upyr1

The DCS naval environment is lacking quite a bit. The real question is what will provide us the most coverage

Yes please

Working LCACs and the ability to spawn units from the gator fleet. Also the 1980s refit of the Iowa-class battleships for fire support. Whidbey Island-class dock landing ships Also an lph livery for the Essex class carrier.

Confused look in F-4M Phantom FGR.2 I thought the RAF and FAA got their respective Phantoms at the same time.

I was flying as a RIO for the first time, it's hard to see the tacan when the lantern is installed, can we have a button to hide the stick?

You are not the only one, ideally I'd love to have a mission editor that connects to the file section and enables you to do online collaboration.

I know you are focused on Cold War aircraft, but it is important to remember that the DCS timeline covers almost 90 years and includes both air, land, and naval assets. We need enough variants that using historical mode there is no gap.

While I am not a pit builder, I have to agree this would be a nice option to add. Since the way things are right now you'll need 2 switches for a covered switch. 1 for the cover and 1 for the switch. If you have the cover on your physical cockpit then why make 2 steps in DCS?

The OP is trying to reduce the number of electronic components and possibly is using the cover on a physical switch

It looks like we're getting more ships acording to the 2024 trailer, anyone have ideas on what all is lined up?

The Corsair we're getting might not be the right version for Korea but neither is the MiG-15. I'd still love some Korean War missions.

I hope we get a Zeke module

It looks like we're getting some ships

Cool, the Enterprise He did some great work, but I'll be happen to see the official assets

It's awesome we're getting them

I believe this is the most important statement in the whole thread. I'd like to know what pilots are saying this and the reason. Are USAF pilots saying this or is everyone saying this?

I'd love to have a training campaign using an AI instructor You would start with some airmanship missions, start-up, taxing, take-off, and navigation missions. followed by weapons training, possibly aerobatics, and combat missions. The AI instructor will give you hints if requested. You would get graded based on how closely you perform the syllabus the only sure way to fail a mission is to die.

I hope they will at least fix the VR and other bugs or start on the vehicle modules

If we do have enough information, would you be interested in the G?

The main problem I see with the request is the idea of making it part of combined Arms, as ED says that is complete.

True we never had it, which is why it needs to be built.

Didn't Razbam talk abut a cold war asset pack?

I'd also love to see ED work on Forward observer functionality as well. Right now DCS artillery is flat-out horrible.

I'd also include the option of listing both

That is the reason the JTAC needs to change their laser codes. That is what they do in real life