SkateZilla

Yeah, Cause WT has an accurate Physics and Radar Emitter Model on the scale as DCS, as well as the Same Graphical Level of Detail. Please do not compare the two.

It would prolly be a good idea to make new presets w/ MT anyway, But the Binaries will only be separate for so long, The new version of the App may be ready by the end of March, but it really depends on circumstances beyond my control (and EDs for that matter). Myself and the other testers have been abusing the new functions, some are still WIP, others are being cleaned and condensed.

There is no way to use the launcher with MT currently.

not in the current app build no, the New App when released will support all the new goodies, but it's still in testing.

DCS Will Crash if it's more than 32-Threads (ie ThreadRipper).

1. We dont have a Briddle Launch system/carrier. 2. requires SDK 3. requires SDK

So do we have Rando Meg Ryan Pictures in the Rio Pit now?

VR is very much just as CPU Bottlenecked as 2D. Considering the CPU Bottleneck is caused by Draw Calls and Object counts, and when in VR everything is called/Rendered 2x...

The only preventing issues w/ the A-4E Mod, are A: It's a community mod, the code and content have been worked on by too many different people to actively list, credit, and get permission to commercialize the product, etc. let alone make sure they get their % of sales, who is responsible for what part, who is getting paid for what part, who owns what part etc etc. B: The License to produce and sell it was significant 10 years ago, I imagine nothing has changed w/ McD License under Boeing since. But as far as Module Complete-ness, and Content, it's well above a few of the 3rd Party modules.

the A-4E certainly does meet and exceed requirements for inclusion and is better than some of the 3rd party official modules. If ED was to include a new free module, it would likely be a trainer, T-38 or T-7 etc.

A lot of people are having issues with that mainboard and memory. Jay also had this board fail on him.

Kenny Loggins and Cheaptrick Queen and Dio goes into the F-16s Iceman and Jester are renamed to Hollywood and Wolfman.

Something that kills FPS in DCS is DRAW CALLS. Having enough Cache to store more directly on the CPU Lowers the CPU Overhead on the draw calls.

Its Valid in DCS. B.Die Ram + SMA + VCACHE = Better Performance in DX9/11 Graphics Engines.

Dev dropped his PB and J sandwich on his keyboard and causes a Sugar Rush in the DCS Core Engine resulting in a Glitch...

You can tick the checkbox, But you can't set a resolution as low as the user would like to in the UI, hence editing the LUA directly, and setting the true value, at the same time just to avoid a second restart of the sim for that change to take affect.

The Release Frequency was decreased based on feedback and analysis. ED went to slower Release schedule to allow more testing of builds, I doubt the release frequency does a 180 and goes back to rapid fire releases. Where was any specific feature promised to be released "This Month"? I don't see any newsletter that says Coming in March, Coming in April, Coming in July. Speculation, Considering it's not even up for Preorder yet

It was delayed because it wasn't ready, the Specifics on what wasn't ready doesn't matter. It wasn't ready, it was delayed. If you want specifics as to what delays software, then you need to prepare to be disappointed because most major developers don't share specifics on pre-release software code issues, and the one's that do usually regret it (cough 343, cough cough).... It's the nature of the beast, The Communication is there, but specifics are usually only communicated internally due to the nature of the beast.... When too much laundry is air out, the community goes nuts (again.. cough...343... cough).

Set the Resolution in the / Saved Games / DCS / Config/ Options.lua, then change line: ["mirror_use_DCS_resolution"] = false, to ["mirror_use_DCS_resolution"] = true,

T-38 is visually similar to the F-5E, Systems and Powerplant wise it's not.

Argument 775

It Depends on the Cockpit, Arguments are different for each. Which cockpit?

Honestly, It wouldn't make sense to develop a Full Fidelity Aircraft and give it away for free to everyone, there's no guarantee it would bring in more players and more sales of other Aircraft, while removing any potential sales of the aircraft that is now free. Any 3rd and 4th Generation Aircraft is complex and takes time and money to develop, those resources for ED are likely better spent on continued MT, Vulkan, DC, and other Core technologies. and for the 3rd parties, better spent on supporting their own projects. If Full Fidelity aircraft leading to a purchase is the sole argument, then that's what the 2 week trial option is for. There is no Official A-4 Module in development.