Lao Fei Mao

The main problem is not the Front Size, but the HUD itself is not that bigger, or not that closer to your seat, you may adjust the in cockpit view position by press "R-Ctrl+R-shift+Numb /" and "R-Ctrl+R-shift+Numb *" to get a satisfied one, then press"R-Alt+Num. 0" to save it.

Some chinese guy developed the AimXY, which use the environment magnetic field and wireless, has no dead end limits, you may buy it from Jack Mas's Taobao website.

If you got a good CPU water cooler, then 5.0HZ is the must go for 8700K, in-game temperature should be kept below 70C, otherwise lower the frequency.

If you didn't change your Mother board,CPU, or reinstalled your OS, then you can just copy the DCS folder into the new SSD, no need to touch the registration thing.

It's easier said than done. Maybe ten years later...

M-2000C has short leg, 530 missile can hardly win the 120B&C

Weird, I can call the ground crew to remove the chokes after the cold start and closed the canopy. Rearming and Refueling can only be executed after you shut down the engine

Do you use a hotas? Might be automatically binded with the X or Y axis of it.

I've ever met such problem, and sloved it by loosing the screw of dry clutch.

I recommend it too though it's not completed somehow. It's flyable and fun. There is no perfect module even the offical A-10C or Ka-50, which have bugs too. Who cares.

The ground details are near the one of ArmA2, would be great if ED can develop mature animation of infantry, at least the level of ArmA1.

I guess the bottleneck comes from the FSB。

I would recommend 9600K CPU, which is quite easily overclocked at 5.0HZ, DCS needs a high core frequency CPU. And better use 2X16G instead of 4X8HZ. And RTX2080 is not a better choice than GTX1080TI if you don't play other ray tracing games. It's easily to get a second hand GTX1080TI at a descent price.

I noticed too. The latest update lost the wing flex effect.

RIP and Condolence to his family.

-----You set the texture to low, set it to high.

As my observation, the preload radius is related with the pagefile size but not the physical RAM usage. The larger you set, the more pagefile caches and more loading time needed.

But ED are very busy, they promised too much for us. These models are absolutely not at priority, you have to wait, maybe 5 years.

Would it be possible to fire the AGM-154? I see AI do lots of shots of it.

-----No, I didn't mean the front size but the hud size or the HUD position relative to center of cockpit. If you dont' get close enough, you can't see the left,right, bottom full info on it. But at the position you can see full hud info, then you can barely see much of the front panel ,so weird feeling. I dont' believe pilots in real life are all tilt their body forward that much to do reading. This should be a improper cockpit 3D model, set the hud model a bit backward to the cockpit center.

If they do update the cockpit, better make the HUD bigger like the F/A-18C's. I can't see the full info on HUD unless I get very close to the HUD, weird feeling, the A-10C and F-15C have same problem.

The Maverick needs some time to warm up.

Since NVME SSD makes no obvious difference with SATA3 SSD on dcs. For those who want to kill the stutters, if your CPU or GPU is not outdated, then I suggest you to add more physical RAM, at least 32GB. The windows virtual RAM = physical RAM+pagefile on disk.And the pagefile MIS Afterburner monitored is actually the submitted parts of virtual RAM in windows task manager. So the bigger your physcial RAM is the less the pagefile used on the disk, on the condition you let the OS automatically manage the pagefile size. For example, I have 32GB RAM(31.9G in task manager), no more than 12GB used in game, it seems 19.9GB idled. No, it's not the truth, the 19.9GB are actually acting as the so called pagefile(MIS after burner monitored), sometime 19.9GB is not enough for DCS, then the pagefile on disk(7GB automatically allocated) would take part in. So if your RAM is less than 16GB, then the pagefile on disk would enlarge to 20+GB for some complicated scene.Great burden to disk. And the speed of disk couldn't match with the RAM, even the NVME disk.

Last night, after update the latest version, I dropped several GBU12 in CCRP mode, non of them hit the lasered targets, feels like they becomes unguided bombs. I double checked the laser code is always 1688, and laser switch is on, point lock target, made it as SPI. And I even tried from different altitude. Did anybody get the same problem?

F/A 18C and F-14 could let us play for quite a while. I don't care F-16 or other new modules. ED should take some time to improve the ambient of ATC or other radio, which are really lag behind.