Angus

As a tomcat driver thinks .... Hornet sucks !!!!! :lol: Flying aboard the tomcat in DCS will be great (dreams comme true), if in the long term you can fly on the super tomcat it is wonderful!

Great update , things are moving forward :thumbup:

Great update ! Can we have any news about the Tomcat environment? -Flight deck crew and possibility to taxi on the deck , line up with catapult .... - Maybe a AI KA6 intruder for Refueling (for the earlier Tomcats ) on the ED carrier only 4 planes can take place on the deck, Can you recreate traffic on a deck ? It would be very immersive, but a huge task! Thank you for your regular communication, it is appreciable and allows to wait for the release :thumbup:.

Totally agree with Cobra, our first need is an F14. If subsequently it can evolve into F14D ..... wow! It would be a party!:thumbup: The pod lantirn was equipped with tomcat only from 1996. The JDAM ammunition carriage appeared only in 2001 (source wikipedia). The F14D is almost another plane( radar,cockpit....), I imagine that the time To develop it is almost as important as developing the F14 A and B. If I understand what cobra says, it is in the plans of heatblur. So I do not worry, we will have a beautiful first F14 A and B then later upgrade. and it's cool !!!:D

yes for sure! is there another laser designation pod on the tomcat? This is good news for Tarps, look forward to seeing this!:smilewink:

Even if there is no dynamic campaign, reconnaissance missions can be important in multiplayer campaigns made by the community (virtual squadrons for example) .This is one of the roles of Tomcat, so it is important To be able to play it.Maybe not a priority at the release ;). The Lantirn ability and precision bombardment is also part of Tomcat's missions, although the Hornet is better than him in this role, not everybody wants to fly in hornet. And anyway, we do not have one Nor the other for the moment ... (with still more news for the tomcat !!! :lol:)

+1 :thumbup: We can put AWACS On 243 .

:thumbup: thanks !

+1 i can confirm for blown tire (at take off) . and a single kamov round fire at 50 meters behind my plane(joke by a friend) . Take a hit with F5 = lose of ADC . normal or not? that is the question :smartass:

thanks for the job :thumbup:

Even if we need a real multi-role fighter. The F18 and the F15E are very different, one knows how to do everything, the other is specialized. The F15 E is a very interesting device for DCS. The multi pit, to start. Conducting a mission aboard the strike eagle must be a great experience. I hope it will come out. Please razbam do not give up!

If you want to discuss this there is an open topic ;) https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=176882

Too eager to release the spitfire :lol: Thanks for the Hotfix :thumbup:

Hello , Is what the F5 works if we put it out hot engines?

you can put off with breakers .

A game more interesting than football !!! Congratulations to the migs for their team tactics. I liked the low level progressions in tight formation of the viggen. Beautiful actions from the F5 and viggen. Thanks for the fun!

if you want to become a tank sniper" one shot one kill" , use GBU12 with JTAC or budy lasing :smartass: With a lot of training (and a bit of talent and luck) you can make a hit with the MK82. I'm joking a bit, but it's true that the bombing in F5 is not easy.That's why we love it :thumbup:

I use very few solo campaigns. But I think the bugs blocking these are the same as for mission editing. I'd like to understand why the updates break the functions of the mission editor that worked before.Does the addition of new modules or functions change the DCS database so much? It's just a question ;).

Yop ! you can find many tables in this check list : (thanks to Autogyro) https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/2024620/

To avoid this problem I pull the stick from 130 kts no matter the load or plane . It is true that since the last update, the tires seem more sensitive.

thanks for this campaign :thumbup: +1 for subtitles , listen english is difficult for strangers , reading is a bit more easy :smartass: I tried to create missions redflag multi players by putting the clients immortal ... But it did not work, difficult to script this action with the current editor.

I think that after the release of the f18, we do not need a new fighter. I like the F16, but I would prefer new Map and FC3 devices become hardcore, it would do less work for ED and we would have opponents for NATO planes.:thumbup:

I tried to kill armored vehicles only at the gun. I tested with Combat mix, HEI, piercing shells, same results.On a burst of 20-30 shells, only 4-5 impact the target, causing very little damage. I am not yet very comfortable with the F5. Maybe I need training. But I find that the dispersion of the shells is a little big. However the Gun of the F5 is deemed accurate. Rockets are effective only with direct impact,like other modules like A10 K50 .

Same thing :(

I'm pretty much in agreement with slider. Many of us are part of a virtual squadron and the bugs that pass on the stable version are embarrassing for the missions we do.(For example the squadron where I am regrouping: M2000C, F15C , A10C,KA50,UH1,F5E ,SA342.) We do not find it disturbing to have to wait several weeks before having an update, since the version on which we evolve is stable. Nothing prevents the most impatient to use the open beta. :smilewink: