Davis0079

each farp is for one flight only at a time....so if you only put one helo in the flight, it still takes up the whole farp ...add a second and/or a third for each additional flight you wish to be able to take off at one tine ...so to recap....just because you only have a one ship flight...you still take up all four heli pads just the same as if you were a four ship... thats why you have to wait for them to take off and leave before spawning in later then you wished edit....i could be very wrong about this...but I have yet to make two different flights take off at the same time from a farp......

i have this problem too.....I delete my saved game folder (except for my input folder inside the saved game/dcsworld/ )......then launch single player and run a quick mission to get ingame....then exit that...start multiplayer from the single player gui menu......if it doesnt work the first time, quickly exit and re launch multi player again..... I dont know why this works or what the problem is...but I also rebuild my monitor lua file to try and fix the gui placement with no luck......I think this install has been updated since before 1.22..........mabey its time for me to try a clean install to get rid of any problem crap

not as amazing as a block50/52 C version would be in DCS I'm a firm believer that a DCS:Viper would be the highest selling addon ever made for DCS......but, i guess I'll just have to do cat launches when the hornet comes out in the spring of 2065 P.S. I'd rather have the "Bird Of Prey" then the Millennium Falcon

how often do you guys use the laser reset...or turn your laser off.......try installing the mod that puts the laser temp on the hud and monitor it carefully........I never have crazy shkval problems anymore.......I'm pretty sure it is a malfunctioning laser that is messing with you guys and not the camera dont wait for the timer to count down to 0 and the laser to turn off automatically.....use the laser reset immediately after your missile hits...not only will you keep your laser cooler and in better working order...but you will be able to fire more missiles one after another with less time wasted between each shot I think this is a laser temp/faulty laser problem.....not a crazy shkval problem like previously stated....I stopped having this problem after learning to manage the laser a little better.

i could be very wrong about this....but the "landing light" as you call it on the Ka-50 is a slewable spotlight.....and when you turn it off, it does retract plz forgive me if this isnot what you are talking about

install BS1...then...install DCS:world....then...install BS2 upgrade....Launch DCS:world to play BS1 and BS 2 are the same game (different game engines)......BS2 is BS1 made to play with World BS2upgrade is for ppl that original owned BS1 from 2007 and wished to upgrade to BS2 at a discounted price to play DCS:world and fly online with the other modules

Damn your fast posting skills Power5.....I should have never stopped to wiki the facts.....o well....

comanche was never produced nor ever in combat (i could be wrong on this)...I think you have a better chance for ED to make a clickable cockpit for the space shuttle Discovery then a airframe that was never more then just a prototype (if even that)......once again, I have very little info on the Comanche, so those last two statments could very well be wrong on the subject of a modern (non comanche) chopper....you and everyone else that has ever posted on these forums have wished and asked for it....the hope is that we will get an american attack chopper to go with the huey (perfect opponents for the ka-50 and Mi-8 ) ...I personally dont need a longbow apache to shoot down the Ka-50...a cobra or early apache is an equivalent to the Ka-50 IMO...the AH-64D would just be overkill in my hands from wiki The Boeing-Sikorsky RAH-66 Comanche was an advanced five-blade armed reconnaissance and attack helicopter designed for the United States Army. The RAH-66 program was canceled in 2004, before mass production began, after nearly $7 billion was spent on the program. During the early 1980s, the U.S. Army began formulating a requirement for the replacement of its helicopters then in service, resulting in the Light Helicopter Experimental program. In 1991, the Boeing-Sikorsky team was chosen to produce prototypes. The Comanche would incorporate stealth technologies, featuring a number of designs previously untried. It was to employ advanced sensors in its reconnaissance role, and was intended to designate targets for the AH-64 Apache. The aircraft was also armed with missiles and rockets to destroy armored vehicles. Two RAH-66 prototypes were built and conducted flight testing from 1996 to 2004. Since the cancellation the prototypes have been placed on display.

the launch queue shifts from one side to the other so that you launch the missile at an angle that will make it cross the beam.....I believe it is calculating for the width of the chopper.... the missile location and the laser location are like 6 feet apart(or more)...so if you were to shoot the missile perfectly straight it might not cross the beam at first to be able to start guidance But...if you shoot it at a slight angle inward (like the game now has it modeled)...the the missile is guaranteed to cross the lasers path about 100m in front of you and then start being guided to target having said that...after launch the queue is moving to the other side in preparation to launch the next missile...it has nothing to do with the guidance of the missile you previously launched moments ago. P.S. the vikhrs are more likely to miss now then in previous versions....I also have notice more misses...but I dont believe it has to do with the problems you mentioned....I think it has to do with better (or worse) missile modeling, now you can miss even with a perfect shot because the missile is never perfectly on the laser, it is spiraling around it in a right hand turn (its fins only deflect one direction).....so..if it happens to be on a big spiral, trying to get back close to the laser when approaching the target, it has a chance to fly right by or hit the ground (in front of target) instead of hitting the target... the vikhrs no longer have a 99.999% chance to hit....perfect shooting conditions no longer equal a perfect hit everytime like in previous versions of the game....misses are going to be much more often and for unseen reasons, just like in real life... P.P.S. i guess this explanation is for the Ka-50 only....I dont fly the Su-25, so I'm not sure about its hud queues and launch parameters

