Rudel_chw

\Saved Games\DCS\Kneeboard\F-5E-3 works for me.

Agree, but I'm worried not so much for the Skins, but for missions backward compatibility. Have not yet tested it fully, but I wonder if I will be able to re-fly some of the F-5 old missions and Campaigns, since the new F-5 in effect disables the old one. Why ED did chose that instead of having both aircraft coexist? I was expecting the same

You can't have a new 3D model for the aircraft while at the same time preserving compatibility with the skins of the older model.

That's odd, as it works on my end: This is my fix file: VPC fix for 2.9.6 (by Shlee).zip

Hi, Just wanted to add some background info on this aspect of Chile's F-5E: On January 1997 a Contract was signed with the "Tiger Century Aircraft" company of USA (https://www.tigercenturyaircraft.com/products) for the provision of 16 air refueling kits, at a total cost of US$ 5 millions. The kits were installed in Chile on 1997-98. Best regards, Eduardo

That's why rather than merely complain, I pinged one of M3 developer's, just in case he finds my artwork good enough to include on a quick update of the MiG-21. I'm using this fix successfully on my Single Player missions, as I also don't give a rat's behind for Multiplayer's use

Hi, thanks a lot for the report, I completely understand that sometimes real-life gets in the way of DCS ... we will have to wait, I'm flying the F-4 and the Mig-21 in the meantime, so not in a hurry Looking forward to your Mod, creating missions for it will be a nice change of pace ... once released I will pester an artistic friend to see if he can paint an argentinian livery for me, to use the Lanc on the South Atlantic Map posing as a Lincoln:

It doesn't work for me either. Also, the MB339 has a "SEAT" parameter, but its value is always "0" irrespective if I'm at the from or at the rear cockpit. May I suggest that you report this on the Bugs & Problems section of the MB-339 subforum, so that its developers can take a look?

OK, let me check.

what aircraft are you using?

Yes, please do

I'm not ED, but on my view these wish items are kind of useless, as the end-users have no idea how much development effort a wish requires, nor have them any idea how many development resources ED has available for such wishes after discounting the resources already committed to on-going projects. That means that most of the time the users make wishes that can't be granted. To me, what is important is the bug reporting ... but useful bug reporting, with enough information to be able to reproduce the bug ... just a simple "this used to work and now it doesn't", or "this bug has existed for many years and is well known, so no need to describe it again" is not useful at all and most likely will be ignored.

No problem, having less than 32 GB was just a guess ... now looking at your log it shows a networking error: "Login failed with code 502", so maybe there was a temporary internet error with the DCS authentication servers. Does your issue still persists?

Use the saturation sliders for that.

Hi, Here is a User Mod that I've been using to employ the LUA files that you shared earlier, with the fixes suggested by @LCO489, I added also the Kneeboard information and its in OvGME format: MiG-21 - RSBN for Sinai Map (by Hiromachi & LCO489).zip The kneeboard pages added are: If you believe them to be useful, feel free to employ them in any way you like. Best regards, Eduardo

the author has not connected on almost two years, hopefully it isn’t health related.

Maybe you have only 16 GB of ram or less? DCS has increased its memory requirement in recent versions, 32 GB is now the recommended amount: https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/downloads/world/stable/

This is sad, I was looking forward to this series of Campaigns, as @Chef98 is one of the most innovative DCS mission designers, and I enjoy his work a lot. I see he has not connected during the last 8 months, hopefully it isn't a health issue, but merely Real life getting in the way of our hobby

Hi, Just checked, and the parameters apply to the Su-33 as well. I did a brief proof-of-concept: a) This triggers detect the moment when both left and right main wheels are compressed at touch down. The trigger zone assures me that it happens only on the carrier: b) This next trigger is the same, but also detects if the aircraft is at rest on the deck: three wheels compressed and speed less than 60 (to account for the carrier + wind speed) Here is a short video of these triggers: sorry the poor landing, its been a while since I last flew the Su-33

Hello, If its a Single player mission, you could use Weight-on-wheels parameters to confirm if the aircraft is in contact with the carrier, as using altitude minimum would depend on the carrier deck height over the water. You would need also a moving trigger zone attached to the carrier, so if all three aircraft wheels are in contact with the deck and the aircraft is within that moving zone, then we can assume that the aircraft has successfully landed on it. For the F-18C and F-14 the parameters are: BASE_SENSOR_WOW_LEFT_GEAR BASE_SENSOR_WOW_RIGHT_GEAR BASE_SENSOR_WOW_NOSE_GEAR If the parameter is 0, then that wheel is in the air, if its 1 then that wheel is in contact with the deck. I'm not sure if the same parameters apply to the Su-33, would have to check ... which aircraft is your mission for?

on my DCS it works now, as seen on this video:

Thanks for your kind words, I’m currently halfway through the third mission, so hopefully I will release this first set soon. I intend to keep adding more as I progress through my own training The Sinai map is pretty gorgeous, which adds a lot to the missions ambiance.

you can enable unlimited munitions on the Options screen.

Hi, actually the issue was caused by my hotas throttle…. A calibration fixed it for me, as I exposed here:

Hi, I have still not finished my re-training on the -21, so I can't attempt yet any combat mission with it, however I liked the fact that you added custom weather instead of the old default, and the custom US livery seems to work now. Thanks for the effort invested on fixing these missions Best regards, Eduardo