Jump to content

Corrigan

Members
  • Posts

    1793
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Corrigan

  1. Okay, so I started your mission and I do get kinda low fps too. Not 20 fps though. Looking straight ahead at mission start, while paused, I get 60 fps with mirrors off and 38 fps with mirrors on. I see fps as low as 30 if I fly for a while after mission start. My settings are attached. I think it's something strange there, along the coast between Sochi-Adler and Gudauta. Moving a free-look camera there drops fps from 150 to 40 quite drastically. Maybe a model that has too many polygons or something? ED need to take a look.
  2. I also prefer the timed option. Something like, when stick held at full extension for 0.5 s, you get the extra control authority for 2 s, or shorter if you let go. But, obviously, giving us the choice between that and a hotkey in the Special options menu would be the best possible solution.
  3. Since I'm not really a fan of vomiting, I'm gonna keep it set to CHARGES I think. :p
  4. But you're the one who introduced the phrase "at" as implied by "by". Wow, friend, calm down. I thought my comment was obviously light-hearted; we all seem pretty desperate for the release. When things end with ";)", they're not usually meant as dead-serious insults. But yes, enough of this crap. Let's talk about why the French are so good at making nice shapes. I mean, look at this thing. Absolutely exquisite.
  5. ;)
  6. Спасибо, Alexandr, your videos and stories are amazing.
  7. Beautiful.
  8. As seen at 1:50 in this video by the eminent AlexandrT. I'm not sure if this is a DCS:W bug, or specific to the Mi-8, but I suspect the former.
  9. I have to say that I really don't think it should be. Pics look fantastic, as always.
  10. Desperation can do strange things to people. ;)
  11. I've never been to Vegas but it doesn't seem that outlandish.
  12. Buddy, you're failing to follow your own logic. At 03:00 (or "at December") includes 03:00.59 (or the 31st).
  13. There was supposed to be a patch for 2.0 last week. My guess is that they're gonna include the 2000 in the delayed release of that.
  14. Those settings look reasonable, but I still can't compare without a mission file. I did created one like you said, and had 70+ fps, but it was a different location on the map so we can't be sure. I can also say that I've never ever seen 22 fps in 1.5.
  15. I don't mind betas, as long as they don't do a Belsimtek and keep it in beta for years as what seems to be an excuse to leave it unfinished and make other things.
  16. Exactly, and toe brakes. And zoom view, if you wanna use that. People usually set that to the "friction" slider on the right side of the WH throttle. Not sure whether resetting to defaults is needed. If it is, you can just rename or move the saved games/DCS/config/inputs folder, and the game will create a new one with everything default upon launch.
  17. Too silent? RAZBAM are doing an amazing job talking to us here on the forums, showing us new things etc. They post more than I do!
  18. I don't think you'll be disappointed, it's a very nice piece of gear. The A-10C is entirely mapped, just plug and play! You just need to correct the axis assignments since DCS has some trouble with doing that itself.
  19. That's great news, in that case. Always a pleasure to find out that things are more realistic than you suspected.
  20. Alright buddy, let's get this sorted out. There's something wrong somewhere (which is good news!), that's not the performance you should be getting. First of all, show us your settings (screenshot the options page). 22 fps sounds low but flat shadows = off and a few other settings can really take a toll. Second, attach a mission in which you get poor performance at the beginning. "Create fast mission" randomizes a mission so we can't use that for testing. Also, that "video memory" number that the game is reporting is always that high. I'm not sure how it works but it might be VRAM+RAM occupied by the game, in which case 6 gigs is fine.
  21. Depends on how many bonus points you have, obviously.
  22. 8 has been fine for me since 1.5 and 2.0 came out.
  23. I have basically an identical system to yours, as you can see. The only important difference is that I have 8 gigs of RAM currently (although I have 16 fresh GB on my desk ready to go in) Send me your mission/track and I can take a look at the performance! Although I will say that I have never seen anything like 22 fps in single player, in an F-15, at that altitude.
  24. It's BYOS though.
×
×
  • Create New...