159th_Viper

No, he's not correct. The tailwheel locks for the rest of us pretty well. If you are serious about getting assistance for the issues you are experiencing, then post a track - it only takes a few seconds.

Yes but is it activated? Did you enter your serial# as prompted for SF automatic activation?

Here's another one: 1kd3FIjKcSI

Hint: Enable Auto-Rudder, bring up Control Indicator and see what rudder inputs are required for a successful take-off: You will see that at no stage are toe-brakes utilized nor are they needed for take-off.

Yes you do if your intention is to accord with reality. In order for players like you who do not care for the reality/difficulty, there are options to make it a helluva lot easier, in your particular instance the enabling of 'Auto-Rudder'. So what we have is two options, excluding Game Mode, that caters for ALL possible eventualities/scenarios/play-styles. Where's the issue?

Only took 34 posts for the WWII Warbird armchair experts to surface I see :pilotfly:

Oh yes, be sure to invert the toe brake axis. By default the toe brakes are engaged until inverted in the Options menu.

Give it time.

Look in the relevant mods folder, ie mods/FW-190 I presume. Not 100% certain as I am posting from my phone.

Aye, if it was easier to get those .50 cal's pointed in the right direction I would have chosen the Mustang :)

If I had to fight my clone, I'd choose a Dora. Those cannons hurt!

Apologies.....those 7 years in Law school did me no favours :)

I do. I would not be posting otherwise. My intention is to elicit substantive documentary proof, if possible, of all perceived issues. The reason for this is not for me trying to be a hard-a$$ but rather to enable me to submit a comprehensive bug report to the Devs in order to get the matter fixed asap. Now with that in mind and further keeping in mind that there are literally thousands of reports dealing with ALL DCS products, you will understand that a report based on a 'feeling' will not merit immediate investigation and be treated with the same urgency as a report that I can substantiate and argue with the Devs on your behalf by having regard to hard, documentary evidence. Do you see now why I press and press in an attempt to get ALL available info/documents? I'd rather drag a thread out for three pages ensuring I have done all I can to build an airtight case than report it on the first post. That said, I'll report the matter 'as is', based on your 'response delay vs hydraulic system responsiveness' observations.

Is that not to be expected from a 1950's era aircraft? Cannot compare to other DCS aircraft when attempting to rationalise behaviour.

Based on what? We need corroborative evidence, not perception. I cannot submit a bug report based on a feeling. As stated, visually comparing RL vids to In-SIM vids yields no apparent distinction. Do you have access to RL footage of a Sabre doing 'snaking turns' per chance?

Might very well be, but that is another topic entirely. Your original post dealt with the question of responsiveness while NWS is engaged. We need to deal with that matter only - does more harm than good heaping up multiple perceived issues per thread/post :)

It's all in the announcement: http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=126712 You get two aircraft.

Honestly? Watch the vid and comment on In-SIM behaviour. Highlight perceived issues with due regard to the time-line and post them here. Doing so will allow me to investigate further. Telling me to 'Compare with real world, if possible. Otherwise, review tech data available, operational impact and evaluate plausibility' helps sweetblowfcukall at this stage in proceedings. Kindly do as requested :) In any event, comparing RL footage as per your vids and the vid from In-SIM I am at a loss to differentiate: All seems as it should be, which is why I kindly request that In-SIM footage be analysed and commented upon first ;)

Why is this a bug?

Herewith In-SIM footage captured with 1.2.9: Note that second half is In-Cockpit view with the Controls Indicator enabled so that rudder pedal inputs can be compared to plane behaviour. Pedals are at Linear/Default: No Curvature/Saturation adjustment. **Disclaimer: This is the very first time I have taxied with NWS in the Sabre. As such results are not indicative of lengthy time spent behind the wheel, so to speak** MomyoXEheT8 Having due regard to the footage, what exactly is/are the perceived issue/s? Kindly advise (preferably with reference to vid timeline) so I can investigate further/report if necessary.

Which plane/mision? There is no master Arm switch in FC3 flyables that you should toggle on IIRC.

Those cannons...........Beware those Cannons.......... The Mustang drivers are in for some Hidings of note!

It's a laser beam-rider, no different to the Vikhrs and they seem to work pretty well.

Man learns. Man also conveniently chooses when to abide by said lessons, alternatively whether to ignore them. Therein lies our Folly, which is why history so often repeats itself. Always Remember, Never Forget

The Legend....... pLFqeXm_5X4 :P