*Rage*

No. They're complaining about a legitimate bug that is having an adverse effect on multiplayer. Some of the personal comments directed at you were uncalled for, however. At the end of that round 1, even the game engine considered the plane destroyed. And yet it still has the integrity to do a sight seeing tour and turn at 90deg bank angles. Why are you defending the indefensible?:)

"Thank you, thats perfect":megalol:

This is all wrong. FC3 is just a name. There is no hardcoded limitation to what can be done. Its just a name given for a particular level of systems modelling and initially, flight model. That definition has changed over the years with extra radar modes (PRF) and PFM added etc. Common sense dictates that just as FC2 was different than FC1, and FC3 was different than FC2 then so will FC4 be different to FC3. What makes a module an "FC" module may or may not change depending on what ED decide to do with it. Theres a difference between design choice and design limitation. ^ This.

Tacviews: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1FW7FwfJ7DCEigJ5BLgEiU2riloL-A7l1?usp=sharing Next match Lockon Greece vs Chinese Festival.

Great match. Fantastic comeback in the first round from the 36th, particularly =36th=Evil!

I thought they didnt need to since the wing pylons were less likely to FOD the engine intakes with smoke. Anyway, learnt something new today..

Really? its different for the ER and 77?

Bug: R77 launched from the inner wing stations (pylon 3 and 8 ) eject off the launcher before the rocket ignites. As I understand it it should fire while still on the launcher as the ER/ET do from pylons 3 and 8. Thanks.

Nice!

I doubt the J11 would surpass the popularity of the M2K.

Perhaps there should be a separate J11A subforum. There are some issues being reported with engine sounds and the like in different sections.

Thank you for your insights comrade, but in case you missed it the first time: :thumbup:

Could all teams let me know (if you havent already on the SATAL discord) if you used a GCI in your matches and how many rounds they participated in. They are unsung heros and are due recognition in the pilot rankings:) S!

The F15 is most affected by this bug. Nothing the BS team can do about it though.

Congrats:) If it boosts that well do you still even need to OC?

Great fight 104th and thanks to Microvax and Lazzyseal for hosting! Tacviews uploaded https://drive.google.com/drive/folde...l1?usp=sharing Next match 36 Stormo Virtuale vs inSky!

:thumbup:

Tacviews are always uploaded to the same, open access, Google drive: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1FW7FwfJ7DCEigJ5BLgEiU2riloL-A7l1?usp=sharing The last match, SF vs ITGC, was uploaded last Saturday evening.

^ You contradict yourself. Anyone, in any plane, given the right circumstances can shoot 'noobs' down in a MP server. Infact you dont even need to shoot them down. They'll often kill themselves. Once you equalise the playing field and engagement circumstances the equipment becomes much more important. You might be the best Mig15 pilot out there. But go head to head with a even a slightly less capable Mig21 or AV8B pilot and youll eat an R60m/Aim9M to the face every time before you even get to the merge. Theres no doubt pilot skill is extremely important. But this "pilot skill means I can negate all technological disadvantages" fallacy is born of opportunistic flying in clusterf**k server setups. Really fun and I enjoy it too, but dont read too much into it.

Id love to see a J10 in DCS.

Great work DArt!

Thanks to SF and ITGC for an exciting match! This Saturday: 51st vs 104th

Chizh mentioned on the russian side that he didnt believe there was a viable market for russian aircraft. Aside from the probable classification issues. Edit: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=103691&page=20 Page 20 and onwards. Use chrome translator.

R-77-1 is not the RVV-AE.

I didnt expect TWS or a time till active/impact timer but no DLZ?