Peter5on

This mod (RAE - RWR AUDIO EXPANSION) have authentic sounds of all contacts for F-16 RWR. ED should contact him and use he's sounds to make it quicker. https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/421081/

I wonder what they going to do with existing FC Mig-29, they will be practically the same planes. Its reminds me of VEAO Hawk flight model idea, having booth flight models for the same plane (simplified/professional) on the same server. I guess after release of full fidelity Mig-29 some server admins will ban simplified FC Mig-29. I personally think there is no point of doing the same plane. Make it K version for carrier operations otherwise it's a waste of time. Complaining about no redfor fully clickable planes have no sense because no one will fly it on the servers cos no one likes loosing every time. They should rather make Indian export version SU-30 or something, if they can't agree with Sukhoi.

I've read somewhere that they're planning to do it the way u said, having samples for every sam, but that was long time ago maybe they planning to make it more complex (based on prf frequency) with that new coming sam commander module.

I've watched most of guncams and seen only fw-190 that lost a left wing, can't find the video right now, seems that planes are not that fragile.

Or "Second Hand" from expansion best starts from 3:00 anyway there's a hind in the picture :)

I came back to MIG-21 after 5 years to check the flight model, but i think there is still some issues with it? I actually stopped flying it because flight model was changing so many times over the years that i lost trust in it. It behaves like it has thrust vectoring of some sort, is that how it suppose to be? Look at video that i made today, and at the one i've made in 2015 2020 last open beta patch video: my orginal topic from 2015 about spirral of death: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=150686 and the 2015 video:

I'm worried that they will be learning making that plane for DCS and even experienced 3rd-party struggle with their planes. Don't get me wrong but i just don't want another Alpha plane for years, so for me its a NO GO until it has hi-fidelity flight model and all other stuff. Lessons learned thanks to other dev's, vote with your wallet.

I can not believe that after all these years this plane still sounds like gas stove. I hope they're planning to do something with it in the future.

People constantly mention F-15C but we already have it in FC3 and Razbam is making E version, so it is not wise to make 2 almost same aircraft at the same time, its not profitable, you don't need to be an Einstein to know that. And after seeing how JF-17 was selling and Kuznetsov on the way its Mig-29K with it flashy screens, not only Russian clickable airframe but also capable and modern, seems players like that, and they will make what is going to sell well. Simple.

From a psychological perspective you should put all icons visible in the menu screen. It will cause that it will be tempting to fill them all with color = more sales, more money, faster modules development.

They could develop other FC-3 planes like Mig-29K for carrier operations. After releasing Kuznetsov the jet would sell well.

8. When someone ejects from aircraft or crash landed on enemy territory this automatically creates a heli rescue mission, so a player or AI will have to fly his heli land, pick you up and bring you back, otherwise you will be captured and banned from campaign and wait till next one. I wonder if they will sell the dynamic campaign module separately for each map? I assume that's because the Normandy dynamic campaign will be completely different from modern one like in Persian Gulf.

Any chance to give us a slider in options menu to choose for how long i want smoke visible? Like from 10sec - 60sec for SAM smoke visible. And for contrails 1min-5min.

Just give us FC4 jets that can't be modeled in full fidelity like: -Mig-29K for carrier -Su-35 thrust vectoring -Mig-25/31 -Su-24 Problem solved

I just hope that it will not be an Oleg's "two weeks" :megalol: Anyway new caucasus map is looking great!

I found something but I'm not sure what it is...

The worst thing is that now they will waste time reading 18 pages instead of focusing on something productive. We should get off this train earlier, it would hurt less.

The truth is that civil planes can do more good than bad in DCS even I sometimes join aerobatic servers just for fun and i very like it. I could even buy this module, but only if ED was dealing with the flight model. Since the flight model is so difficult to do, maybe ED could take care of it during product development and leave simple things like 3d modeling to Third Party? I guess some people here do not understand why we are disappointed, these people probably do not have the mig-21 module or they only fly straight ahead without any maneuvers.

Because they didn't create such hype train for yak-52 they just show it to us and thats ok. I think that CE2 can be even fun in aerobatic servers. But as many of you mentioned mig-21 is broken for so long that I sometimes think that ED should move them to mods section, get their MIG-21 with all rights and finish it properly with better flight model. What a shame that such a great plane get rusty in my hangar...

We need at least a slider in option menu for smoke disappearance. Lets say max option will give us around 60 sec and minimum 5 sec. The same for missiles from planes.

At least new clouds look better than the previous ones. They have sharp edges than blurred which looks better in my opinion.

I hope they will create SA-2 module fully clickable for hardcore rocket boys.

With the last patch something go wrong for sure, I'm talking about (DCS 1,5) lowering view distance dont give me more FPS. Before that patch I could have set everything to max and still have 60FPS now it drops to even 40FPS on low view distance. Talking about reinstalling nvidia drivers or other things dont help me. And I think its more placebo than any real fps gain. I5 4690/Gtx970 8GB ram

So if they cant or dont know how to repair that issue, I'm starting to worry about how they going to implement variable geometry wing aircraft flight model where it changes with wings angle? It seems to be much complicated than Mig-21 flight model.

Does anyone know when they fix this? Becouse of this bug I stopped flying Mig-21 :(