Jump to content

JunMcKill

Members
  • Posts

    1091
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by JunMcKill

  1. If you want to learn about merge and dogfight, do what stuge told you, practice a lot (best online) and ask him any question you have (whispering: he is the master, and I mean it!) :)
  2. Oops you are right!:megalol:
  3. I think Flanker can rename the subject of the original post for SATAC 2016 aircraft poll and make a new one of SATAC 2016 ONLY REGISTRATION
  4. Anyway you can override the launch, and shoot beyond the Rmax distance and will hit
  5. It's not your vote Goose, it's one vote for squad, AFAIK
  6. LOL, come on, the video is from FC2 or earlier, when the vertical mode autolocked the enemies! hahahahahahaah And now watch this F-15 in the CURRENT VERSION! making barrel rolls fully loaded (fuel and ammo) and pulling 14.5G!
  7. EDP 71st Mig29-----yes Su-33-----yes Mirage 2000-----yes
  8. In this case are some guys who likes the SU-33 in several squads, the 33 flight model dont have the S option of the SU-27, at the same time, have less fuel and countermeasures, if the SU--33 goes with ECM have the same missile quantity than F-15, that can have: - 10 missiles - 3 fuel tanks - integrated ECM - Super airframe, never break the wings even with full loadout and stupids 14.5G maneuvers - better SA, radar, and missiles Then, why bother for what the others want to fly?
  9. EDP 71st Vote YES for all aircrafts including SU-33!
  10. Agree!
  11. Yeah, the scripting is better, do it in ME is a pain in the .... :pilotfly:
  12. I think the SU-33 should go, the difference in missiles (two more), is the same in case of fuel with the F-15, that can take three tanks and stay in the air in combat for more time. Unless there is a prohibition to F-15 to carry only one tank!
  13. Flanker, what time will the event?
  14. It means that if someone run out of fuel or winchester, have to RTB out of the bubble?
  15. Be advice, the red side SU-27 #001 have short range missiles in its default loadout
  16. And Mirage?, if you tell me that MIrage EFM is close to reality, please I will hang myself right now! ;) I propose to only fly with SU-27 and F-15C
  17. >Yeah is risky, for the moment you have to recall if you turn in on or not! :)
  18. AWACS?
  19. Thanks stuge, I will insert the code!
  20. Sorry Flanker, I know, that we cant wait for the missiles ok to make a competition, but regarding to tacview, it shows exactly what was saved in the track, remember that all servers have the export option OFF, so we need to replay the track to produce the tacview info. I can upload the video or the R-27ET dissapearing in air if you want, in the track is the same.
  21. Agree, I think that to avoid desync will have to limit client ping to 150 - 200 ms and not more than 30 players. In case of SATAC is more easy, because there are no ground forces, in this scenario all comms are only from aircrafts and missiles.
  22. Squadron Name: EDP 71st Squadron website link: http://dcslatino.forospanish.com/ the squadron 71st can not attend the SATAC event, due lack of staff at the indicated dates and times. Sorry for the inconvenience. Hope the missiles proximity fuze will be repaired before the event, in the past blue flag the shot downs were only scored with direct missile hit, meanwhile I was shot down several times by Matra 530D exploding at 450 meters away! maybe a desync or maybe a bug the problems are still there in the latest version oS2s_59EIAA
  23. The integrity check is not kicking out to the changes made in kneeboard?
  24. Thanks! thats I supposed
  25. I was reading the real SU-27SK manual and found a serie of differences, but the most important was about the SPO-15 threat type warning lights, in the DCS SU-27 and FC3 DCS manuals it appear like below: Threats types: П – airborne radar З - long-range radar X - medium-range radar H - short-range radar F - early warning radar C - AWACS but in the SU-27SK manual, is more complex, and it's not that simple to delimit the air and ground targets: SPO-15LM П – irradiation from SAMs "Terrier" or aircraft type F-4, F-104 with simultaneous inclusion of spike for aiming "Sparrow" missile З – irradiation type SAM "Chaparral", "Vulcan" or naval SAM "Sea Wolf" X – irradiation of SAMs like "Hawk" or aircraft type F-14, F-15, F-16 and F-18 (long-range) Н – irradiation SAM type "Nike Hercules," "Patriot," or naval "Talos"; Г – exposure to short distance of the aircraft F-14, F-15, F-16 and F-18 or missile "Phoenix" in ARH (possibly flashing signals Г together with the X) С – irradiation aircraft type F-4, F-5, F-104, F-111 (without including the illumination channel П), Mirage, Jaguar, nails of SAM type "Terrier", "Crotale" Original: П – облучение ЗРК «Терьер» или самолетами типа F-4, F-104 с одновременным включением подсвета для наведения ракет типа «Спарроу»; З – облучение ЗРК типа «Чапарел», «Вулкан» или ЗРК «Сивульф»; X – облучение ЗРК типа «Хок» или самолетами F-14, F-15, F-16 и F-18 (с больших дальностей); Н – облучение ЗРК типа «Найк-Геркулес», «Патриот», «Талос»; Г – облучение с малых дальностей самолета F-14, F-15, F-16 и F-18 или ракетой «Феникс» с РТС (возможно высвечивание сигнала Г совместно с сигналом X); С – облучение самолетами типа F-4, F-5, F-104, F-111 (без включения канала подсвета), МИРАЖ, ЯГУАР, ЛАЙТНИНГ или ЗРК типа "Терьер", "Кроталь", In this case the FC3 SPO RWR were designed to give a more easy way to deal with it?
×
×
  • Create New...