T_A

Zeus , we understand that the Super 530D is not fire and forget from an engineering point of view it seems to me (without having any actual real life knowledge of the matter) - that if a missile is launched at a target , there is some rudimentary encoding in the signal from the radar (otherwise it can conflict with other 530D`s guidance) it would also seem logical to me that the radar should send the same encoding for the target if no new missile was launched and the time from last launch was less than max flight time of the 530D AND it would also seem logical that the missile , if it is still at an angle that can reacquire the signal - should reacquire it.

i was thinking that just the other day, it makes no sense for it not to relock the missile, even IRL.

Whats nonstop? in the real round lives are limited to 4 per day, that non stop will be over pretty fast. also remember that Mirage is hardly as deadly as you think (and don`t get me wrong i love it!)

At the moment the Mirage is hardly BVR capable , using Fox 1 is not a real possibility until radar is fixed and that could take another month atleast considering they are still trying to debug this and patches for 1.5 are once every 2 weeks MAYBE.

Not according to NVIDIA`s press release http://nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/a-quantum-leap-in-gaming:-nvidia-introduces-geforce-gtx-1080

Damn I want that 1080 , need to sell my gtx 980 tho it would go so well with the 4k monitor and rift that i don't have :(

Hi Cobra , you made a new thread for concentrating all your updates from other posts. its a great idea! but can you also link to the original post so we can get context ?

if there was another option: 'i don`t care either way' , i would still say 'no' DCS , contrary to FSX is too complex for devs to spew out almost-arcade level modules. Since DCS modules are too far in between for devs, and since there are only a handful of development groups (literally) , then they need to focus all their time on the planes we need/want first before making stuff most people never heard of.

Ye its fine Zeus, it lets me keep telling myself that its not my poor skills that gets me killed :)

Is it just me or is close combat mode kinda not working, it doesnt seem to change scan modes unless i 'unlock' (i don`t have anything locked) and it really does seem to pick up almost anything. it was working fine like 1-2 patches ago

Would not have mind seeing a Kurnass 2000 (IAF F-4E retrofitted with modern avionics) but i`d settle for a F-4E ...one day

Perhaps its time Buddyspike team will think about switching from built in IC to using scripts / software to do anti-cheating, allow bad player reporting from within the game (using chat) etc. for example something as obvious as F-15 firing a AIM54 should be picked up by the monitoring system in a second and player should be automatically kicked (3rd time ban?)

Not sure if a bug but- i was hit by Strela and lost my RWR , the status lights for the RWR and D2M start blinking . after landing and repair , the lights kept blinking , i tried to turn off and on again , didn't make a difference. (RWR was working after repair)

You get to see contacts that your are not suppose to , that is pretty much it. anyway this discussion is moot , its been declared by the server owners that they do not allow such mods, shouldn't matter whether they can detect it or no - its respecting their wishes.

Well, if we take the M2000C as example , you can say the model/cockpit was finish when they released beta , all that was left was some missing features and a few (read lots) of bugs. now , almost 5 months post beta release, there are still some bugs , features are nearly all complete. would i have preferred RAZBAM to wait 5 month and release it as it is today? hell no. but from what we know of LNS , they will probably not release a product in such a 'raw' state and would prefer to delay release for a more polished result. so can we hope for 2016 F-14? maybe , remember that LNS said long time ago that 3D model and graphic assets are pretty much the last thing they do and they prefer to start with system programming. and we are already seeing them flying it ingame.

about red part : sure ED allows you to export ownship data , but it was never intended to be shared with others like this, that is the real issue.

C0ff from ED has already stated in a different thread that ED has become aware of the issue and will add a new option for servers to disable own ship data export (effectively disabling leavu and also any other software that uses that data

What a pointless bump, why post on a year old update for a comment like this when everyone are just waiting for a new part 2 update.

Speaking of VTB, i`m getting alot of aliasing on the green lines , they seem to be very thine, i have MSAA set to X16 at 1920X1200 res , i dont get that with F-15C or SU27

Still think Fox 3 should be left out , its just not fair for people who don`t want to fly FC3

Can you also change inverters start position to off? I hate it when cold start is shortcut cuz of that

I know this isn't necessarily helping , but binding keys works fine for me, it could be something specific to your profile in <Saved Games>

Oh i`v been hearing that roar lately , nice to know that was it

Now bring out the mig15 vs F86 and the real war will start!

So if a jamming is detected will we get some kind of indication of it direction like in FC3 planes?