Jump to content

upyr1

Members
  • Posts

    4342
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Everything posted by upyr1

  1. In the past there was talk about an IED module that would include improved ECM and including adding ECM aircraft.
  2. It's hard to say what I want the most. I love the Grach. The fitter I believe is planed the MiG-27 should have been bundled with the 23. The 38 is barely flyable but should come with a Kiev class carrier and we need more naval assets.
  3. I hope we get the module soon I would love to fly sead
  4. I know, however I brought it up as Octopus G is working on the Fitter and the main reason people want to bring back these weapons is to give Red For players precision strike and SEAD from a fast fighter. I expect the numbers will be even lower with the right fitter.
  5. A simple "I don't know could have worked" anyhow as neither of us know what they are working on, could you at least comment on the latest version used by Russia vs the latest version used by other former WP pact members? As I have said before, this really looks like an argument for better MOD support ED doesn't have enough information to do the SM models would would have guided A2G weapons however there is a large minority of people interested in them
  6. It is good to see that it isn't going to be too hard to accurately use the E as a stand-in for the A and B bombing downtown Hanoi
  7. I would love it if ED and other developers would focus on assets that can do double duty for WWII and Korea
  8. upyr1

    ships

    Cleveland Class- make sue it has the square bridge. I want the OKC to look right.
  9. upyr1

    F6F Hellcat

    Awesome
  10. upyr1

    Vmf-214 liveries

    We might not have the right variant but that's still no reason not to have the Black Sheep How about we get both ASAP? The module needs to have some liveries when it comes out
  11. what would the 1987 fitting have been like?
  12. I wish we had an official mod repository
  13. upyr1

    model kits

    I think you need glue and paint I've got got a 1990s battleship battlegroup in the works and a Kirov
  14. How about the Su-22 variant which I believe Octopus G is working on?
  15. So 3/4 people don't want the weapons. That's a super majority. My question is which of these weapons might we see on a Fitter.
  16. So 3/4 people don't want the weapons. That's a super majority. My question is which of these weapons might we see on a Fitter.
  17. I wonder if the problem was Boeing
  18. If they offered it to ED then that should be the free trainer.
  19. This is one of the many places where ground AI needs to be improved. I figure if the troops are in a position to jump out they should do so and start shooting if possible (though the fire should be random). Also on a related topic of improving AI
  20. I don't believe there are such plans either. Given the choice I would rather see new modules over a variant module (there are some exceptions).
  21. Unless VNAO offering ED the T-45 if they include it free, then I think the best path for a free trainer would be for ED to either upgrade the user files to a mod repository and introduce a mod manager possibly using an existing solution (cough)Nexus(cough).
  22. Thanks, for posting. Not planned- does anyone think we could get Bulgarian manuals?
  23. I think Eagle should just hire a naval and ground team give them a list of modules to work on and have them make any necessary changes to DCS core. As you know I think the first ship modules should be the Iowa-class battleships. They served off and on throughout World War II and the cold war. I figure a destroyer or cruiser module should be next
  24. Let ED decide whether or not they can afford to do that or not. I think we have at least one free community module which I think makes a great trainer that being the A-4.
×
×
  • Create New...