my DCS:World folder is at 15gb right now no comment on whether I care or not....just putting it out there for ppl to compare

the subject on trees is as old as this DCS website itself.....the devs dont need to stop what they are doing for you to have a solid answer....you just need to learn to use the search function

thats exactly why it was put there.....closer to the COG mean more predictability and controllability = better accuracy

the BS works for me at night just fine....use NVG, adjust shkval contrast and brightness, switch to manual fire mode.....o yes, the shark works just fine at night......

already been discussed....use the search function to find the thread....someone already fixed the mission and a few others edit....found it for ya.... http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=105823

a god damn cup holder......and an ashtray......best way to get bounced is to have a beer in one hand and a joint in the other.....thats why the ruskies lost the cold war....no ashtray.... ....on a serious note...what do you need a rwr for.....if your high enough to get hit by a slammer or radar sam...your doing it wrong anyways and a rwr isnt going to save you...... .....the best thing that could fictionally happen to the ka-50 right now is heaters on the wing tips.......and i like the IR camera idea......

http://www.lockonfiles.com/topic/34263-guv-8700-gun-pod-for-dcs-black-shark/ Beczl did the GUVpod for BS1 a while ago.....and did rocket pod upgrades....ahh, the good ol' days

http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=89282&highlight=monitor+setup+guide http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=96116 http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=84266&highlight=GUI+fix all these are good reads.....PeterP has a wealth of info on this subject....search his name in the membership for his post and you will learn all you need to know about setting default FOV, setting min and max FOV, motitor and view port settings, setting default head positions, ect,ect,....good luck to ya

evga760sc w/ acx cooler for $256 is overclocking and getting higher scores then the stock 680..... pretty bad ass considering the gtx680 was $500 at release..... keep in mind that a killer cpu is much more important in the flight sim world....dont buy a $800 card...put that money towards saving up for a i7 @ 4.3ghz ..........DCSis maxed out untill they multi-thread further....you will never runs mass scenarios till they move the AI and script system to their own core...or create a bubble system......unless you have three or more monitors runing at 1080....you will not see massive need for a titan with DCS right now.... http://www.legitreviews.com/evga-geforce-gtx-760-superclocked-w-acx-cooling-video-card-review_2240 skip to page 14 ...

you are saving a mark with a label....the Abriss doesnt know you are killing things....you can erase your marks manually....but the Datalink and Abriss arent going to do it for you....

Your Thread Resurrection skill has increased by 1

I think everyone has lost sight here....its not about whether the cobra is useful in combat....its not about thrust vectoring...missiles...or how many hypothetical situations we can think of... .....the OP is asking (or at least one of his questions), since the real plane can do it.....is it going to be modeled.....what do you think...yes or no....not whether its useful enough to get modeled...not is it worth the time....not if its a bad tactic....not if it will get him killed....not if he should buy a gtx770 or a 780....not if its raining today in San Diego...... .....is the AFM Su-27 going to be able to do a cobra????.........i think its a fair question....and I can't wait to here your answer....

I hope there is no weekly update just to make this thread even stupider......take that you impatient pricks...

+1 to going to nvidia webpage.....other that that I check my nvidia setting panel in windows and ask it to check for updates...though that hasn't work for me in this last driver update....

for some reason, I feel that Luthiers and crew will focus on the eastern front more then the west......I foresee a 109, a stuka, a IL-2, and a Yak, Mig or Lagg russian fighter.....then we move on to the Pacific.....lol....just wishful thinking.... ...back on the B-17 topic......just an Ai B-17 would give mission builders so much to work with....+1000 on the hopes that the pics posted isnt a fake

770 is a great card for the price....if your rich get something better (780 or Titan).... i personally buy in the 60s.......260s, 460, and now the 760s....but I own Asus and EVGA SLI boards...so its hard for me to buy two $500 cards because I'm poor, but two $250 evga 760 is bad ass in a SLI board....there is no game out as of right now (8/6/13) that Sli 760s wont run....stacking bigger cards is for ppl with money to burn and those that want outrageous benchmarking numbers..... ....Nvidia all the way....I'll never go back.....and I always buy EVGA..... http://www.superbiiz.com/detail.php?p=EV-G760ACX&c=fr&pid=e7b5e13d5d73846f389b530186cce5c77ef0fbdb93d821b2078f7f2e3436f949&gclid=CJjes_y96bgCFSYV7AodIA8AsQ ^^^ EVGA760 /w ACX cooler $250usd^^^^^ ^^not a bad price considering I remember spending $400 for 2 gtx260's ($200 each) just a couple years ago....those 760s are ten times the cards for just $100 more^^^ P.S. stacking cards becomes very beneficial once you need more then two DVI ports