Jump to content

grimm862

Members
  • Posts

    106
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by grimm862

  1. That's hilarious. If the playerbase consisted of 90% multiplayer users that'd be mean DCS has a userbase of about 1000 people. If there's only 1000 people buying modules for DCS this games done yesterday.
  2. Considering they only sell the blackshark 3 now, they are still selling BS2 campaigns and you won't even be able to play them unless you bought the bs2 before the bs3 came out. So they are literally selling content that doesn't work what so ever. Imagine buying the new BS3 module for 70 dollars, then spending another 15 or whatever the campaigns cost, only to find out it isn't playable and you cannot purchase the bs2 to play the campaign that you just purchased. But I guess you don't have any issue with that. It's not really something worth defending ED on but do you.
  3. I am struggling to imagine being this worked up over a video game helicopter. It's a video game.
  4. Wait you think 90% of the DCS player base is playing multiplayer?
  5. I've had quite a few crashes with overclocked gpu running the BS3. Definitely gotta watch your clocks.
  6. Certainly wouldn't hold your breath!
  7. Why don't you just swap the cams over and try it for yourself?
  8. I really wish I could use stronger springs on mine but don't want it to break. I think I am using 50 and 40 and was too scared to do the two 50's, I haven't checked in a long time though, A stronger spring setup with the 200mm extension would be very welcome. It's far to easy to move the stick imo. Maybe I aught to try some different cams.
  9. Imagine being this rude to people trying to help when you are sitting here and basically demanding chuck drop what he's doing and give you a control scheme. I really can't understand the entitled attitude some people have. How much have you paid chuck for his excellent guides that he does for absolutely free? I'm sure it's a big fat nothing. Either set up your own controls or sit and wait like everyone else.
  10. This has to be a troll post.
  11. Ok thanks! I've also been enjoying the f-5 campaign quite a bit. Gunna have to jump back on this one soon.
  12. Sucks I'd much rather have this thing than the f-15. But I am sure the f-15 is going to sell like hotcakes. Keep up the great work razbam.
  13. This plane has been kind of a nightmare to bind for. It's probably the worst layout of keybinds in the entire game. Great module, terrible keybind section.
  14. The single mission hercules for the F-5 wants you to use tacan and now it just spins endlessly and never works. Was working fine last patch.
  15. Just need shadows being casted from these lightsources to really sell it. Seeing no shadows under the aircraft from the lighting looks kinda weird but we gotta start somewhere. Thank MSFS for pushing ED to focus on its graphics.
  16. You need to increase your curves so slight head movements give you almost 180 degrees, it will be awkward and difficult at first but once you get used to it you can basically look forward and turn your pilots head around without any effort. Definitely shouldn't be having to turn your head to where you cannot see your monitor to look backwards.
  17. Who knows they certainly moved on from any type of refresh to the F-5e thats for sure. Or even simple bug fixes.
  18. That would seem to be the case. Or not so much accurate but worth having to stop people from gaming too hard.
  19. ED following through on their promises like usual!! So stoked about the totally revamped F-5 released in 2.8!!! Thanks so much! Oh wait. Don't think ANY of that is happening. This company blows more smoke up peoples asses than Joe Camel.
  20. Are they seriously just never going to fix this? Didn't they say they were going to take a 2nd pass at the f-5 like just a year ago? I don't understand why they continue to ignore stuff like this. It's probably an incredibly simple fix. Considering there's a mod that fixes the thing.
  21. This is a constant frustration flying the mig 21 in this game. Nobody ever lists these crucial numbers in their briefings. I cannot know what channel my flight, or ATC or awacs, tankers, whatever is on unless I open the missions in the editor and find them myself. I can't understand why these are not listed in the briefings. You have the stuff listed in standard nato numerals, like ATC is on 127.00, which means absolutely nothing in a mig 21.
  22. Great example of the typical crap i find in this game for planes like the mig 21, I just bought the krasnodar campaign and all the ATC info is listed in nato style numerals instead of RBSN or ARC. Why? It's so simple to just write the rbsn's and arc numbers instead of not doing it and making me have to find this info myself. Why would the pilot breifing not include this absolutely crucial bits of information. Flying the mig 21 in this game in singleplayer is one of the most frustrating things I have ever done in a flight sim. I have absolutely no clue what channel my flight and awacs is on on the ARC radio and the only way to find it is to open up the mission editor and find all the info myself. That's a joke for a paid product. EDIT: Just realized paid campaigns are encrypted and I cant even view these files in the mission editor myself to see what these radio channels are.
  23. I dont have either one I just bought krasnodar and will give it a try. Not a fan of red flag style campaigns. Anything on the nevada map gets a big pass from me.
  24. Oh wow that looks awful? I thought they improved the lighting? Oof.
×
×
  • Create New...