*Rage*

We tried it. MPRF works ever so slightly better.

We switch to MED PRF by default within 20km. Tracking is still terrible...

The Hornet is at least a year away (in my estimatiion). Probably far longer till full release. I also doubt ED would let HB do their missile work for them. So far 3rd party modules have made their own missiles. An interim fix is needed. This issue wont go away otherwise.

And delete the Ka-50 while youre at it:lol: Seriously though never heard of an AM variant before! Sounds interesting, in at least an 'alternate fact' aggressor kind of way.

....in a look up situation. Thats what the mod changed IRC. Notching while at lower altitude/ground clutter still worked.

To be honest im not sure since I haven't tried it in a while. Try and see...Perhaps Ragnarok will drop by and update it.

Sorry Swan, that might have been a little harsh from me but we've had these discussions before and there are a cohort of posters who will deliberately try and derail the thread into farce with memes, trolling etc. We've waited years for the dedicated server code, the great merge, all sorts of other things promised by ED. Its only another 30 years or so before I retire (and really get time to DCS) and im sceptical the entire missile recoding will be done by then:) A interim fix will go a long way to sorting the issue.

Ragnarok made a pretty good mod by tweaking the values. Of course as always happens the F15 pilots (the usual suspects) are foaming at the mouth trying to prevent any meaningful improvement in the abysmal SARH tracking. Edit: Ragnarok mod here https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=2553838&postcount=7

Im useless with the ME stuff. So you're saying its either no ERs or full ER? Is there not a possibility to limit the pylon loadouts individually (ie block the other non-ER MRM pylons for the Su27)?

Any idea at all? Please give us something man!

None of the popular MP servers cater for NTTR/Normandy. If the 104th, BF, Open conflict, ACG etc ported their missions and server to 2.1 then you would see far more traffic. As it stands however, its far too much work to do that. So really its only 'single' player servers currently up. Edit: the 104th have run events in the NTTR map which went down well.

+1 for Flanker datalink! Or.. How about restricting Flankers to only 2 ERs?

I think it doubtful that it could guide all the way to a hit but it could keep the missile heading in the general 'ballpark' of the target till such a time that radar lock is re-established. From a design point of view this would be tactically sound since as you are continously closing in on this notching target staying in the notch becomes more difficult or its likely the target will drop oput of the notch and run/re-engage.

Its a waste to use missiles on AI. Even in BF....

Thanks!

There was a brief period when one of EDs patches (dont recall when, maybe a year ago) rendered all CMs ineffective. The complaints from Eagle drivers was epic:lol: Just goes to show how everyone has got used to lazy missile evasion.

+1 We need the guides back!

Once you 4K on a big screen theres no going back. Anything less just looks cartoonish:)

Sadly I dont think we are getting meteors with the VEAO Typhoon. Its buried in one of their threads in the subforum. Likewise im not so sure re: Iris-t and asraam.

1080 is too low a resolution to stretch a 1070. My FPS will drop 30-40% going from 1440 to 4k.

Subscribed! Shame there isnt a european contact such as yourself.

Fair fight without constricting everyone to the same airframe. Not wishlist. But its easier to simply limit payloads. Hence Blueflag, RedFlag, 104th missions etc..

You know, despite what I said earlier, the more I think about it the more it appeals to me:) Perhaps the 104th Can add it to a mission and see what happens. Does it have to be both server and client side?

The manual is wrong. Its full of mistakes.

ER vs Aim7m vs 530D is where the partys at. In the absence of an upgraded Flanker (SM+) then addition of R77s, from a balance point of view, might work. Except its unrealistic and would involve modding the sim, which im loathe to do. For a 'fair fight' - aside from using the same airframes on both sides (boring) then a restricted loadout works best. Just to recap, service dates- Aim7M - 82 R - 83 ER - 86 530D - 87 120C - 96