JunMcKill

YEah you did a great job guys, If it were not for you, the strikers would not have made so many kills

Ahhh thats why he apeared in red in tacview later?

I count eight targets in tacview and when I was in game was the only with eight kills, ask the other guys! Anyway my eight kills are visible in the tacview with no doubt. Im not claiming the module or the price or whatever, just to be fair with the figures

Sorry the tacview is corrupted I destroyed eight targets (was visible in the roster in DCS) and tacview, three is the first pass, two in the second, and three in the third =EDP 71st= Rush

Good for this one Maverick, I have seen Cessna and F-5 with simple eye about 5 miles far perfectly, but in game is impossible to see the F-5 more than 800 meters away! Test the more realistic model enlargement please!

You're right, I think that is to balance the event, since the F-5 can carry only two A2A missiles at a time.

=EDP 71st= RuSh EDP 71st Cuba_mexico MIG-21bis

Was a great event, thanks to the guys who organize it, and to all participants

Please set the enlargement model at least in SMALL, with the model in OFF is impossible to see the F-5 until he is at 500 meters away! The MIG-21s are perfectly visibles at 2 or 3 kms By the way the R-60M is worst than the AIM-9P5, I think that the MIG-21 should go with R-13M1 Is There AWACS or EWR? or human CGI?

Could be, is a museum aircraft!

In the Kunz picture you see that the MFD is not equal to the vanilla SU-33 (in the picture the MFD have buttons below like the A-10C/F-15C MFDs), the original SU-33 MFD was like the SU-27 (pic below) Now the SVP-24 MFD in MAKS 2005 is the one of this picture and is 12 years old now

LOL this is the best, if you are in a flanker or MIG-29 NEVER go to merge against an A-10C! :D you're dead! I've been playing in blue flag and have to run in all the encounters vs A-10C! :helpsmilie:

Use the Voice Activated Command (VAC), or the VoiceAttack software, you can say the voice command that execute several keys in the order you want. I use this for ATC control, when I say in the mic: REQUEST ENGINE STARTUP, the software "click" this keys: CTRL-} to close the radio menu and return to first screen } to open de radio menu F5 to select ATC F3 to request engine startup

=EDP 71st= RuSh EDP 71st Cuba-Mexico SU-25T

You're right, the radar rebound signal when chaff is deployed should affect the aircraft radar! (as is IRL, but not in DCS), and yes is an AN/APG-65

Read this article about how chaff works! http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/systems/chaff.htm

AFAIK, The monopulse seeker is the only way of guidance of both the R-27R and R-27ER, they receive the rebound radar signal all the time, and his software make the corrections during flight to intercept the target. US RWRs already knew about the guidance frequencies and details of russian radars thanks to the information adquired from a Russian Engineer since the 70s to 1985. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_Tolkachev

As Rage stated, this is a very old discussion here in DCS, we have written lots of pages here in the forum, looking for a better modeling of all missiles guidance, but is futile! I agree that the R-27R have short legs, but the guidance is not that bad, even in interviews of US pilots that flew the German MIG-29G, they remark that.

Anyway the SNP2 have been a waste of missiles from the beginning, never hit the targets any of the missiles. At the same time, it's bad simulated the radar mode, IRL to launch ARH missiles to more than one target, the radar doesn't need to LOCK on one of the aircrafts (as is now in the game), in fact the radar use the same principle of the F-15 TWS, making a volumetric continue scan in a narrow width of about 30 degrees in the direction of the radar.

I do not expect anything favorable to Russian aircrafts from ED, honestly. Maybe a third party makes something good.

Indeed!

This article is from September 2016, I bet that most of the SU-33 assigned to Syria, already had installed the SVP-24 and tested in the battlefield in about 1000 A2G missions http://www.janes.com/article/63822/russian-carrier-based-su-33-fighters-receiving-new-bombing-computer https://sputniknews.com/military/201702031050311305-admiral-kuznetsov-air-wing-syria/

Terrific, the problem will be to design the functionality of the cockpit, to make work all the MFD like the A-10 or the Ka-50

Yes the real MIG-35 is fully multirole, can launch antiship missiles, laser guided, dumb bombs, TV guided, and at the same time have air to air capability. Have an AESA radar and optical locator system (OLS) and wikipedia says "RAC MiG and the Italian company GEM-Elettronica signed a memorandum of understanding to provide the MIG-35 with a new multifunction self-protection jammer"

Hi sniper, how do you make the Trinus send the head movement to the mouse in the sim?, I have tried in the OpenBeta, but the mouse dissapear in the Headset view, even in the screen is visible. If you move the real mouse the head move in the sim, if you move the VR headset, you see the mouse moving in the screeen, but do not move the sim headlook view! :(