. This feature would be also nice for dcs....
  8. Maybe not LA to Tokoyo but perhabs from Aviano airbase to Belgrade or Kuwait to Afghanistan. Current DCS theater is for a chopper sim big enough but I guess for a fixed wing aircraft we need larger theaters.
  9. If tracks are not broken, yes its possoble. Needs a lot of time to update the mission file. (1-2 weeks) There is already a online campaign for that: http://forum.51st.org/viewforum.php?f=45 Worked well with BS1 + FC2. Campaign will be continued when DCS world is stable and FC3 is final afaik. So you just need a lot of patience... ;)
  10. IMO we need a game save feature for this. when server crashes or has to be restarted we will lose the mission progress and thats a bit frustrating... ;-)
  11. I have read from a former F-18C pilot that F-16s used 120s against them in dogfight mode. I guess you shouldnt underestimate them in close range.
  12. +1 I have an old 19" crt and smart scaling helps a lot.
  13. Most of the other 3rd party devs start with less complex aircrafts to learn how DCS works. For the first belsimtek addon the huey is a good choice IMO. :) the huey flight model in DCS could be much better than the FSX FM. (and I guess it will get better ;))
  14. Enough time for the wingman if he is good enough. ;)
  15. Agree.. maybe politics? (almost an argument against the ka-50. Dont take him away from me ;) ) And also everyone is talking about the 120C and 27E but there are different 120C versions and it seems also different 27E versions. Anyway its interesting to read here.
  16. Yes. IMO there is no need for a HARM against a Sa-8. Only if you dont know its postion exactly or/and you are ambushed by them. So maybe there is a need for (H)ARMs... ;)
  17. Not if thats true: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R-27_%28air-to-air_missile%29 Maybe someone just needs to do a "chinese addon" :smartass:
  18. But they seem to have active radar R-27 and for sure R-77 (also in falcon).
  19. Maybe Chinese Su-27 / R-27 versions is what you need. It seems that their R-27s have active radar seekers. (Could be the reason why you get only a "pitbull warning" in falcon ;) )
  20. Someone translated a part of a Mig-29 manual in bms forums: If thats true 10 seconds would be almost correct. (for R27E)
  21. Lass dich von sowas nie in die Irre führen. ;)
  22. I remember a Mi-8 (?) Video with the nevada terrain. I hope they talked about a Mi-24. :D
  23. Mit welcher Remote-Software arbeitest du?
  24. Copy. Maybe you have only to disable spam protection on the server.
  25. 1.2.2 nur kurz mit dem Shark angetestet. Nach 15 Minuten Bild eingefrohren. Wenigstens wars nur ne Viertelstunde, die ich sinnvoller hätte im Viperpit verbringen können. ;)
×
×
  • Create New...