Jump to content

JunMcKill

Members
  • Posts

    1091
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by JunMcKill

  1. yes is complete off topic
  2. Was a great event, sorry I couldn't finish for problems at work!. Thanks to the 104th guys for the servers and their time.
  3. This^^, From the first time I used discord, I realized that this is not the right communication tool to work in teams. It is true that he has a voice, but everything else is as if it were an extension of whatsapp, with the same problems porn, chat and BS, I think that for DCS, the best comm apps are teamspeak and SRS.
  4. If you do the same with the M2000's Matra 530 you are dead!, AFAIK, the 530 is the best SARH missile in ED right now.
  5. I know is broken, as I know that if you want to shot down someone with a R-27ER, I have to launch it at 8km maximum, I play daily in the 104th server in MP, and the ER use is only for persuation, in order to make the other aircraft begin defensive maneuvers, not thinking in a kill, because the Pk is almost ZERO!
  6. Meanwhile ED continues working on western missiles :D
  7. This video is better! :lol:
  8. You're right, mine is not working at all, a wasted money.
  9. No one knows if that is the Rmax, I consider that the chart marks the distance where the missile flight profile have a good Pk and not the Rmax. In this case, the chart say that a missile launched at 1100 km/h speed and 10km high, can kill at a non manueverable aircraft at 70 km away. Anyway, is a simple chart for weapons deployment in the SU-27SK, not a complete study of the missile. This is the manufacturer data: http://eng.ktrv.ru/production/military_production/air-to-air_missiles/r-27r1_-_r-27er1.html
  10. Where in the book? I have the russian version and only talks about the missiles specs and launch parameters, pylons positions, etc but no chart or study about the ER per se.
  11. Why not? where is the proof? I have no seen any chart related to ER/ET flight and tests, like the AIM-120 published online. All references are from the old R/T models
  12. Remember that the Russian scientifics are dumb, and don't know how calculate an interception profile for a missile. They have been sending rockets to ISS eventually with pure child maths, not rocket science :D
  13. The MIG-23-98 was a project Cubanace began a while ago, but he paused it to develop the SU-57. I have to no interest in the MIG-19, will wait for the MIG-23MLA or any latest model. I simply stopped buying ED's western aircrafts, not because I dislike them, but for the lack of red complete modules in ED
  14. was a great battle, the server stability of 10!, was incredible to watch the aircrafts taxi over the carrier deck with no lag or warp!. COngrats to the organizers in particular the 104th guys and the people who work as ATC and GCI RuSh
  15. What is 100% real is that the carrier based MIG-29K, can carry KH-31A and Kh-31P. There are several videos of Star telechannel showing them aboard the Kuznetsov.
  16. Sorry Tiger, JunMckill is RuSh, I'm already signed in a SU-33, not F-18 Regards! RuSh
  17. Looks amazing but expensive!
  18. These documentaries are later translated to english and aired in RT with the name COMBAT APPROVED.
  19. Looks amazing!
  20. What position are u using to take off? and what fuel and weapons loadout? I have no problem to take off from position 1 and 2 with special AB, full ordnance and 59% fuel
  21. In my case in VR is only showing the upper bar! when they will fix this?
  22. Read this ofCross https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=216475
  23. Hi Rik, any answer from the developers about VR and NS 430?, the year is almost ending and they couldn't fix that thing?
×
×
  • Create New...