Jump to content

Basco1

Members
  • Posts

    1091
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Basco1

  1. .......I get the distinct feeling that Razbam aren't even reading our posts correctly,a little more research Decoy would've revealed that the topic I was refering to was the Starboard antenna. @AeriaGloria......re the issue that doesn't need to be resolved immediately....this is just as well,as months go by before anything is corrected here,if at all,but your missing the point. The point is,the issue is this bug/problem/issue,I'm not too fussed what people want to refer to it by,has,or was,put into the 'Resolved Bug' section,when it is quite apparent that it hadn't been resolved at all. I am not chasing the problem to be fixed tomorrow....going on RAZBAM's previous,I know that's not going to happen,but RAZBAM,please don't stick these bugs into the 'Resolved Bugs Section'when they haven't been resolved,that's just plain daft !
  2. You sure ?......I haven't heard anything in five months,have I missed something ? This was one of the bugs that I brought to their notice,soon after release,that was for some reason,put in the 'Resolved Bugs' section......but one has to ask why.....as it has to date,NOT BEEN RESOLVED There were as usual,a plethora of promises from RAZBAM to correct it,but alas,no action taken....pity. Original thread https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=233576
  3. I find it confusing that whilst Razbam had the flight characteristics of the S Model of the MiG-19,or so they have told us,that they chose to model the less famous P Model,which because of it's aerodynamics is quite different. Would'nt it have made sense given this data available,just to have modelled the far more famous S Model,the flight model,obviously would have then been more accurate,saving themselves all sorts of headaches. So,leading on from this,please Razbam,how about giving us the S Model as soon as you can.....makes sense ?
  4. Or the 'S'Model ........
  5. There are not any North Vietnamese skins as the Paintkit hasn't been released yet,quite simply........No Paintkit = No Skins.
  6. @ Rudel_chw.....Nice controls profile Rudel,pity you can't use it for purpose due to the difficulties with the keyinds,but that's a superb profile mate
  7. No..you are completely wrong!...this user has paid a 'lot of money' for this module,it was WIP at the start,and although RAZBAM have corrected a multitude of silly bugs,the module many months later still requires attention.One of these issues being the paintkit. The point in question here,is the 'Paintkit'this was promised as part of the package,when the module was released,they assured the buying masses that this would be made available to them.Many users,on being given this promise made their purchase of the module thinking that this would be the case. If these modules were cheaper,we would all have a better attitude towards it,but they are not,they are expensive,now,if your happy with the current situation then that's your prerogative. But don't come on here and try and belittle other user's attitudes because they show a little more adult sense of financial awareness towards their module purchases,than you do.Trying to show someone up on this forum in the way you have is pretty low IMO,especially when you are the one,making the big point of behaviours towards life.
  8. Completely agree,all the time the module was being sold to us the 'Paintkit' was on it's way.....'should be ready shortly after release',actual words from RAZBAM's Decoy. Now they want to concentrate on other projects,the majority of the sales are done,and the novelty of the thing has worn off,for them,we're now being informed 'please understand that it is a free feature that developers are not forced to deliver'. In a word.....PRICELESS !
  9. Agreed.....My wish list of bugs/annoyances include fixing the starboard antenna,which is not textured or painted in any way,fixing the vital missing air release 'hiss' sound to wheelbrake,and at the top of the list having a paint kit made available. I fully appreciate the MiG-19P was a WIP when I purchased it,but months on,some of these very basic problems ought to have been addressed. As to the MiG-23....I also will not be purchasing it on release,I just haven't been that impressed on the way the MiG-19P has been updated by RAZBAM. It's just all very haphazard and amateurish.
  10. Would like to mention,again.....this missing vital sound to the MiG-19P module is still missing,most MiGs of this Cold War era had this air release sound when the brake lever was released. Without it the module is missing immersion.
  11. Let's face it most DCS jet engine sfx have an uncanny resemblance to a certain ' Briggs And Stratton' sound. Unfortunately the MiG-19P is no different....it's a big pity,as it's DCS achilles heel. Re the MiG-21,Burning Bridge's external sound MOD easily puts the default ones in the shade IMO,1st Class effort Sir.
  12. +1 I really feel duped......I purchased the RAZBAM MiG-19P on the promise/understanding that a paint kit would be made available to us within weeks of the release.This was directly their promise. Had I of known then,that it wasn't going to be so forth coming,if at all,I most certainly would not have been so quick to make my purchase. This paint kit has obviously been shelved for work on other projects....however,I,and I suspect many others,have learned a valuable lesson regarding RAZBAM modules......and their promises.
  13. Thank you DECOY this is very much appreciated
  14. Lol......Thanks Decoy,this is very much appreciated Now....could I direct your Team's attention to the issue of the Starboard Antenna not textured/painted ?.......PLEASE
  15. Thanks DECOY,promises,promises,lol...........or..........you could just hurry the paint kit along,and then we can make our own
  16. The Paint Kit is very important Razbam......we can then set about creating our own Polish skin with the correct Polish Airforce flags. What's the hold up please ?........the new module no doubt.
  17. Excellent news heclak,the A-4E-C is an out of the box masterpiece,it's easily one of the best modules going,and it's FREE. Kudos to you and your team Sir,you have done a sterling effort on this aircraft and you deserve all the credit that's going. First Class
  18. A few weeks ?....We're in June guys
  19. Razbam....I am sorry to raise this issue again,but this bug is still waiting to be resolved.....it is still not fixed,and remains unpainted and untextured,even though you have in your wisdom,decided to move it to your 'resolved' bugs section. This is why so many complain about your modules,as they always appear to remain in a state of being unfinished. My original thread https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=233576 I definitely won't be purchasing your MiG-23,I got my fingers burnt once.....never again
  20. No Decoy this was never fixed,and it's pretty apparent,that nobody from your company has ever studied the Polish Airforce flag in detail,just like many of the other bugs reported,it has just been forgotten about and cast to one side. I even took the trouble to point out the differences in the Polish Airforce flag,uploading pictures to make it very clear to those concerned,but I wasted my time,as nobody from Razbam has taken any notice of it. Like the aerial bug,that was not painted/textured........some of your bugs have been put into that 'resolved' section but are indeed still woefully bugged.......which is a real pity,especially to your customers who had faith in you,that you would indeed resolve these bugs on our behalf
  21. Yes,I can't warm to these 'new'external sounds either,the best external sounds I've witnessed so far were from Burning Bridges,try out his superb sounds here,within the quote. Link: https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3786631&postcount=85
  22. Agreed.....and yet this has been moved to the ' Resolved Bug' section,when,again,just like the 'Red star' bug,it hasn't been resolved. My original post on release day https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=233576 The ' Resolved Bug ' section has become a bit of a joke,whilst I know you guys are doing your best at fixing the multitude of faults/bugs on the MiG-19P,moving these bugs to this section is hazardous,as they are likely to be forgotten. There are quite a few bugs in that section that have been moved there,but have clearly still not been fixed.
  23. Decoy what update will you implementing this please ?,as it's still not fixed, and yet this bug has been moved to the ' Resolved Bugs' section.
  24. Months of no updates,no explanation from the devs.....just like the Yak-52,it's abandoned,ED may tell you otherwise,but the proof is pretty evident,and we're not fools. It's a pity,but this is becoming more and more frequent sadly with some DCS modules,it does make you wonder what you're buying into,especially after the debacle with the Hawk.
×
×
  • Create New...