iFoxRomeo

I got these errors with 190 2019-06-22 09:03:58.351 ERROR_ONCE DX11BACKEND: texture 'FW-190_NM_01' not found. Asked from 'GRAPHICSCORE' 2019-06-22 09:03:58.351 ERROR_ONCE DX11BACKEND: texture 'FW-190_NM_03' not found. Asked from 'GRAPHICSCORE' 2019-06-22 09:03:58.351 ERROR_ONCE DX11BACKEND: texture 'FW-190_NM_04' not found. Asked from 'GRAPHICSCORE' 2019-06-22 09:03:58.351 ERROR_ONCE DX11BACKEND: texture 'FW-190_NM_02' not found. Asked from 'GRAPHICSCORE'

THX for your effort.

I'll check it as soon as I get to my PC. I also noticed that the turn indicator shows life when the flaps travel. Flaps stop, turn indicator stops. Same as with the trim. Fox

Strange. The turn indicator still doesn´t work for me.

I have the same problem. Was about to open a threat myself. The turn indicator works as long as the elevator trim is trimming. The horizon is working as always. Fox

I happend to shoot down a Spit's "Damage Model" of the tail, but not the Spit itself... and got sniped by 119_Bruv shortly after that... meh.... Fox

Please explain how a low pressure can produce more poweroutput of the engine than a high pressure. Why use the 2nd stage, if the 1st stage produces more power? Fox

Once again: The problem is NOT the feeling. Even full motion helicopter simulators don't feel like their real counterparts, despite having 1:1 copies of their controls. The PC Gazelle does not have a plausible Helicopter Flight Modeling. That is the problem. I tell you that this FM doesn't replicate a authentic Helicopter. It doesn't matter what type of controls you are using. It is always wrong. Remove the centering springs from a Warthog Joystick, an you have a wonderfully suitable Cyclic Stick for a Helicopter simulation. But without Autopilot and force trim functionality. Fox

Noticed the non-functioning turn indicator. Interestingly: While trimming the elevator, the turn indicator shows some life. Stopping the trimming stops the turn indicator. Very strange. Fox

Of course the "feeling" depends on the equipment and the FM. But that is not the real problem with this module. If you have RL experience with Main- and Tail-rotor Helicopters, then you know what happens with the cyclic-stick when you go to hover, and then when you accelerate to cruising speed. You have to counter certain effects. E.g. if the cyclic-stick has the same position during fast forward flight as it has on ground at mechanical center, then your FM does not simulate a helicopter with main- and tail-rotor. No SAS counters that. Even fly-by wire Helicopters don't do that for you. That is one of the current Gazelle's FM problems. But again, PC works on a new FM. Let's see what they come up with. Fox

You will always have different oppinions about a feeling of a flightmodel. Many years ago a pilot told me that the MS Flightsim 2003 (Robinson)was good....:lol: Some pilots tend to think they have to take the limitations of the Home PC equipment into consideration. But that is just an assumption. The negative feedback to the Gazelle's FM is irrelevant to the equipment you use. I don't go into details, as it was written enough about it. Polychop wants to improve it. We will see. I hope they succeed. Fox

Very nice Mad-MM. Don't get me wrong, not wanting to lessen you skill. I am not in the vicinity of your skill. Hope to get there one day. But I wonder how the A8 will perform, once the Engine power limitations/damage will be inplemented. Currently the engine gets no damage from permanent max power usage. Even over-rev doesn't harm it. I like the Anton very much. Beautiful plane. And a Beast in the right hands, as seen in your video. Thank you. Fox

I took a few values. Atmosphere: 760mmHg 15°C no wind or turbulences Clean aircraft. Takeoff weight under 4100kg. Around 3000m altitude the 2nd stage of the charger kicks in. This leads to a significant power loss. I managed to fly with Max cont. pwr and Climb pwr setting at 3000m both in the 1st stage as well as in the 2nd stage. MCP with 1st stage(1.08ata) -> 535km/h, with 2nd stage(1.20ata) ->511km/h Climbpower with 1st stage(1.12ata) -> 552km/h, with 2nd stage(1.32ata) ->531km/h Although the pressure is less with the 1st stage at 3000m, the resulting speed is significant higher. Fox

What version of SRS is currently in use? I can't connect to the given ip with the current version (1.6.1.0) of SRS. BTW. Thanks EEKZ for the Server Fox

Clear the TPR associations, better the whole (TPR)category, buttons and axis. Then reassign the axis. The default mapping is wrong. Fox

Yes, I noticed that too. Fox

Full Throttle should result to manifold pressure und rpm be exactly at the red marks. And what do you have to loose. Give her fire! Close the cowling flaps. Edit: Check your prop-governour is activated. Otherwise you might overrev the engine. Fox

On a clean Anton with full throttle at 30ft MSL I get 535km/h in level flight (F2 View). Fox

Hi, I just did my first takeoff and landing in this nice bird. Enjoy. The landing was a bit rough. Thanks ED. Fox

Thank you, but in this case I don´t need to ask. I have my own experience with the Huey and have Friends who had LTE with a Huey. How many Helicopters do have a "safe pedal margin" described in their Flight Manual?

Big words. You will be judged by your own words. I really hope you can deliver what you promise. Helicopters are underrepresented in DCS. Fox

Here´s the post I meant: https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=1744396&postcount=3 from the DCS Huey FAQ Fox

The old Bell Helicopters, even some more modern ones, don't have a strong Tailrotor. That makes them more prone to LTE. How can you see, that the Huey's Tailrotor is weak.... I don't want to break Forumrule 1.16. I'm sure (though not 100%) one of the developers once wrote that the DCS Huey doesn't have LTE modeled. I'll try to find it, but don't hold your breath. Fox

Negative, LTE was never simulated in any DCS Helicopter. The Huey has a very weak Tailrotor. Together with strong tailwind you get problems. Fox

Yes like a modern flybarless RC Helicopter. There you usually have a fly-by-wire type system that takes a self-centering cyclic stick into account and compensates the helicopter typical behaviour. The real Gazelle's SAS is not capable of doing this. And it's SAS can be switched off. Btw. Even manned FBW Helicopters do not compensate the helicopter typical symptoms. Very strange to read from a RL Helicopter pilot that he is fine with the Gazelle's FM. The Huey has a lot of room for improvements. The Engine for example ist very far away from its real counterpart. But the FM feels authentic if you use a FFB joystick. Something you can't do with the Gaz because of the lack of FFB support from PolyChops side. And the Huey's FM (and Hip's) has also problems, if you know what to look for. Nobody asks for 100% accuracy, but it shouldn't feel like a lunar lander in an atmosphere free environment either. I hope that I am wrong and you are right, I really do. Fox