sorcer3r

They have used only about 10% of their power to get to the final. They have used about 75% to win the final. :D

pure domination. maybe they will win all the titles over the next 10-15 years :)

IMHO its not a new feature. In DCS A10C you have always to switch on the JTAC's frequency. This feature should not be removed plz. :)

Outcome should be the same (if buildings stay destroyed etc.) . But Gamesave sounds easier ;). Maybe there is a 3rd party out there for modding a "gamesave" addon? :D

Just an ingame save option and we are a huge step closer to a DC. Would that be such hard to implement? :notworthy:

If I want to fly a combat helo I jump into the Ka-50 (as soon as upgrade users get access to world ;)). If I want to fly a multiole jet I jump into the F-16. Thats the simmer's heaven. :)

Would be nice if we will get that. And a DC needs IMO also a larger theater. But all of this takes years. And right now one of my most wanted features is stability. Thats one point why I prefere bms these days. You can run a campaign server for days without any crash.

Me too, just not to prove anything ;) But for DCS a F-18 would be better. Naval ops would make the "small" Caucasus theater a little larger.

Hm, IMO with coded FLCS, new physics enviroment (jet blast, turbulences etc.) their AFM is the best we can have for a fast mover. (for now ;)) I use the T.E. only for some training flights. Focus on DC is a good decision because for everything else we have the DCS mission editor. Cant wait for Grimes OnStation with a F16/18 :D Until now there is no DCS F-16. So there are no facts for your presumption ;)

From what I've read in bms forums I dont think this will happen (unfortunately!). There seems still to be some avionic stuff in development for the next major release and also their F-18C will be upgraded etc. So there is no time for modding in DCS. (And IMO they werent satisfied with working only on a SFM ;)) But their F16 is a good reference for all DCS jets coming. :thumbup:

Yes, this would be awesome. :thumbup: But I guess we dont need this feature before a DCS F16/F18/Tornado release ;)

I guess netcode isnt a problem (but we will see how it runs with more clients when FC3 is released). More important is the server/client stability. Only unpleasant issue I had (1.1.1.0/1) was about the incorrect flightpath of some missiles (against client Ka-50.) But maybe solved since 1.1.2.0.

- Battle Commander can save the mission progress. - Battle Commander can edit the briefing during the mission. - Battle Commander can put new units on the map (reinforcements during the mission). Then we will have more than just "missions" ;)

:no_sad: DCS is not a poor game IMO. Especially in MP you can have a lot of fun. (if it runs stable). And also F4 BMS is not a worse sim than DCS. There is no DCS F-16 (yet). So we can't really compare.

Some A10C were also in Libya. And they did some ground attacks. (tanks, buildings, supply convoys?) So thats also a realistic type of missions as talib-CAS missions are. But in the A10 I have most fun with CAS. And in the F16 I have more fun with strike stuff.

Wrong. "open" beta. :p Where exactly should there be a financial loss?

IMO its not good enough. (except open beta does not take longer than a week ;)) Still easiest way: Provide upgrade users on dcs.com with BS2-full keys if they show their BS1 keys.

Yes, I enjoy my "signature's simulation" whilst i wait for the final. :D

Seriously? After what has happened now? :lol:

;) Naja, dann den Fullbesitzern viel Glück und viel Erfolg beim Betatesten. :thumbup: Hoffe da finden sich genug, die den MP auf Herz und Nieren testen können. (Bei uns haben die meisten glaube ich nur die Upgradeversion.) @Kaufi Sehen wir es positiv. Während sich andere auf Bugsuche begeben dürfen, können wir ganz sorgenfrei BMS genießen. :pilotfly:

Welcher ungefähre Zeitraum ist für die Betaphase angesetzt?

Besitzer des BS2-Upgrades scheinen vom Betatest ausgeschlossen zu sein. :thumbup: :doh:

ED could you give us BS2-full keys if we send you our BS1+BS2-upgrade keys?

We have a IVC-serverapp running on a server. It seems that IVC is also based on TS3 . So ED/Headspace just has to make TARS standalone and put it into DCS-world installation. Sounds easy (for someone who has no idea of software development ;))

Yes but in MP each client has his own group which is not so comfortable.