Baco

Hi guys, I have windows in spanish, and it does not detect the "saved games"folder because its in spanish.. how can I solve this?

Most amazing Mod! merci bien!

+100 There are several mods that are outstanding and Should be eincorporated as "standard", specialy regarding Vehicles, and Static Objects.

Decoy, I read somewhere that the continent might be added in a later stage. Now my question is: are they refering to the land mass or as a detailed area? is it posible to get a picture of teh scope of the map yet? Can I sugest havind at least a flat landmas to the west so we can at leat populate ourselves the bases?

I guess I´ll buy it when that happens... Regarding 2019 map, being december 6 (a day that will live in infamy ;) ) it looks like there will be no more maps on 2019.... (hoping to be wrong of course)...

Dont try to find the logic Harlikwin ;) some can´t stand a change in the Status Quo ;) I definetly agree with you, it comes to compensate on modern 2000s scenarios for the lack of modern SU 29/35 and MIG 30´s +

Thanks Shimmergloom! Good to know! and thanks for the link, will watch as soon as i can;)

I must agree, on a pure BFM scenario the J-10 should be superior to the Fc-1. But sicne they started developing the later, the J-10 was left with an older radar and less avionics development. The J-10 must be a good Interceptor with good CGI support, but every other aspect has been left undeveloped, it seems, in favor of the new batch of jets being produced: J-11 and J-20.

Even thow it resembles the Laavi, its a very different plane. Much heavier and less capable avionics wise. I woudl love a J-10. Specialy since Argentina was offered some by China. That said, i think the Fc-1 (JF-17) is a much more capable aircraft, much more developed and at a cheaper price. I think i might be a bit redundant to have both for now, when we could halve an attack palne like the Q-5.

Beautifull Jet, I would definetly buy it. Brasil also operates the AMX.

Is there any chance of releasing it with the module or soon after? I really want to paint this beauty...(and I am not that talented ;) ) Thanks in advace!

I think some people get the wrong idea.. A Fictional map would be a piece of desert, tundra, jungle, (insert desired terrain here) with towns, roads, bases and generic features like rivers, cosat or whatever, not neceserily depicting a specific place, so many palces can be simulates. It is faster and cheaper because you don not have to create any specific landmark, building or special ground object, you can use the ones allready in game. Also you don´t need to use DEM´s or accurate hight files. I believe it would be awesom if ED could give us basic tools to create generic maps, without having to have an uber team with proven skills... I am willing to spend countless hours placing objetcs, bases, roads and features. I just cant put toguether a team nor have enaough knoledge on 3d studio to create my own specific objects, to comply with EDs requirements to qualifie as a developer to get the SDKs. I am sure that like me there are meny more pople out there willing to create generic maps, and stuff, that do not compeate with real places full fledge maps sold as modules... still we could have a lot more playing places if Map Modding was encouraged. Just a thought tho.

Are you able to describe a bit in depth the bugs you encountered? or is it to early yet? You see, so far this module is too good to be true LOL, so I want to be on my toes.

Love the Pop culture refs in the last pick. Helmet with the superman logo and I specialy like the Lone "Ranger" on top ;)

I would settle for better damage model, not just a bar... Maybe 4 or 5 compartments or sections, hull aft, hull fwrd. structure, sensors, weapons... Usualy an Ati Ship missile will hit the superstructure, destroy systems but not actually sink the ship.- Now, bombs woudl tear the hull apart and the ship would sink relatively quickly.

Yeah guys 100 and 200 where generic numbers... Don´t get me wrong I do believe that 69.99 is the "set price" for all new modules, son hey , NP. I believe the Module is worth while. but there might be people on the fence too. Anyways, its almost here and I know I´ll buy it no matter the price even if i can´t aford it LOL

Because there were no P 47s in Korea or Vietnam ;)

Well Pakistan (the only other user of the JF-17 (so far) is not NATO, so it is a Red country ;) LOL No seriously, its not a NATO made plane so yes its closer to a "RED" airplane than a "BLUE" airplane if you will.. also Germany operates Mig 29´s it does not make it a "BLUE" Plane.. of sorts.. P.S. I believe planes have no nationalities or ideologies so, go figure ;)

$80 Might be a fair price, but selling prices are not based on Fairness.... Many who would give it a try might say, nah lets wait a year for a nice sale... Yeah it seems like an amazing module, but then again the F 14 gives you two different models AND a super carrier AND a campaign.. for the same 80 bucks... And yes 100 sales at $80 would give $8000 but 200 at $65 would give them $13000 ;) And any market makes better sales at perceived lower prices... You see. you might buy something you don´t need if its perceived as affordable...but not the other way around...

er.. The MIG 19 all tho not perfect is quite on par with any other release so far, and it is mission capable and quite fun. no show stoppers here. Not to defend anyone, but facts, are better than impressions ;)

well you can always buy second hand, to lower the cost.

I thought the F-4 Phantom II was on hold.. the order was Hind Mi 24. AH-1W, we already have the 18 and 16 in the pipe line, so I believe Phantom would be with a LOT of luck by 2021, 2022 if ever... Any non american Jet would be a welcome change... A mig 25 a dream, and a Ful fidelity SU 25 or 39 would be awesome too

Thanks a lot! I specially like the Greyhound and the Orion!

Exactly. even with ultra quick methods it would take at least 6 to 8 ours..

I don´t think we can or should tell ED how to run its business, But as a brain storming exercise i will leave my opinion: ED needs more 3rd Parties to grow, more people selling the product. ED needs to get its revenue from 3rd parties sales. While ED can concentrate in maintaining the Core Engine. That said, ED could charge once a year maybe a renewable license for the game, Kind of an Upkeep fee or expenses. The problem with the financial system is that you can not survive with only 4 or 5 3rd parties, making one or two modules a year. They need not 1 plane a year but several less complicated aircraft more often. Why, why super jets from 2000´s when the 60´s 70´s and 80´s are full of very interesting planes that share the same basic technology and systems.. why sell and F-18 and an F 16 in the span of 2 to 4 years, when maybe a Thud, a Corsair II, a Mig 17 and an SU 17 in one year would be more profitable.... Give us Full detailed ground objects and vehicle packs, give us ship packs, AI plane packs... KISS!!!!! Keep it Simple Stupid! ED should develop core systems, radar 60´s, radar 70´s, engine radial, engine turbo prop, engine gen 1 Jet, gen 2 Jet... so 3rd parties can tweek, and develop modules fairly fast , easy and in a Reliable way! there are a plethora of 3D artists out there, but very few coders, the SDK should have an emphasis on CODING packages... This system is doom to fail with 5 3rd parties where one quit, a few are struggling making Just "good enough" modules, and (so far only two stars, one proven the other one we will see).... Disclaimer: sorry for being so blunt. You need more parties doing Maps (no rocket science there, juts plain manual labor ;) 1 map every 3 years is just Not enough (earnings wise) You need more parties doing simpler jets (Look at the Mig 19, relative fast development (faster than any module so far from idea to sale, good all around quality, and a LOT OF FUN! to fly). you need Vehicles and objects OFICIAL packs, not just MODS, easy sales. You can lure some more 3rd parties with some transport or civilian planes that will sell less but at least is another income. but for that you NEED to work on the Core, ATC, VOR ILS, MAPS, more MAPS....