pepin1234

Depend if the Mi-24 has autopilot and if you can activate it from the front seat.

I don’t care much about AI multicrew like F-14. Just player multicrew like L-39 one could work for me. Anyway I will move front cockpit to search targets and pull the trigger for ATGM

What do you think about the radio voice of the video? It is the copilot?

The videos in YouTube are awesome. I am curious if laser guided bombs will be implemented.

Well what you mentioned above is too much maybe. I don’t want mention the name of the other simulator to avoid they delete my post. Just to give you track. It is a tank hard core simulator. They have also a kind of retarded infantry but when you are controlling the infantry you can do a lot, like different positions on the ground that allow hide a bit the group of infantry and make a big difference. Not crazy good but useful. What we got now in DCS is like droop potatoes on the battlefield

They couldn’t wait to put BS3 on the last of the list to move forward and prioritize A-10 V2 with also New forum opened: https://forums.eagle.ru/forumdisplay.php?f=765 Tell me what...

Black Shark 2 have not even Forum and they were even faster to make a Forum for A-10C V2.

for transport Helicopters module?? yes should be on the top of the list. The only thing have been made for Transport helicopters is the sling load. They implemented also the simulated internal load. Bud when we talk about the main task for this air transport, that is infantry transportation, then we have a problem. If some of you are experience mission maker you will notice the DCS mission are plenty of armor vehicles. So that mean drop a squad of regular soldiers in the current DCS is useless. For several reasons. The only way to fix this issue is drooping a squad with many RPG soldiers to face the huge amount of vehicles in our missions.

I think is the contrary. Datalink is for VVS. While PVO depends on GCI. We strongly need a Razbam member team to clarify this. MiG-23 is not designed to keep radar search in battlefield (the same for MiG-29 but ED owners give nothing about) so how they plan we gonna be working for enemy contact. Asking AWACS like a FC3 aircraft...?

Yes that true. GCI have been ignored by developers. Not only MiG-23 need it, also MiG-29S was made to be guided with GCI. The only fighters in Soviet Union were really capable to operate independent was Su-27 and MiG-31 when they are in patrol. So probably we will get a VVS MiG-23 and that’s why they don’t care much bout GCI.

Our MiG-19 is a PVO or VVS?

The GCI will direct the MiG to a fixed point and an altitude of interception been this altitude below the enemy target. When GCI operator see you get into about 10km range, also 15km work. So at this point GCI operator tell you the Radar elevation To set. 2 or 3 will be 2000m or 3000m up for radar elevation for detection. After this point the Pilot confirm the detection and lock and the Pilot do the rest.

Min 2:20 the pilot show the S-8 KOM.

run several times these two missions below. one with KOM and the other OFP. I did several times and OFP is slightly better. edit: OFP is the first upgraded serie of the S-8 rockets. Probably better performance in range, but the nature of been unguided make this missile the same in effective range. Russian made from this upgrade serie, the laser guided rockets. Different construction. Su-25 S-8OFP effectiveness.miz Su-25 S-8KOM effectiveness.miz

I was testing the Chinese submarine and they only use cruiser missiles for now. I never have seen a torpedo in DCS.

Dude This thread is not about MFD. keep looking in the forum for the right place for your question because your question is not even about Su-27 video or R-27ER... the pictures you see below are from a Tacview flight record.

Here is another example of what we (the R-27ER users) are talking about. They told us that Russian government doesn't allow simulate four generation fighters. Then look on this physics implementation for the "not allowed'' fighters. I will copy paste this post in my first post here to people have a better picture what we are talking about... First missiles action started at 50km distance. Not because my system allowed me to do it. I just did an Launch Override just to keep him busy. Otherwise the physics implemented in this simulator for R-27ER will not allow launch from 50km. Notice that this missile is currently combat active in last RU fighters like Su-35. Also notice that doesn't matter I have ECM ON and I am on terrain mask. that not apply for simulation so thats why he is willing to start combat at 50km because inside 50km the ECM are trash in this simulator. Just go ahead and look what they do instead with Aim-120: Here in this picture you can see the Aim-120 on the top of the picture. Please notice I did already two aggressive maneuvers for nothing, just look the quiet and easy job trajectory the simulate for interception. at the other side look my missile biting the ground. not only that... look the deep dive the F-18 performs loosing guidance for his missile that keep fallow me. Seem all are easy coded here. different view of above: Here we get into ~30km distance and you can see my 3 missiles still dont reach the half of the distance and the Aim-120 is already on me with about 1,5mach: At this point he is about 5500m altitude and me about 2500m after a lot of maneuvers. Please notice the amount of maneuvers in smoked red and the exaggerated curved trajectory of my missiles. Look the blue trajectory of the Aim-120 that not even bothered to look for an interception point compared to the exaggerated R-27ER trajectory: This is the second Aim-120 launch momentum. Please look that F-18 not even turn on me to get a right initial guidance with 63 degrees respect me from 27km and was strong enough to kill me. I just outperformed that cheat with high maneuvers while take a look on my missiles... they go 10km ahead in interception... After 3 missiles spent on me and all three evaded, we finally found each other in 12km distance both alive. Please look the 90 degrees direction at this launch momentum of me respect the F-18 with very low altitude and using the mountains as mask. At this point he was still high with some contrail. After I tried my IRST EOS at this moment and failed to get his heat even when the sky was clear. I tried a quick change with vertical scan to launch my R-77 and was too late. anyway this last try with poor hopes because the R-77 is also a trash from this distance if the enemy maneuvers.:doh:

It is very important the distance they shoot. More distance is less accurate to hit the units and then the RPG become a waste of resources in a mission making Mission makers poor interest in RPG. As you should know the vehicle usability in our missions is too high, This is because the lack of infantry AI implementation. So taking account we have poor infantry implementation because the nature of the fight Sim. Then that situation make mission makers use more quantity of vehicles in missions. As we already have the air transport to deploy infantry. A logic deploy against vehicles will be RPG. Making RPG more efficient and usable in missions is giving a big plus to transport helicopters. Yes Mi-8 and Huey need desperately a Good reason to exist in a mission. Nothing better than infantry transportation and if this deployment is against vehicles and well Made that will be even better. While they leave RPG so retarded shooting from 500m and wasting ammo as crazy while they stay stand forever then what is the sense to deploy an anti-vehicle force in an Helicopter...??? What a comedian guy :D

Can I use a specific vehicle unit to deploy landmines? Probably we don’t have this option by default, just wonder if we can create a mobile unit to deploy landmines everywhere using the F10 special menu.

My friend Tacview can be used with whatever goal you have in your mind. The most important is the deep analysis in a combat or flight. Install Tacview, run the track, open the Tacview generated after replay the track, see every detail you need analyze.

Can you make the video with a Tacview file? Otherwise we can also think a second missile hit you. We don’t have way to know that with your video

Please try looking this in the track. You are in between Tracking radar and enemy fighters. In this case you have been painted by the tracking radar. If you are on the air. You have you ECM on.

If you use a thermobaric round yes. It is a round you gonna see more in regular armed forces ex URSS allies. And that depend a lot of the target terrain configuration. If target is beside a solid building or vehicle, RPG will kill closest infantry. RPG users will not think twice in use a HEAT round against a building with soldiers as targets. In this case 500m distance is a reasonable distance for a side stand soldier. Not for a snipping 500m vehicle if you really wanna use your ammo well.

It is realistic if they use it to fight soft targets like groups of infantry. To hit a vehicle at 500m is too high expectation to get a solid hit with such unguided rockets in a horizontal trajectory. At least if we talk about real combat and not range fun day with tons of ammo, 500m for a vehicle could be hard.