Jump to content

Corrigan

Members
  • Posts

    1793
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Corrigan

  1. Excited to hear it! Since I guess my question was missed, I'll ask it again: will be still be able to "pre-purchase" for the reduced price after the beta is released? Or will it sell for its full price then?
  2. Yeah, I can confirm that there was no rapid beeping to indicate radar lock in that track. The MWS worked and the aircraft started deploying chaff, but no lock was indicated before that. Pretty serious bug.
  3. Yep, editing is great but having been made 2009 isn't enough of an excuse for using that music. :D
  4. Let's not forget that the JA-37 wasn't the only version.
  5. Will the pre-purchase offer continue to be available through the period of open beta? Or does anything drastic happen when the OB is released?
  6. In that case just disregard. Thanks!
  7. It looks just as though the heat source was between the pilot and the HUD, and not in front. Obviously wrong. Happens to every aircraft I've tried. My heat blur setting is on HIGH.
  8. Correct. DCS really, really doesn't need more trainers.
  9. Thanks for taking the time to do this, we all appreciate it.
  10. I love that you guys post WIP stuff! We really appreciate it. I think it's very much the correct choice for building excitement too; I'll be making a purchase shortly! Can't wait.
  11. Really don't think this is much of a problem. Just press whatever you have bound to retract them to ensure they're retracted.
  12. Thanks all! This was offline!
  13. So I finally got around to learning how to do this properly. I celebrated by making a video! Lemme know what you think. 4Wsg73SsT40
  14. If they made that t-shirt featuring Viggen I would wear nothing else for the rest of my life. Hey devs, are there any immediate plans for some more videos? I understand if it's getting near crunch time and you have better things to do though.
  15. Either I'm being stupid or you are. This whole concept is nothing but scaling up objects. Things disappear when they no longer subtend a solid angle of at least one pixel. There is no way of keeping them visible without making them bigger than they should be, or "out of scale".
  16. For me, how well done the module is (in terms of realism and other things) is much more important than the capabilities of the aircraft.
  17. Thanks for that diagram, awesome. Nothing better than this kind of realism.
  18. I wonder if this has something to do with wing flex? Maybe some of the points of the tube aren't following the wing moving as they should.
  19. Awesome. Some of the most fun I've had in DCS was without killing anything. A transport plane would be fantastic!
  20. Have you recorded all the proper sounds, like APU (does it have one?) and canopy motor etc, like visited a real plane? PS: France, love and support from all of us.
  21. For me, the blockiness of the cockpit shadows is very distracting, and has been for many years. It sucks that the fantastic cockpit detail is spoiled by super blocky and flickering shadows. Is there a reason for them looking this bad? Does increasing their resolution mean all other shadows have to be high-res or something? If not, I can't imagine doubling the resolution of the cockpit shadows having such a drastic performance hit. What are the chances of this being addressed by a mod or a future patch? Is it possible from an engine standpoint? Do you guys want to see this improved? Discuss!
  22. Thanks for all the sneak peeks we're getting! It's fantastic. I can't wait!
  23. I couldn't reproduce either. Related to that specific livery, maybe?
×
×
  • Create New...