Jump to content

JunMcKill

Members
  • Posts

    1095
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by JunMcKill

  1. I know, but so far the mig29 is flying as intended. I remember watching a documentary about dogfights during Desert Storm, that either Captain Cesar Rodriguez or Captain Craig Underhill said that they were always told not to engage in a dogfight with a MIG-29. So far, the F-4s I've encountered at close range haven't had a chance to escape!
  2. I think the aircraft should remain as it was in real life, despite all the disadvantages it had, including the fact that information about it was in the hands of Western intelligence due to espionage activities carried out by Adolf Tolkachev. In my opinion, this aircraft should be simulated on servers that represent the era in which it was operational.
  3. But I want to select one of the prebuilt missions in the main menu, in that mode you cant access to the editor to enable the NS 430. Look,what ED did was a bad idea, the option should be activated via ON/OFF in the special tab in the options menu! thats all! It doesn't work in INSTANT ACTION, nor in QUICK ACTION GENERATOR, and is not be visible in MP missions if the creator has not activated the NS 430 either!
  4. It works in VR? looks like is not a flat 2D screen!
  5. Bad news, it seems my short stay outside of DCS will become a permanent vacation.
  6. How do you know it's an SU-33? The differences between the two aren't visible in the image. That is, engines, cockpit, radar, etc. Unless you designed the banner
  7. I agree with you, in fact I wish to see the one of the DCS banner (I think is the J-15) fully simulated!
  8. May the god of aviation hear you!
  9. I just quit DCS a while ago. I will only return when they release something from the east. Tired of DCS western club.
  10. It's not easy to get into a MiG-29 with no SPO, lack of maintenance, faulty radars and no GCI (the backbone of Soviet air doctrine), to fly and fight in the visual style of World War II in the 90s! Everyone who flies the 29 in DCS knows that it's instant death, I've already seen the video, it's impressive. (Video with english subs below)
  11. I love the damn GTA, and this return to a Vice City style and years, it is a must buy! goodbye to DCS for ... another while!
  12. Cuban MIG-29 armed 4 x R-73, 2 x R-60MK Cuban MIG-29UB
  13. The MIG-29SMT is the upgrade package for both original airframes and can carry R-77, quote from Wiki: "The MiG-29SMT version is an upgrade package for the first generation MiG-29 (9.12 to 9.13) containing many of the improvements developed for the MiG-29M. Additional tanks included in a larger dorsal hump provide a maximum range of 2,100 km (without external tanks). The cockpit features improved HOTAS-type controls, two 152 × 203 mm color LCD multifunction displays and two smaller monochrome LCD displays. The upgraded Zhuk-ME radar offers similar characteristics to the MiG-29M. The engines are upgraded to the RD-33 Series 3 that offer an afterburning thrust of 8,300 kgf (81.4 kN) each. The weapons load is increased to 4,500 kg on six underwing pylons and one central pylon, with armament options similar to the MiG-29M variant. This update is also focused on accepting avionics and weapons of non-Russian origin."
  14. This is another kind of beast, ++++ far from the MIG-29A. Smokeless engines, extended flight range with more fuel, MFCDs with datalink and air to ground capability, R-77 and another new weapons, a new radar, air to air refueling. Ufff. Is like the SMT, the K or the Peruvian SMP
  15. If ED waits for RAZBAM's MIG23 we will never see the MIG29 this year, those guys have been in the project for years and are far to deliver. Anyway I will buy both models, but I have hope in ED to deliver this year. Everything of the actual FC3's MIG29A can be reused, why not? the cockpit is ok, only needs to change a few things, the PFM is ok, the ordnance is the same. The only real changes are in the avionics model, some HUD elements are different and that's all. For example, the SPO-15 RWR functions are different than the actual FC3 russian RWR, I hope they simulate the real one like the MIG-29 9.12 manual. By the way, the SU-27S manual is online too, and the US airforce have been using them as redfor for tears. Time to release that one too!.
  16. Just let me know where I have to pay! Looks like the version will be the Russian 9.12 (the online manual)
  17. It seems that the mig 23 has been left further behind in the row of projects, please someone wake me up when there is a pic of the finished cockpit.
  18. =LoneWolf= RuSh - JF-17 Blue team
  19. Sorry guys, I have to cancel due personal problems, one red MIG-29A is now available See u in the next match! RuSh
  20. I wonder how many people have ever read an ED manual, I mean, compared to the people who fly a DCS module. In my years flying simulators, the average of those I know come to ask first how to do this or that, or to watch videos on YouTube, than to read a manual. Many here have given extreme importance to this, in a digital world in which documentation can be done in a thousand ways, and not necessarily written. :book:
  21. RuSh - MIG29A
  22. Hi guys, I changed my original post to Blue Cmdr to balance the tournament RuSh
  23. RuSh - Blue cmdr (no rain) EDITED
  24. Thanks to the 104th and the organizers, in particular Tiger for the event! Was awesome.
  25. RuSh - MIG29A
×
×
  • Create New...