SDsc0rch

GOOD! and good riddance!

ED responded to me for future reference.... OPTIONS / MISC un-check the "autologin" box

in the new system, we get logged in automatically at startup what if we want to log out of our account?

ooh!

improved! i like it : ) it used to have a much darker (and browner - ?) tint to it and it actually got in the way - it was *too* dark this is MUCH better thank you ED : )

youtube video inop

i think it was a joke : P

what a lousy business model eh?

++1

recon bird?

USAF pilots use night vision at ALL ALTITUDES - not just low-level

the USAF fights at night - in all weather -------- many ppl would like night vision in the F-15C

its gotta fight its way in : ) self-escort! : )

did i miss something? AIM-120 not included with f/a-18 early access because... ?? https://www.facebook.com/eagle.dynamics/posts/10159615567030341 is the "hornet amraam" going to be different than the "current amraam"? is the DCS AMRAAM getting an update??

*cough*said-that-about-2017*cough* (and 2016 if i recall correctly)

+1

^^^ +1 ^^^

the low-fidelity avionics makes DCS look very..... "arcadey"

not going to get in to it in detail here - if you want, google the filename "TO1F15C3413 .pdf" referred to as the "dash 34" --- the eagle's non-nuclear weapons delivery manual https://imgur.com/Jw6c5gz many (many) awesome features that make the eagle far more lethal than is currently modeled in the sim ED has this doc for many of us, we'll never get the chance to actually fly these jets, DCS is the closest we'll ever get - getting the DCS eagle as close as possible to the real-deal, gets us close as possible to that experience who wouldn't want that??

if that's true ("if"), then that's really a raw deal for those of us who are really in to the eagle ----- i want to see the eagle brought up to DCS standards why should we be "penalized" by being stuck at FC3 levels because the eagle was developed back in LOMAC days...? but.. i really don't think that's true --- i think it is ED's desire to bring all FC3 a/c up to DCS level

wasn't it wags that said it in one of his video interviews?

word on the street is that movement on bringing red aircraft to (continued) high fidelity is hindered by the russian govt (???) and the f-15c ASM is "not on our plate" (belsimtek) i thought i've heard in the past that ED wanted to bring all FC3 a/c up to DCS level but it doesn't seem like we're not proceeding toward that goal with much intensity in the case of the redfor a/c....... in the interest of continuing improvement, wouldn't it be possible to turn over that segment of the DCS lineup to 3rd party devs, outside of russia and thus outside of the purview of russian jurisdiction? and in the case of the F-15C, before we launch in to new projects, shouldn't we finish up unfinished modules first? not trying to be argumentative or critical - just speaking in the interest of gaining the "best experience" possible from DCS thanks

that's what i was thinking even if we don't get a full up delta, the bravo was no slacker...

EA-18G Growler transiting Rainbow Canyon/Jedi Transition ------- notice the sound at time 00:07...

^^^ +1 ^^^