-
Posts
5759 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by D4n
-
Video is from SD-10's POV. Here, SD-10, basically directly after launch, managed to do a super hard 11° turn within under 1 second. (G-force indications sadly are missing at that time in tacview, as you can see. Another DCS bug most likely, right?) Does any other (non-thrust-vectoring) DCS missile also do such super-hard turns directly after launch? [Tacview-question: Is there any way to indicate milliseconds in TacView time? (only full seconds really is a too inaccurate unit for analyzing this... )]
-
See trackfile, screen stays black in the end for quite some time, although barely any G-forces were encountered at that moment. (please don't comment on my tryhard takeoff attempt to get some AIM-9 off the rail onto that flanker xD ) https://drive.google.com/file/d/1kAxnlE8pF0PzQDTIpF28RzyU1HbtYsIt/view?usp=sharing
-
See video and trackfile (using latest AMD driver, please don't ask me if I used latest driver... xD ). https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Z3UlrdHUQyrODWeqs6yrqtuUjhueJrnJ/view?usp=sharing
-
See trackfile. (all other DCS jets/modules that I know of are able to rearm with engines running.) F-15notLettingRearm.trk
-
Chaff is affected (flares may be aswell), after rearming chaff, user has to turn EXP knob off and on again, as per earnil's post here: https://forums.eagle.ru/topic/251943-as-intended-rearming-resets-the-cms-doesnt-rearm-the-cms/?tab=comments#comment-4476802 Trackfile attached. EXPknobRequiresTurningToFixChaffCountermeasures.trk (intended behaviour would be that EXP knob doesn't require any user interaction after "rearm complete" ground-crew reply.)
-
Currently, when clicking on them, they don't move at all. Assuming that they aren't touchpads, please animate them moving inwards a little bit when clicking on them.
-
Currently it seems the only way to release the lock is by assigning a keybinding to it. Please allow mouseclicking on the lock to release it.
- 1 reply
-
- 1
-
-
Same again it seems dcs.log-20201229-121847.zip
-
yesss, managed to reproduce. Even with content, one box reads "ewr" short 22 MB .trk: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-F7W8e506IcYQAMc8rEPK63GHkOUIKRI/view?usp=sharing
-
uboats, did you have the F10 map open before or while other user placed the marker? Maybe that is related, and maybe no content should be in the marker box to reproduce this bug, or maybe the bug only occurs on Syria map, I will try to reproduce on Syria.
-
@BIGNEWYStill bugged, example .miz attached. AGLbug.miz
-
You tested it with another player? It occurs on multiplayer servers with markers from other players. I have trackfiles, but they are huge...
-
Clicking on thread-title shows last post in thread instead of first post
D4n replied to D4n's topic in Forum and Site Issues
Still happening... Please fix asap. -
not comparable in which way, which systems have more raw processing power (FLOPS)?
-
negative, plain wrong, never had this occur in any other DCS module, here an F-16 track for example, it's not affected... So now we wasted almost 9 months on this Harrier-bug issue, arguing whether it's up to Razbam to fix or not... great, great..... Please fix asap, Razbam! server-20201228-173744.trk
-
STILL bugged!!! added tags "very high priority mp bug - causing trouble within pvp teams due to not being able to ask the marker-creator (player) about status of his markers" and "bug since nearly 1 year now".
-
very unrealistic afaik, due to ground-clutter. AWACS point is to detect flying (low-flying aswell, okay, but mainly high-flying) aircraft. "was" ? ~65 E-3 are still in use in NATO and other countries... With the updated description, that it now detects aircraft on runways? (Just asking to be sure that the report is updated to the team.) @BIGNEWY
-
But doesn't that mean that it does image-processing, which requires huge processing power? So AIM-9Xs have something like an Intel i9 or hexa-core Ryzen 5 (or even Threadripper) in them? (processing-power wise.)
-
Aaaand another crash, this time probably related to waypoint-logic. Thank god this time DCS-crash-reporter most likely managed to transmit the crash to ED. (would be nice to get a "crash-data submitted succesfully"-message btw...) dcs.log-20201228-142737.zip
-
There is no public source indicating that an AIM-9X can distinguish very hot flares from a (not so hot) idle jet-engine, correct? May it depend on the types of flares used? And ED never claimed that they have access to data that they aren't allowed to share, right? So this trackfile would prove to be a valid DCS bug-report? What one can definitely say is that it ruins the DCS PvP experience for all those players on the opposite end, to have a basically un-evadable thrust-vectoring missile like that one... There you go.... ~8 out of 10 -9X hitting the idle-engine Harrier... PreFlare AIM-9X impossible.trk
-
CTD upon changing MFD colors in Harrier (a new feature which Razbam didn't mention anywhere apparently......) dcs.log
-
Emotes/smileys not properly saved in browser cache/RAM
D4n replied to D4n's topic in Forum and Site Issues
Still taking quite long.