Jump to content

ST0RM

Members
  • Posts

    1195
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by ST0RM

  1. Disappointed because you're choosing to stick with Stable/2.5? They've been saying since the announcement for 2.7 they'd wait to release it under that version. Such entitled behavior for something given to us for free.
  2. While it doesn't make me happy, I am glad others are seeing it. Too bad it appears to be a very random bug.
  3. Yeah, I was a -135 boom. Flew many MPRS missions
  4. More than likely, the aircraft will go to the 6th SOS. They are listed as a "Combat Aviation Advisory" unit and provide training to allied nations on tactics, etc... Like the Jungle Jim of Vietnam, with A-26 and T-28s. So the need for an actual armed aircraft probably isnt there.
  5. When I lived in Germany, our house was under a MOA. On occasion, I'd see GAF Tornados ripping over at low level, enroute to the Polygon EW range. One day, I was outside and watched a pair of Spang F-16s, doing several 1-2 circle setups. They were literally over my house. Very cool memory. Great videos!
  6. https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/39976/special-operations-commands-new-a-29-super-tucano-pays-tribute-to-world-war-ii-air-commandos
  7. Yes, there I'd make a concession. Fri gave some examples of how auto AAR could work. On the flipside, how would it be implemented on servers? A special server with less restrictions? To each their own. Back to my thing.
  8. Look dude, this is a game, not a requirement in life. When I cant do something, I WORK at it until I can. I dont ask for special conditions or whatever. You've been given some solutions, but you dont accept them in the name of "realism". Instead you've just badgered people. Whatever.
  9. Well, I'm off to AAR. Why? Because I can.
  10. What's funny, in the time that has been spent in this stupid thread, the ones who cant AAR, could have practiced and learned it already.
  11. RIP BuNo 167100
  12. I've looked at the only log I had, but it doesnt even show the lock-up, nor any issues that lead up to it. It just stopped. No mods, just liveries. Load was 4xGBU-12 and 4xGBU-38s on the BRU-55, 1xAux tank and TGP
  13. No crash log was generated because the game simply froze up. But tonight in M/P, I was selecting QTY of 2 from two racks and as soon as I di so, the game locked up and I had to Ctrl/Alt/Del to close it.
  14. Do they still shoot? I'd like to see the rocket pods mounted without the front gun mounts, but still have door gunners.
  15. Not for the F-16 in the orange and white scheme. I did search
  16. I regularly experience it on the Syria map, no matter the aircraft. If I look at F10, frames drop by 2/3 and it stutters for 2 minutes. I've looked at my RAM usage and its at 95%+ until it settles down. Thats with 32Gbs and a 2080ti. It's been made aware to ED/Ugra, but no resolution. I guess they have 64Gbs on their systems so it's not a priority.
  17. Great photo Scot. As always...
  18. Tried the mod out. Pretty nice for such an early project. The model reminds me of the FSX Tim "Piglet" Conrad version. It'll be nice to have it available after waiting on RB's excuses over the last 5 years.
  19. 3 month bump, again
  20. From their Discord, they'll wait for 2.7 to release and then check to see if its still working then release.
  21. Read through the whole thread. But you need a script to make the troops and dropped equipment become persistent.
  22. Looking forward to this. Spent a bunch of time down at Meridian and would photograph the 'hawks that stopped in for gas.
  23. The way its modelled is incorrect though. The right/starboard side is the preferred starting point, not the left. And the tanker's hoses should be deployed upon notification that the intent to refuel is given. Its a visual signal to the receiver that the tanker is ready. If only 1 hose is out, the tanker is unable to use both, etc...
  24. See this pic. https://www.airliners.net/photo/USA-Navy/McDonnell-Douglas-T-45C-Goshawk/2745195/L
×
×
  • Create New...