pepin1234

This aircraft have a lot of high tech. Very welcome in DCS. Excellent video.

Good news. Can’t wait for that

Question? In case I am doing buddy lasing for Kh-25ML. It is possible enemy spot my laser from a ground unit with NVG using CA module?

Specially the Angola map. This area was plenty of military actions at 80s.

That mean 80% of your interception flight is low altitude and 20-25% climb to the target with only this climb moment radar on The person do different than that, don’t know how use Mig-21

You always should have the option for long range missiles to secure you stay alive at distance. The weapons amount limitation in game logistics is a feature that very few people use. Even more in multiplayer the leak of Kh-29 missile to destroy fortifications in a single departure can lead in unbalance result. Actually the red side don’t use so often Russian aircrafts because there are many negative situation with weapons and systems doesn’t work. This example About Kh-29 not destroying fortifications could be one of those situation that lead in unbalanced results. Also I guess @slidem is asking to try have fun with such weapons. How come he gonna think in real life situation dumb bombs are better... come on... If Kh-29 missile have the feature to destroy fortifications in real life. Why this missiles is in such downgrade situation?

Single Kh-29 must work for a ammo depo. If someone need to go rearm because two Kh-29 was not enough for the same number of fortifications as Shelters and Ammo depo or command post. Then this gonna be an issue for developers coding for this weapon. A single Kh-29 missile can easily destroy this kind of fortifications. Doing the same task with Kab 500Kr is put your aircraft in risk. You don’t need that when you have weapons with range enough to keep your life safe, as Kh-29L/T is IRL.

I never did change this laser code selector. So is no way to edit them? Should be mission editor option for that. I hope they do something in this regards. This simulator is getting boring with this red side full of limitations everywhere.

They just show this video. Never said is their own product

I use ARC when I am close to the hot area (look for the closest station in that area) and if I want more accurate position in low altitude where RSBN do not reach, then I ask to AWACS direction to Home Plate and then you will get your position respect your base. About inverted in interception and radar. I guess you are intercepting in a climb, also I guess you use your radar only in this climb because your radar is for the last moment of the interception. At day time I use radar if it is too cloudy and when I carry R-3R. The use of the radar in day time is not always needed. Radar is for bad weather condition and night time. In dogfight only use R-60 missile.

I am not sure if Su-25 have a fixed laser code, I guess should have it. If yes Ka-50 could do amazing job lasing for Su-25.

Off and ON pop up.

ED fixed the bug with Mig-21 afterburner and this GPS module?? Was a bug very annoying turning off the GPS when afterburner. Guess what, only in Mig-21.

Interception only at night time. You hit and run to the base. No dogfight. When you get radar contact to the right or left do small corrections and take care to keep your last heading after the correction. If contact still not show in scope, do an inverted and scan slight down.

They have Mig-23 module on hold until finish the rest?

Will be very interesting some Chinese helicopters.

HQ7 LN missile are not radar guided missiles. The radar on board LN unit is only for range verification in a short lapse of time. So as told you before. Your RWR already have many unrealistic behavior. There is no reason to show HQ7 radar paint for long time in western RWR. Because is not real, and because you should not detect so easy this LN unit. That’s why they separate SR radar from LN.

If you want every single detail playing in your favor because theory tell this and that, then you are requesting a custom simulator based on theories rather than real factors. There are many factors that play against what western RWR show right now in our simulators. That’s why HQ7 LN should not be implemented with Radar emissions, because the SAMs operator behavior is not even 30% implemented as IRL. This will bring a high difficulty for SEAD missions. You only request things that make easier every move in your favor but never have been simulated a single detail that simulate advanced SAMs simulation. Including many factors that have to do with western RWR. So in my opinion HQ7 LN should not be shown in your RWR taking account that will be simplified in your favor as always. Main developers should improve the SAMs implementation instead that make it all look as simple as IRL is not. Not when SAMs commander is playing his roll.

Single Kh-29 should work. In case a single Kh-29 is not enough. Open a ticket to ask why they downgrade this missile to destroy fortifications as shelters and ammo depo. This is not a bug, they change this value for some reason.

Then if depende of the antenna design. I guess you assume all antenna design should be modeled the same...? So how come you tell me I am not correct? That’s why I am telling you rather than ask for features (as you do in this thread asking for radar paint from LN HQ7) that improve even more the current unrealistic situation awareness for western RWR in DCS. Then let’s talk about some issues are not addressed by main developers in the very important realistic feature that go against Russian SAMs, as the tracking radar signal all spread in a big area instead of been a narrow cone in lock mode or search mode. I am talking about real practice result. Leave theories for sales, rather than simulation.

If main developer implemented this short time radar paint. Must be a very short paint as IRL behave the SAM operator. Also I am talking about the exaggerated wide angle signal that ED set for some tracking radar. Tracking radars signals are narrow and in lock mode even more narrow. How come the western RWR detect a tracking signal that point 40 degrees different than my bearing position. This is unrealistic and this simulation play against Russian tracking radar been easily detected and destroyed. That’s why I am telling you if you want simulate this tiny short time paint time, then they should go ahead and do a well done homework with Russian SAMs. As for example the wrong wide angle for tracking signal.

This LN radar is used for few seconds to verify target range only. It is not worth it simulate this short painted time. There are more important issues to fix, like the unrealistic wider emissions for some Russians tracking radar. That only help western RWR to increase situation awareness to destroy easily Russian SAMs. Yesterday I did a test and I was painted by a tracking radar 40 degrees left to the pointed target. Kind of help for western aircraft.

Some mobile RSBN will be really useful to set them closer to the target. By the way, did you see the new TACAN unit in M Editor. That could be an open way to a mobile RSBN. Who is developing this new TACAN unit?

AI have all skins too. Did you try change skins to AI?

Go and convince VVS that they should not use those missiles because you are too fan of everything is not Russian. Also try and convince the rest of the west you GGtharos have proof they never will be hit by R-27. Maybe you are not so lucky in this task. If you show what do Aim-54 in DCS they will laugh in your face.