Baco

The the instalation.. its working Fine on my end. But the ED2 as well as the Rafale are still there on the Plain one...

+100 yes please. Important for Mission making and Inmersion.

Its a guess, but, wherever you see names, is detailed area.. and the empty spaces on th borders of that would be just tiles...

Agree, bomb damage rignt now is not accurate, but then again, neither is damage model of anything on the ground or sea... making a detailed (anithing better than teh stupid percentage bar we have now)damage model of objects, and vehicles, a priority would be a treat for Ground Pounders all over...

well it IS working again, fellows. I just made a mission with them and show OK on ME, and thats why I am asking should my tragets be my colaition or teh enemies....

Stop Teasing!!! you are trully killing me! jajaja (My left kideny for a working collossus...) By the way, A-4E-c allready works, you just need arrresting wires.. the scooter has its own catapult code in it...

+100!

Definately!

Hi all, I was wondering if there is a way to change the textures of a given ship, let say the CVN Carl Vinson, for instance... I did find teh files but it doesnt let me re write them. Is there a away to trick DCS into accepting new textures or it is necesary to introduce a whol enew unit? AND given teh recent evnets I guess that Using an existing part of DCS is a big no, no. right?

Iron Hand the Macho way... Yes please!

With Syria being HUGE, and having not that many airbases, New Marianas map, Having so much room at the Caucasus and persian gulf... Woudlnt, it be cool to have a ME Placeble Auxiliary Airstrip that would give you, lets say 4 spawn points, so we could place our own air bases anywhere flat on any map? Any chance of getting this?

Really? moving Statics are free for all? so If I place equipment and pesonle in a ground base, everybody will see them? That is a very pleasent surprise!!!! Thanks fro the Info Rudel!

Hi Guys, one small question. Targets on the range need to be opfor or frinedly? Menaing If I am flying Blue do I put the targets as red or as Blue so it detetcts hits? Thanks in advance

We need more static objects, Airfield equipment, Lights, more LIFE to our simulated missions. Specially since ED inisit in braking down teh allready existing MODS to populate the lacking DCS world.. Not all of us opperate from carriers you know.. and YEs by the way I do have the SC but lots of my friends Dont.. We NEED in-game, standar Statick objetcs, personel, equipment, lights, and utilitarian vehicles for the bases..

Tried it again. ligjhts are ON, but do not illuminate much.. its like a dim light.

any chance to get a layered template for skining the Orion?

More beautiful every day!!!

Thanks for the clarification Skatezilla! good to know. Pitty because no radios mean no AAR. Hopefully maybe RAZBAM wants to pick up the glove and give us a flyable B/Q and C/P...

Well the Karel Doorman was the ARA Veinticinco de Mayo (V2), and of course the ARA Independencia (V2) was also a Colossus, so close enough... Let us know how it goes I am more than willing to skin the two argie Carriers...

And That is what I find So Intriguin.. they give ED the license for the F/A-18 but NOT the A-4 Skyhawk?.. weird to say the least... Someone should aporach Lockhead Martin and ask about the A-4-AR witch is theirs as I understand it, and the avionics si all LM, since its a mini F-16 APG-67 ARG a nerfed 66, and a better engine...

And the dev team does not want that kind of presure.. They have already stated tehy do not want to becoem a 3rd party asociate. And its quite obviouse that TheMC donneld douglas fee must be astronomical, otehrwise soemone would have picked up the B or C models or even the F or M...

I would Like to request the Opposite: Make Airfields able to accept more clinets than its parking spaces so, for instance, bases in northen IRAN can be used by more than 3 clients.... Or let every plane Spawn "on Ground".... BUt yeah It would be cool to be able to control where each plane spwns.. myabe get a waiting list for spawn points you can place clients .. Then again I do understand teh complexiti of this request.

I really cant get why some people get threaten by options that make life easy for casual players... Maybe I want to feel the inmersion fo having to refuel but dont have "a lifetime" to learn it. Maybe I want to do a MP mission with my squad and have AAR in it, but dont want to force anyone to become proficient at it... WHAT IS WRONG with that.. tell me... I am a parent, I have a full time job, I share domestic responsabnilities with my partner... I dont have hours to learn special skill, or whatever... So what the heck is wrong with cutting me some slack and letting me ask for a simplified AAR method?

Again, the sim is less enjoyable if you cant see things, I realy dont care anymore if its super realistic or not, Dogfights in the 70s or 80s are imposible. My squad ended up using DOT lables in official missions, wich should not be unecesary... I dont get into WWII because of two reasons: damage model (witch is being adressed) and Visibility issues... So yeah its a thing.

I agree DCS is less enjoyable because of the spoting problem.. To the super realism police.. NO its a 2D monitor it is NOT realsitic. As it has been stated, There are no shines, no depth of field, no odd contrast, , so the human EYE cant distinguish pixels on a flat screen the same way a pilot can. No matter what you say, 1:1relation in a sim is NOT realistic. Spoting and specially losing sight in DCS is ridiculusly dificult. For a sim with the MAIN emphasis on BVR it was fine. Enter early Jets, it is imposible to dogfight... WWII a joke.