Jump to content

D4n

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    5759

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by D4n

  1. D4n
    Oh, then "HP" or "HDP" would be way better, "HARM (display) page", alright!
  2. D4n
    Can anyone confirm that this missile in DCS has an unrealistically high chaff resistance, higher than any DCS AIM-7 Sparrow for example?
  3. D4n
    Do we even know if Polychop did acquire the license by Bell?
  4. D4n
    And as previously stated, it'd make sooo much more sense if "HAD" 'd be renamed to "HAM", harm attack mode. Because the actual display is actually called MFD (or MFCD)...
  5. D4n
    Negative. Okay! Thanks! Seems you linked 2 posts though, in your post. One from 11.9.2016, and also one from 6.12.2015.
  6. D4n
    Oh, it's only that Enigma claimed that it's a known bug that it shouldn't even reach over 13k and go fast.
  7. D4n
    Whoa, I just discovered, Viggen can even pull over 11G (very very shortly), while often I'm strangely also stuck at 4-5G for several seconds even though I have stick full aft... (then it jumps up to 8G.). Strange
  8. D4n
    Even in their own manual they state that the service ceiling is far above 13k, Enigma.
  9. D4n
    Indeed, ruler became quite a bit less useful with some patch last year. After such a long time a fix for this would be really welcome. Having that fixed again will save us mission designers quite some time when editing missions.
  10. D4n
    Couldn't find any source yet about the 1350 kph being jet-engine limit or airframe limitation. If engine limitation, then the script should be removed obviously.
  11. D4n

    Damage model

    D4n replied to NaCH's topic in Bugs and Problems

    reminds me of this moment I had 3 years ago, after I shot the player. https://youtu.be/zVUQCKMRoO0?t=76 HB damagemodel is cursed
  12. D4n
    Over 3 years later, we're all still waiting, ED.
  13. D4n
    Exactly. Come on HB, more and more servers are adding the feared "instantly explode if you accelerate above 1350 kph"-script... It's a terrifying development, and you know it best... It's rather shocking even, to be honest. And that's obviously DEFINITELY not gonna help you guys at Viggen module sales... Isn't that logical??
  14. D4n
    As more and more of us need to view and hide markers more and more often (multiplayer servers), please allow setting a keybinding for "mark label on/off" F10 map feature.
  15. D4n

    Damage model

    D4n replied to NaCH's topic in Bugs and Problems

    Damn, okay. Well, they did get the Forrestal in though!
  16. D4n
    would be great to see a setting to limit AWACS callouts to a certain range
  17. D4n
    Will do. For now, I have another video with another issue, system just randomly shut down and instant pitch down. So far only occured once. https://youtu.be/mWsneozAFqM?t=144
  18. D4n
    Negative, no SAM, killmessage in chat didn't say "shot by SAM" in that case, only "died" message. The condition I'm guessing is that when the airframe has endured many high G maneuvers and several times accelerating through Mach 1 and down again, before it occurs
  19. D4n

    Damage model

    D4n replied to NaCH's topic in Bugs and Problems

    Oh my, you can even rip off your wing (ground contact in flight), and you can still see your wing attached. Please please fix the damagemodel to also miss the wing if it's ripped off of the flightmodel. Edit: WOW, this thread is over 2 years old and it's STILL not fixed! wicked!
  20. D4n
    Very low level flight, somewhere above mach 1.1. shorter track not available sadly.
  21. D4n
    It already happened to me twice now on Syria within only like 10 hours of flying the module. Trackfile attached. Happened super shortly after reaching bingo fuel warning (24% warning). https://ufile.io/lmqrvjn6
  22. D4n
    Yep, R530F EM still not giving launch warning... this is just awful guys
  23. D4n
    There's still no mention of the RWR fix in changelog, does this mean that a radar tracked target will still not receive a launch warning?? (open beta changelog from july 28: "launch warnings still in progress")
  24. D4n
    No, rather to see how important it is for me to start flying every single PvP sortie in VR, to have a realistic combat experience, instead of like being in VR only 1 out of 100 sorties or so. (but on one specific server it could also increase my risk of getting kicked from the server while flying in VR, which must be one of the most nauseous experiences a DCS player can overcome. Hope I don't throw up on my keyboard in such case.)
  25. D4n
    1. Way too high risk of dishonest answer, so that's a big no, and 2. even then, you'd have to ask every single player in the PvP server. SkateZilla, you forgot one important point. You didn't reply what your guess (or knowledge) is on how many in PvP use TiR/VR, whether you agree with the rumored 90% or not... Without such reply you shouldn't claim whether there is any point in continuing the discussion or not. What, how even, if EVERY SINGLE PvP player can super easily change their nicknames 24/7??
×
×
  • Create New...