pepin1234

Infantry are deadly. Of course we don’t expect a full simulated Infantry but at least decent distance and prone position could be implemented in the near future.

I am talking about accuracy. You can shoot also a missiles from whatever distance you want if you know how to. I was thinking you guys wanted to talk about simulation. 500m is absolutely a distance you will not try if you have 3 rockets. But from the computers kids enjoy see such ridiculous entertainment s.

300m is ok for a RPG. 500m is too much. Also there is a visual detection by default that allow detect the infantry from every angle of a vehicle. I would ask for a max shot from 300m and a detection only from front angle and limited or none detection from rear. They need improve the infantry. Syria map in current operation is mainly an infantry operation. This infantry AI need attention.

Because UB hace same Avionic and two pilots to close to Su-30. At least something

They don’t need to bring a Su-30. Making a Su-27UB FC3 level could be very nice. At least you hold the less load work. But... nothing.

yes you right and we are aware of that. that is exactly what we want that happen the same to Mig-29. intead we are getting a bounce (20m not kidding) that make you loose the control and many times we die. yes I can land the Mig-21 without issues. That's why we are asking for a change for Mig-29. Because this landing difficulty have been implemented only for Mig-29 or Su-33 making annoying deaths their pilots.

it is not a bug. You are doing wrong. You are setting a shorter minimum distance. you cant set 500m to a artillery unit as Uragan. See track work perfect CA artilery normandy no-bug.trk

maybe that happen because they don't like modern warfare simulation on this maps

we don't have Su-30 as playable unit. The bad Russian Bear will come at night while they are sleeping (as you mentioned) if they make a Su-30. ...they dont care

Black Shark 3 is taking long. wow...! maybe come together with Mi-24 in a offer package.

video please

good job. thanks

Interesting stuff that SVP-24 info. As always Wags will tell Russian government don’t allow simulate ANY military system.... FC3 level implementation could be easily the right direction for that system already used in Syria.

This: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=280937

Stressed landings are a lot often in an amateur simulator. So keep on topic with the behavior we want point on the topic. While you want to change the point of the thread to a landing school WE the pilots that flies often in MiG-29 are on topic with that particular bounce and jump making deaths to players. Respect the MiG-29 pilots in the forum please. Don’t treat us like fools...

Apply the same difficulty skill level for F-18 and F-16 then. The thread is not to learn landing, it is instead for particular behave making MiG-29 flies up uncontrollable and in many cases finish with a death for that player. The landing school you want to dictate us when landing in MiG-29 is like: Landing out of parameters in Mig-29 deserve a bounce and a possible death. While Landing out of parameters in F-18 or F-16 deserve a landing gear broken. The thread name is for the hyper bounce after an out of parameters landing attempt. All the examples and attempts to teach the players to get into parameters to avoid a fatal landing are off topics.

The F-1 is died right or will come all inclusive with GPS:D

A good next step could be a Su-27UB FC3 level. I will pay for it ~$30 for sure https://images.app.goo.gl/yJtb4XH2KBRd65LX8

Welcome. Sound to me they will be on charge for the 3D integration of NS-430 in the rest of modules? Or that was a first step only to continue with...? What is the main project?

Thanks Smith. You made one hour video wow. Well... is obvious... this is epic and funny Olympic gold medal in high jump for MiG-29, Silver for Su-33. F-16 and F-18 disqualified, too much programmed code to not jump well as high MiG-29 do. F-18 working hard (identity the girl is asking if F-18 is ok after the fail...:megalol:) :

Again. We are discussing here something to solve this specific action from developers in the game. In Real Life ECM will leave guided missiles in very bad situation. That’s why they don’t want to apply a close real ECM to keep the game in favor F fighters. Otherwise R-27ET will have better success than now have with this ridiculous ECM implementation. So you should work on all together using to the max the few options they leave to Su-27 or any Ru.

To improve our success to face this bias developing actions I suggest have ECM ON until 50km range and keep a aggressive maneuver leaving enemy to a side in our HUD. Never flies straight head on when you see they reach +8000m. They are reaching this high altitude to make this launch on pitbull in case you have ECM on or using the way of the video mention before. But... having ECM on as you know is tricky for the RU fighters. They still can launch on HOJ ECM so as we all know the developers set a unrealistic Long time delaying the ECM to be activated so of course that will be also against us. The best way to solve this tricky issue: just off-back ON the ECM while aggressive maneuvering. That will avoid a possible HOJ launch and also will brake the lock on you. Please if possible do all together launching some chaff

We can keep discussion a whole week while you continue answer things we never mention on this thread. We are not that stupid to ask for something as touchdown with front landing gear first. One more time... please focus on the regular landing when we touchdown a bit speedy and after touchdown with rear landing gear then the front landing gear make us jump and in some cases we got killed. Can you answer this exactly please. Why happen that only to MiG-29?