Corrigan

Yes please!

Aren't you talking about different things? Missile g limit vs. how hard the aircraft can manoeuvre when firing.

You're a machine, Sid. Good work.

Thanks buddy, I was gonna look into a fix like that after I heard what the official plans are.

This is what I used to have, and I think it's great. I want the most realistic cockpit layout and at the same time not to be completely helpless when I forget a switch. Is there any way for me to have this now, or are the changes permanent?

Thanks for the reply. In that case, yeah, I'd say the transition should be smoother; that was the primary reason I assumed it was a bug. Keep it up, she's improving at a great pace!

I set down on the main gear, idle the throttle and deploy speed brakes, and continue aero-braking on my back wheels. To make sure the throttle is idle, I push it forward slightly and then back again; you can hear this change in engine note at 0:22 . Then I apply the brakes and let the aircraft tip onto the nosewheel. As soon as I do this, the engine aperture relaxes and the engine note changes. Note that the throttle remained at idle during all this. This is a bug, right? It's reproducible. I have verified my axis settings, nothing is interfering with my throttle. I am using the toe brakes on my pedals to wheel brake.

home-on-jam, I believe.

Has anybody been able to get 2.0.1?

This thread was very good but has devolved into "feelings" about how draggy that nosecone is. If we wanna convince ED that there's something wrong enough to change, we need to do better. Could someone good at 3D modelling make a model of the front from pictures, perhaps? Then we might be able to calculate the drag. EDIT: I had an unrefreshed version of the thread, there have been some helpful posts since :)

Very reasonable approach. That's certainly not worse than being able to use padlocking, labels etc etc via keyboard shortcuts.

There are no flaps.

It's remarkable that this is your first DCS module. After 20 mins in the air (and about 10 in external view on the ground, drooling) I absolutely love it.

180-190 kts is far too fast, as we concluded in some thread somewhere. I also noticed that the nose stayed high even when completely hands-off. Bug or aerodynamic feature/FBW? I don't know!

I set it down on the main gear and left the nose high for aero braking, and even let go of the stick. She just held her attitude. I even went into external view, completely hands off. So well-behaved! Feels incredibly sharp in AA mode in the air, christ what a machine.

It's one of the most beautiful modules in DCS. I'm floored by the quality of the model and cockpit, holy crap. Fantastic. Just such a pity that the mirrors are inop right now, would have completed the picture.

Thanks!

Formula Dassault, more like. :)

So if you're not pulling g's, the controls (mapping of stick to control surfaces) are identical, right? The only difference is that the FBW disallows/changes some control inputs in high-performance manoeuvres, to differing extents in the two modes?

RAZBAM are making a move on the throne of community interaction, where LNS currently sit. Is there room for two? Who will sit in whose lap otherwise? Stay tuned to find out.

That's what we have beta for. :)

Don't worry, it takes a lot more than that to offend me. I was just pretty amazed at your picture. 10/10. If you ever make DCS: Sackringspinne i will pre-purchase.

You won't see Viggen before Christmas.

Regarding Armat: no thanks. I'd love to fly SEAD in a full-fidelity 4th gen aircraft, but the 2000C is not that aircraft. :) Did I read somewhere that the FBW system/autopilot will compensate for asymmetric load? If so, is this done completely automatically?

The latter part is known. There's a weird thing going on when flying under the Hoover dam bridge, which I predict you did.