SDsc0rch

the manual says flares are dispensed by pressing the switch AFT (programmed to kybd button D) and chaff are released by pressing the switch forward (E) however in practice, only "D" works (switch AFT) and the CMDS system fires *both* chaff and flare how do i get it to perform the way the manual states?

As interesting as civilian aircraft might sound, it would probably be one of the more boring products in the flight simulation software industry... - MS flight simulator - FSX - P3D - X-plane - ... ... ...

+++

@Lieuie..... STFU

in one sense i kinda don't care how long it takes - look, they give us "early access" in the old days we had no choice - we had to just wait - when it was done, it was done - deal with it these modules are hard - they take time ---- cold hard truth of life #74

++

negative Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

i think this is the best argument for permanent/non-removable CFTs i've seen yet

exactly well said

my eyes my eyesssss!lol

@DR.... good post

are you also asking ED to replicate the avionics suites of isreali and singaporean (sp?) aircraft?? or do you just want their exteriors?? #Realism

those are not strike eagles

i keep seeing ppl requesting to be able to remove the CFTs i get it - the strike eagle has bigger engines - so you want a bigger better eagle - there might be one or two pictures floating on the internet pipe dream - never gonna happen.... (what's that meme? mean girls? "quit trying to make it happen - its never gonna happen?") ((pps.. you might be surprised how few strike eagles actually have the bigger engines))

oh absolutely - going all the way back to the first models... but you just have to manage it like any other module - you think the A-10 is *fully* represented in the sim? you think the A-10 in DCS is a 1:1 replication of the real-world?? it is not every module is going to be that way - just do the same for the C-model that's all i'm saying ED has all the source material they need - they've had it for a long time

probably referring to expanded mode

both ----- i "know" we're getting a full-up E i'm advocating for a full-up C A-G is easier so more ppl are going to want it (ground targets don't move) - to be effective, to gain mastery, in air-to-air... takes dedication, cultivation of technique, etc - its a hard-earned skill i would expect fewer ppl would favor or prefer the C-model since it has a PFM, its already "got some love" so the c-model goes to the end of the line (unfortunately) i retain hope and optimism that it is ED's vision to have wall-to-wall end-to-end DCS level aircraft

what is "RTS"?

i'm sure its only a matter of time - especially considering it is being phased out of service (ps.. "quite some countries" --- besides UK, who else flies it?) --- Royal Air Force Italian Air Force German Air Force Royal Saudi Air Force 4 countries

why not BOTH?!? ^^the right answer^^ we're going to need both to flesh out an airwing strike package - might as well put them both on the list...

"yet" (( crossing fingers they can make it happen.... someday ))

gotta admit... with ED putting sooooo much work in to the A-G radar (HOW LONG has it been the reason the hornet was delayed??), i'm super curious how its going to look all the features listed are amazing in their own right talk about an electric jet!

wanted --- full DCS-level F-15C (ASM - advanced systems modeling)

pepin was asking for tacview to output the thermal readings of IR targets

thx for that link, phantom also of interest on that site........ https://ia800208.us.archive.org/18/items/JANES_FA-18/JANES_FA-18.pdf