Kappa

I was very disappointed from the Harrier, then i bought the F-18 and I've found it is far from being complete too... No SLAVE on Target point for TGP, No TGP Box on HUD, no horizontal movement for Radar, INS bugs and more... What can I say... Now Harrier doesn't look so bad... :megalol:

Maybe you mean 4th September :smilewink:

A bug, i've also reported it in the bug section and Wags marked it as REPORTED, so ED confirm there is something wrong. It happend since they implemented INS so it must be related to it. I really hope they'll fix this soon :)

Unfortunally they didn't fix this in yesterday update. Hope for the next one :thumbup:

I use to turn off the TACAN volume in the AUDIO panel on the left console. Don't know if there is some way to turn off the tacan system it self... I think it's part of MIDS.

Bore range should be 20 nm. 10 nm is for 30x20 and vert. In this moment the ACM modes are not modeled correctly please see this: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=256266

This was exactly what I was asking to my self... There is a workaround?? AFAIK misalignment increases with the flight time. So if you'll make some tests keep in mind that you will get different resoults if you don't keep this in your mind. With a 100nm navigation the misalignment is very evident, it makes impossible even the use of LGB's since the HUD gives you incorrect drop parameters that will make you drop a bomb far away from the target and it will not be able to spot the TGP laser because of the distannce or maybe the bomb has a completely wrong angle... Unfortunally this bug makes the F-16 almost useless in A-G for now... Hope they'll fix it soon. :smilewink:

Hi Wags, thanks for your reply, it is very nice to see you ED guys taking care of us on the forum, very nice. Maybe I wasn't clear enought in my previous message, unfortunately my english is rough and rusty. I am talking about all ACM modes, so bore and vertical are very slow too. It may be releted to the bug mentioned by Alfas (Thank you Alfas), I wans't aware of it. I will try to pay attention to my radar elevation and if I find out something more I'll let you know. Thanks

Hello, I was wondering if the tracking speed of Bore, 20x30 and Vertical scan are modeled correctly. I mean, it takes al loooooooot of time to lock a target and sometimes it so slow that I just give up and fire without a lock leavig all the hard work to the missle seeker... Is really that slow IRL or it is WIP?

Thanks for fixing it :thumbup:

Yes, for sure but i don't have my PC because I'm not at home and it was a long mission with many clients and it would be a pain to analyze trk and find where it's happened... It's easier to reproduce it following what I've wrote before. I'm sorry, I know that the trk is needed but I can't provide it in short time. The issue has been noticed also from my wing buddyes so i'm am pretty sure there is something ED should check. unless the problem was somehow generated by the server we were on... I'll try to have some tests tonight if I can

Anyway if someone here has time to check it out, this can help: TWS mode -> lock TGT in STT - > turn exeeding the radar gimbal limit-> STT lock won't brake

No, I can't provide a trk or a screen right now, but AFAIK it happens when you do an STT lock starting from TWS.

Woah, I can keep the STT lock even If I turn 180 degree off the target... Is it normal???:huh:

Dude, are you serious? Every squadron need a server unless they want to play only 5 player missions... There are a lot of servers ,in our fighter wing we have 2 phisical servers and 5 DCS server istances running. It cost more than 60 euros per month to rent a server with windows licence and HW req. for DCS... Imagine how many more server will be with a DCS server on linux... Just like you I don't know how hard can it be to make a porting but it will be a good thing.

Dude... People ho buy this game fly on servers. A DCS server version compatibile with Linux would be great because, for exemple, It would cost a lot less to rent a server because you won't need ti pay for Windows server licence...

OOOhhhooo, nice to know! Thank you! :)

Hahahahah, my daughter wants a Barbie and a Bat-mobile for this Xmas... No joke... I think you can help me with this. :lol: BTW, thank you for the great job u do with your guides :thumbup:

In case you missed it :)

And keep in mind that you'll need to edit it again at every DCS update because updater will overwright it

Hi, I'll try to explain my problem, I don't say it is a bug, but it is making me crazy. So, I have an X-52 Pro, and I've set one of the throttle rotaries as Radar ANT elevation. The problem is that when I pull or push the axis I have to bring it back to the center manually every time... To be more confortable, it should work just like the TGP zoom axis that zooms incrementally without the need of bringing it back to the center to stop zooming in and out.. I understand this is made intentionally maybe because IRL F-16 has a switch that come back to center when released but i'm still looking for a good configuration of this function in my X-52 Pro. Hope there is a solution. Thanks

It depend on you, ask your self: "Am I bored? Do I have someting else that keep me busy?". If you are bored and you don't have other toys... Well get it!

Thanks V... Added to the list that reminds me why I don't fly this module anymore... :thumbup:

Reading this thread make me realize that the harrier doesn't have any data link... Is that tight or Is It just another thing missing?

As far as I know, they said the initial implementation of dynamic campaigns will be in 2021.