Corrigan

Can't get mine to work! Is this known? PS. It looks great. The external model is phenomenal.

Thanks!

Formula Dassault, more like. :)

So if you're not pulling g's, the controls (mapping of stick to control surfaces) are identical, right? The only difference is that the FBW disallows/changes some control inputs in high-performance manoeuvres, to differing extents in the two modes?

RAZBAM are making a move on the throne of community interaction, where LNS currently sit. Is there room for two? Who will sit in whose lap otherwise? Stay tuned to find out.

That's what we have beta for. :)

Don't worry, it takes a lot more than that to offend me. I was just pretty amazed at your picture. 10/10. If you ever make DCS: Sackringspinne i will pre-purchase.

You won't see Viggen before Christmas.

Regarding Armat: no thanks. I'd love to fly SEAD in a full-fidelity 4th gen aircraft, but the 2000C is not that aircraft. :) Did I read somewhere that the FBW system/autopilot will compensate for asymmetric load? If so, is this done completely automatically?

The latter part is known. There's a weird thing going on when flying under the Hoover dam bridge, which I predict you did.

That's pretty impressive!

You sure that's not a grapefruit?

Hey, do you have an orange I could borrow?

Do I come across insane? I'll peel it and pick off most of that white nasty stuff like everybody else compos mentis.

If it's not out by tomorrow, I will eat an orange. Yep, I said that. I'll even post pics. Quick, screenshot this post before I edit.

I haven't seen it but it sounds like someone's gotten their coordinates reflected. Should be an easy fix.

It's quite simple, really. The J stands for jakt, which means fighter (lit. hunt, hunter aircraft). A stands for attack, which I'm sure you don't need translation help with. The primary role is just the first letter in the designation; JA is fighter-attack and AJ(S) is attack-fighter(spaning = recon).

Well, sometimes our sense of beauty coincides remarkably well with truth/things that work well. I'm sure that's the case in aerodynamics and aircraft design, at least sometimes, but I can only really say for certain regarding my own field of fundamental physics.

Awesome post, good job buddy. BST should count themselves lucky to get these kind of tests/reports.

That number is, as I recall, for the entire 20th century.

I think that'll work out great, CptSmiley. Thanks for listening to our feedback!

I did catch that, just couldn't resist. Although I have to add, once Viggen is released people on multiplayer servers will start saying that a lot more. :D

What did we do this time? ;)

But we shouldn't be getting the same performance as in central Las Vegas. There's something wrong there.

Yes, and also further west along the coast, up by Sochi-Adler, I get horrible performance. Much worse than anywhere else on the map, and without there being much visible detail.